Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[Shape up]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that [COLOR="red"]would be[/COLORmonitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------ I've highlighted the important words, see if you can understand what WADA is saying, good luck ******

[travestyny]

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that [COLOR="red"]would be[/COLORmonitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------ I've highlighted the important words, see if you can understand what WADA is saying, good luck ******

AND WHERE DOES WADA SAY IT WAS ILLEGAL, YOU MORON. SERIOUSLY, SHUT THE **** UP. YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

THE WHOLE ARTICLE IS ABOUT USADA DEFENDING ITSELF, AND WADA WAS BROUGHT IN TO CONFIRM THAT THEY DID NOT BREAK THEIR RULES.

EVEN IN THE PARAGRAPH RIGHT BEFORE, BENNETT SAID MAYWEATHER DIDNT BREAK WADA’S RULES.

DO YOU SEE THE WORD ILLEGAL ANYWHERE THERE YOU IDIOT.

We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight, however.”

THE **** DO YOU THINK THAT MEANS YOU ******.

Serious question: HOW CAN YOU BE SO DUMB?

IF WADA WENT ON RECORD SAYING USADA BROKE THEIR RULES, WHAT THE **** DO YOU THINK WOULD HAPPEN AS A RESULT OF THAT???

STOP DVCKING THE PERMA BAN CHALLENGE YOU IDIOT. IM READY TO DO EVERYONE A FAVOR AND GET RID OF YOUR DUMB ASS. YOU GONNA STEP UP OR STAY A PVSSY???

Unless you are willing to step up and put your account on the line, like I’m willing to, stop writing to me. You are far too ****** for this.

[ADP02]

OH REALLY?


THEN CALL ME OUT FOR SOMETHING, FOOL. AND WATCH ME LAUGH WHEN YOU'RE PROVEN WRONG.

Haven't you been paying attention. You already tried that. I called your bluff and proved you lied. You wanna go through that again?

In your post you were not directly responding. You were bringing up other points that I listed. That is, you were DEFLECTING and making it appear that you were responding directly ....

Others may not realize your deflections but I know you ...... Actually, some people have begun to pick up on that too.

[Shape up]

AND WHERE DOES WADA SAY IT WAS ILLEGAL, YOU MORON. SERIOUSLY, SHUT THE **** UP. YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

THE WHOLE ARTICLE IS ABOUT USADA DEFENDING ITSELF, AND WADA WAS BROUGHT IN TO CONFIRM THAT THEY DID NOT BREAK THEIR RULES.

EVEN IN THE PARAGRAPH RIGHT BEFORE, BENNETT SAID MAYWEATHER DIDNT BREAK WADA’S RULES.

DO YOU SEE THE WORD ILLEGAL ANYWHERE THERE YOU IDIOT.



THE **** DO YOU THINK THAT MEANS YOU ******.

Serious question: HOW CAN YOU BE SO DUMB?

IF WADA WENT ON RECORD SAYING USADA BROKE THEIR RULES, WHAT THE **** DO YOU THINK WOULD HAPPEN AS A RESULT OF THAT???

STOP DVCKING THE PERMA BAN CHALLENGE YOU IDIOT. IM READY TO DO EVERYONE A FAVOR AND GET RID OF YOUR DUMB ASS. YOU GONNA STEP UP OR STAY A PVSSY???

Unless you are willing to step up and put your account on the line, like I’m willing to, stop writing to me. You are far too ****** for this.

if it's only legal to give a retro TUE if WADA monitors it as they stated then the opposite applies if it's not monitored, I **** more intelligent things than you, if you cannot work out what WADA was stating in that statement, then that just shows how you don't understand how Fluid IVayweather :A bought usada, :B wrote a contract that was only a publicity stunt, :C was allowed to use PEDS and flush them out with the blessing of usada, your a naieve little floyd loving gimp who will lie through his teeth to uphold fluids honour, even though you don't know him, he'd be sitting in his house saying I've got all these ****** muther***ers arguing for me, *** they're dumb

[ADP02]

ALMOST FORGOT THIS ONE:


FLOYD'S CONDITION (DEHYDRATION) CAUSES THE DCO TO STOP THE SESSION AND HAND IN DILUTED (HYPER-HYDRATED) SAMPLES!!!


You have thoroughly embarrassed yourself. Log Off!!!

You are a keyboard warrior (ie. your gif) who DEFLECTs



Lets clear the air from the dirt that you have accumulated from all your digging:



1) WADA & USADA BOTH agree with me!!! (read quotes below. Yes, when the DCO determines to stop, the DCO sends the sample(s) collected whether they are DILUTED or NOT!!!

