I still havent seen the fight yet but its coming. However from alot of fans and writers Im still getting conflicting reports. Ive read so many post & articles talking about how Paulie clearly was the better boxer and made Cotto look ****** at times but just didnt have enough power, experience, and Cotto was too big.
Then I hear the other half of the people saying that Cotto beat Paulie at his own game and he was clearly the better boxer and he mostly beat Paulie by outboxing him.
Then there has been alot made of the holding. Alot of the people say that Paulie held Cotto alot and that is part of the thing that saved him but then I read other articles talking about that Cotto was the one benefiting from the holding because the ref wouldnt break them and Cotto would just kill Paulie in those holds and clinches with vicious shots.
Then I read one article saying that it was a great belt with hardly any clinches and alot of great infighting.
Then again, I read alot that says Paulie only won 2 or 3 rounds but then I read alot that says Paulie won 6 or got a draw.
I have a bad feeling that when I watch this fight that Im going to think that Paulie did alot better the others think. I think alot of fans and judges tend to be seperated on what they like. 2 people can watch the same exact thing but score something totally different because one guy loves to watch the art of boxing but the other guy will love the big shots. For example, in the Spinks & Mayorga fight you had alot of people saying Spinks made him look like a fool and others said that Mayorga clearly won and Spinks ran all night.
I try to stay in the middle. I am big on slick boxers but if a guy is doing well against a slick boxer then I will give him props. I still dont see how anyone had Hopkins winning any of the Taylor fights. I love Callazo's slick style and think he couldve beat Hatton if he wouldnt have let Hatton hold him so much at the end but he did and I think Callazo lost, so that will show you that Im not bias to the slick fighter.
I cant wait to see this Cotto fight because it sounds like one of those that can split alot of people. Look at what these 2 writers say about the fight and both of them love Cotto and pretty much hated Malignaggi. My main reason for this thread is I know people are going to be pretty much divided on what they thought about the fight but I just wanted to know who you guys think was the better "boxer"? Who Outboxed Who?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I figured those links wouldnt work but Ill post the articles
Then I hear the other half of the people saying that Cotto beat Paulie at his own game and he was clearly the better boxer and he mostly beat Paulie by outboxing him.
Then there has been alot made of the holding. Alot of the people say that Paulie held Cotto alot and that is part of the thing that saved him but then I read other articles talking about that Cotto was the one benefiting from the holding because the ref wouldnt break them and Cotto would just kill Paulie in those holds and clinches with vicious shots.
Then I read one article saying that it was a great belt with hardly any clinches and alot of great infighting.
Then again, I read alot that says Paulie only won 2 or 3 rounds but then I read alot that says Paulie won 6 or got a draw.
I have a bad feeling that when I watch this fight that Im going to think that Paulie did alot better the others think. I think alot of fans and judges tend to be seperated on what they like. 2 people can watch the same exact thing but score something totally different because one guy loves to watch the art of boxing but the other guy will love the big shots. For example, in the Spinks & Mayorga fight you had alot of people saying Spinks made him look like a fool and others said that Mayorga clearly won and Spinks ran all night.
I try to stay in the middle. I am big on slick boxers but if a guy is doing well against a slick boxer then I will give him props. I still dont see how anyone had Hopkins winning any of the Taylor fights. I love Callazo's slick style and think he couldve beat Hatton if he wouldnt have let Hatton hold him so much at the end but he did and I think Callazo lost, so that will show you that Im not bias to the slick fighter.
I cant wait to see this Cotto fight because it sounds like one of those that can split alot of people. Look at what these 2 writers say about the fight and both of them love Cotto and pretty much hated Malignaggi. My main reason for this thread is I know people are going to be pretty much divided on what they thought about the fight but I just wanted to know who you guys think was the better "boxer"? Who Outboxed Who?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I figured those links wouldnt work but Ill post the articles



Comment