does anyone know what cotto and paulie came into the fight weighing?
One Last Cotto-Malignaggi Question?
Collapse
-
Cotto came in at 250 pounds, and Paulie was a mere 110 pounds. That bastard....Originally posted by STCdoes anyone know what cotto and paulie came into the fight weighing?Comment
-
they were both 138 1/4Originally posted by STCdoes anyone know what cotto and paulie came into the fight weighing?Comment
-
he looks like a chipmunk storing food for the cold monthsOriginally posted by DerrangedDamn looked like Paulie had an apple in his mouth.
I gave Paulie the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 9th round. I had him winning the first half of the 2nd round as well until he knocked down. After that, he wasnt the same.Comment
-
Cotto punched harder, he really didn't even push Malignaggi around the ring which surprised me. Malignaggi was the better boxer because he landed the better and more frequent combinations. Does that mean Malignaggi is the better fighter? No it doesn't. Thats whats wrong with this thread. Cotto is the better puncher Malignaggi is the better boxer, Cotto beats Malignaggi 10 / 10 at this time.Originally posted by machotimeCotto did everything better than Paulie, he boxed better, fought better and landed the better placed harder shots.
Cotto seemed to become frustrated as Paulie held and held and held in the middle rounds. Paulie was fast and landed flurries that penetrated Cotto's Gloves but he did not accomplish that without paying the concequences.
Malignaggi is clearly the better boxer but Cotto is better in the ring. Someone who claims to watch boxing is going to come in here and try to tear my arguement apart now... Most likely because they dont understand boxing styles.Comment
-
LOL, you are obbessed. Thats why you hang out at the Miguelcotto forum with a different username. Cotto will outbox Hatton, using his jab, that is all that he needs to win.Originally posted by HousCotto punched harder, he really didn't even push Malignaggi around the ring which surprised me. Malignaggi was the better boxer because he landed the better and more frequent combinations. Does that mean Malignaggi is the better fighter? No it doesn't. Thats whats wrong with this thread. Cotto is the better puncher Malignaggi is the better boxer, Cotto beats Malignaggi 10 / 10 at this time.
Malignaggi is clearly the better boxer but Cotto is better in the ring. Someone who claims to watch boxing is going to come in here and try to tear my arguement apart now... Most likely because they dont understand boxing styles.Comment
Comment