WRONG #1 BY YOU!!!!

WADA
"The DCO sends all Samples collected to the Laboratory for analysis, irrespective of whether or not the Samples meet the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis."

AND this

USADA

"The DCO will check the specific gravity (concentration) of the sample. Additional samples may be requested if the sample is not within the required range."

In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory






2) The DCO can determine to stop the sample collection due to several reasons that COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN FLOYD'S CASE ..... and the determining factor could have been something other than what you point out here(over hydration/dehydration)!!!!

In my response to your question, I brought it up as a possible scenario. That the DCO could determine to stop and be providing only diluted samples.

Your response was like a dog trying to catch his tail!!!


WRONG #2 for being a dunce!!!




3) Over Hydration/dehydration could have been a contributing factor.

I remember even you and DoNothing bringing up why the delay was 6+ hours.
Remember that you guys said it more than likely took that long because of the probability that the urine was dilute and the DCO had to wait it out.

Now that you have read other cases, what could have happened is that Floyd gave multiple samples (some partial) and the DCO had no more (good) containers to continue.

Floyd requested that they call it a day and DCO agreed in this case and determined to call it a day.

This is a valid scenario as per the case that you even read.


WRONG AGAIN by Travestyny!



4) Answer this question.

Was Floyd's medical condition one in which would be called "an exceptional circumstance"?

If you ask me personally, I would say no it was BS to call it an exceptional circumstance.

As you are fully aware, a majority of athletes who must pass a certain weight limit are dehydrated as much as Floyd and factually way more than Floyd. So there was NOTHING exceptional about Floyd's situations.

BUT

How do you see it?

The way that you have been posting the last few days, you appear to be saying that Floyd's situation was not an exceptional circumstance.


.

[travestyny]

In your post you were not directly responding. You were bringing up other points that I listed. That is, you were DEFLECTING and making it appear that you were responding directly ....

Others may not realize your deflections but I know you ...... Actually, some people have begun to pick up on that too.

You make no sense. How am I not responding directly when I hit you with proof that you are wrong.

I also challenged you to quote me on what I said wrong, and you haven’t. I guess that means you are full of Shlt.

I told you over and over and over that the DCO can’t stop the session because of the reasons you gave. I told you it can be stopped when it is IMPOSSIBLE due to logistical reasons. I’ve told you that repeatedly.

Give up. It’s over.

[travestyny]

You are a keyboard warrior (ie. your gif) who DEFLECTs



Lets clear the air from the dirt that you have accumulated from all your digging:



1) WADA & USADA BOTH agree with me!!! (read quotes below. Yes, when the DCO determines to stop, the DCO sends the sample(s) collected whether they are DILUTED or NOT!!!

WRONG #1 BY YOU!!!!






AND this



In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory






2) The DCO can determine to stop the sample collection due to several reasons that COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN FLOYD'S CASE ..... and the determining factor could have been something other than what you point out here(over hydration/dehydration)!!!!

In my response to your question, I brought it up as a possible scenario. That the DCO could determine to stop and be providing only diluted samples.

Your response was like a dog trying to catch his tail!!!


WRONG #2 for being a dunce!!!




3) Over Hydration/dehydration could have been a contributing factor.

I remember even you and DoNothing bringing up why the delay was 6+ hours.
Remember that you guys said it more than likely took that long because of the probability that the urine was dilute and the DCO had to wait it out.

Now that you have read other cases, what could have happened is that Floyd gave multiple samples (some partial) and the DCO had no more (good) containers to continue.

Floyd requested that they call it a day and DCO agreed in this case and determined to call it a day.

This is a valid scenario as per the case that you even read.


WRONG AGAIN by Travestyny!



4) Answer this question.

Was Floyd's medical condition one in which would be called "an exceptional circumstance"?

If you ask me personally, I would say no it was BS to call it an exceptional circumstance.

As you are fully aware, a majority of athletes who must pass a certain weight limit are dehydrated as much as Floyd and factually way more than Floyd. So there was NOTHING exceptional about Floyd's situations.

BUT

How do you see it?

The way that you have been posting the last few days, you appear to be saying that Floyd's situation was not an exceptional circumstance.


.

This is exactly what I mean. A whole bunch of bullshlt. You are sinking. All of the quotations are here to be verified. I let you post and post until I knew you had nowhere to hide. That’s what happens when you are full of shlt.

Here are your statements. Your direct quotations:

j) Finally, it's not mandatory that the DCO take or should I say, have a SG reading. If Floyd is having trouble even producing a urine sample, then there would be no urine left over to test for SG ... DCO would put a note that its OK due to Floyd's BS dehydration and expect a TUE note from the FLoyd's doctor to explain all this.

THIS IS FALSE.

- If the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!

This is false.


No amount of your deflections are going to save you.

It’s over!


—edit—

Are you asking me if dehydration is an exceptional circumstance that would allow the DCO to stop the collection session? As I told you a billion times now, we both know that it is not. Is it clear?

Edit 2

Already explained why the containers excuse wouldn’t hold up. Go check my other posts. I explained that completely.

[travestyny]

if it's only legal to give a retro TUE if WADA monitors it as they stated

I stopped right there because you got this wrong already. Lol

Why don’t you ask your partner ADP02 if that’s what the statement says. He isn’t as dumb as you. If he is a stand up guy, he will tell you that you’re wrong.

Ask him!

[travestyny]

Jesus Christ!!! Now that I had a chance to read this more closely, what I want to know is HOW MANY LIES ARE YOU GOING TO TELL!???

I told you to stay away and give up but you couldn't, could you? Well prepare to get roasted and embarrassed yet again. (You should be used to me doing this to you by now!

1) WADA & USADA BOTH agree with me!!! (read quotes below. Yes, when the DCO determines to stop, the DCO sends the sample(s) collected whether they are DILUTED or NOT!!!

WRONG #1 BY YOU!!!!

WHEN DID I EVER SAY THAT DILUTED SAMPLES DON'T GO TO THE LABS? ****ING LIAR. QUOTE ME ON THAT, OR FOREVER LIVE YOUR LIFE AS A BlTCH.

Not only did I never say that the samples weren’t sent, I proved that I knew about that before you, you dlckhead.

HERE IT IS AGAIN. FROM JULY, YOU F@GGOT ASS LIAR:

From July!

if it doesn't pass it's not tested, flushing more traces out before a testable sample, do I have to explain everything to you gimp, back in the box now, there's a good boy

LMAOOOOO. WRONG AGAIN F@g. Go do some research. They get a new sample but they definitely test the first sample and all samples given.

SHUT THE **** UP. IM TIRED OF KICKING THE SHlT OUT OF YOU.

The DCO sends all Samples collected to the Laboratory for analysis, irrespective of whether or not the Samples meet the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...14_v1.0_en.pdf

THAT'S LIE #1 PROVEN WITH INDISPUTABLE FACTS, BlTCH!

AND this



In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory

OH REALLY. THEN HOW DO YOU RECONCILE THIS FROM WADA?:

9 The DCO is required to measure the sample’s specific gravity. If it does not meet certain requirements, you will be asked to provide another sample.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...-2015-code.pdf

SO WHO DO YOU BELIEVE...WADA....OR WADA...YOU DUMB BlTCH. YEA, YOU CONVENIENTLY WON'T EVEN LOOK AT THIS QUOTATION THAT I ALREADY GAVE YOU. AND I EXPLAINED IT TO YOU ALREADY.

2) The DCO can determine to stop the sample collection due to several reasons that COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN FLOYD'S CASE ..... and the determining factor could have been something other than what you point out here(over hydration/dehydration)!!!!

WHAT I POINT OUT???? WHAT I POINT OUT????? IT WAS WHAT YOU POINTED OUT YOU ****ING SCUM BAG. HERE IS THE PROOF!!!!

j) Finally, it's not mandatory that the DCO take or should I say, have a SG reading. If Floyd is having trouble even producing a urine sample, then there would be no urine left over to test for SG ... DCO would put a note that its OK due to Floyd's BS dehydration and expect a TUE note from the FLoyd's doctor to explain all this.

SO WHO SAID THEY COULD END IT DUE TO DEHYDRATION. THAT WOULD BE YOU.

In my response to your question, I brought it up as a possible scenario. That the DCO could determine to stop and be providing only diluted samples.

YOU ARE A ****ING LIAR. YOU NEVER SAID THAT IN RESPONSE TO MY QUESTIONS. YOU WOUND UP TRYING TO SNEAK THAT INTO YOUR POST TO KOOL, AND I CALLED YOU ON IT. AND NEVER EVER DID YOU SAY THAT IT WAS ONE SCENARIO WHEN THE DCO CAN STOP THE COLLECTION SESSION YOU ****ING PIECE OF SHlT LIAR. THE ONLY THING YOU SAID TO ME WAS THAT THE DCO DOESN'T NEED TO TAKE THE SPG TEST, WHICH IS ALSO A ****IG LIE!!!! HERE IS WHAT YOU SAID...TO KOOL:

HERE IS THE PROOF!

- If the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!

- As stated in previous posts, its possible that there is no specific gravity taken since Floyd had trouble producing enough urine to begin with!!! That is, there is not enough urine to fill up the sample A and B but adequate (60-90ml) but with no residual urine. Then calls it a day.

IS SAYING THAT THE DCO POSSIBLY CALLS IT A DAY DUE TO DEHYDRATION THE SAME AS SAYING "HERE IS ONE EXAMPLE OF WHERE THE DCO CAN CALL IT A DAY?" YOU DUMB BlTCH. NOT ONLY ARE YOU LYING, BUT YOU'RE STILL WRONG!

THIS IS WHERE YOU SAID THE DCO CAN STOP IT. AND BOTH OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE FALSE. I CALLED YOU OUT ON THAT SHlT, AND THE VERY FIRST TIME I CALLED YOU OUT ON IT, I SAID THAT THE ONLY WAY THE DCO CAN STOP IT IS IF COLLECTION BECOMES IMPOSSIBLE DUE TO LOGISTICAL REASONS. THEN YOU WENT OFF TALKING ABOUT THERE ARE TIMES WHEN THE DCO CAN END IT AND ALL THE TIME I WAS TELLING YOU.....I ALREADY TOLD YOU WHEN HE CAN END IT YOU MORON. SO YOU THOUGHT YOU TRAPPED ME IN SOMETHING AND I JUST LAUGHED AT YOU BECAUSE I KNEW I HAD THE UNEDITED POST THAT YOUR DUMB ASS DIDN'T READ!!!! WANT PROOF?

- If the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!

What the actual...HOLY SPECULATION. That is NOT how it works.

The DCO may end the Sample Collection Session if:
a. None of the Samples collected from the Athlete meet the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis; and
b. The DCO determines that for logistical reasons it is impossible to continue.

The DCO can end the collection if both of the above happen. And if they happened, then how the **** did USADA get a full sample, as was reported? On the contrary, they got a full sample, which means it was not diluted. There is no reason to believe otherwise, unless you subscribe in wild speculation.

THAT'S LIE #2 (that you brought it up to me the possible scenarios that the DCO can stop it) and LIE # 3 (that you brought it up at all that you were listing reasons that the DCO can stop it)BlTCH. WITH PROOF!!!

Your response was like a dog trying to catch his tail!!!


WRONG #2 for being a dunce!!!

WHO'S THE DUNCE NOW, BlTCH. I'M ****ING YOU UP WITH PROOF WHILE YOU KEEP TELLING LIES. BUT I'M NOT DONE WITH YOU.

I remember even you and DoNothing bringing up why the delay was 6+ hours.
Remember that you guys said it more than likely took that long because of the probability that the urine was dilute and the DCO had to wait it out.

Never EVER said that you lying prick. Lie #4

Now that you have read other cases, what could have happened is that Floyd gave multiple samples (some partial) and the DCO had no more (good) containers to continue.

Floyd requested that they call it a day and DCO agreed in this case and determined to call it a day.

This is a valid scenario as per the case that you even read.

False. And already wrote about this. HOW THE **** DOES THIS MAKE SENSE TO YOU, YOU ****ING CRACKHEAD. YOU'RE SAYING HE GAVE A SHlTLOAD OF PARTIAL SAMPLES AND THEY RAN OUT OF CONTAINERS? LMAOOOOOOOO. LOG THE **** OUT! The DCO goes with 3 collection vessels, 3 collection kits, partial collection kits....and you think they are going to run out and have to quit the session? This had NOTHING to do with the case I sent you. The case I sent, the dude threw 2 containers on the floor, and claimed a third one had a hole in the package. The DCO then ordered someone to bring more, and the athlete ran away before the person arrived.

How the **** did Floyd have no more good containers??? This would have been noted and sent to USADA, WADA, and possibly the lab as well. It would be uploaded onto the ADAM's database for all to see. So you're telling me the DCO would have had to purposely contaminate at least 2 sealed containers, somehow be responsible for this when they were previously packaged and checked, fill out a form with the sample kit numbers and state that they are contaminated, send this to USADA for their records and WADA for their records, placed on the ADAMS database, knowing that samples would be flagged by ADAMS for being diluted, not expect anyone to check into that. Partial samples are also on ADAMS, so why the **** would there be so many partial samples? One from being dehydrated, and that would be it. What the **** are you talking about??

WRONG AGAIN by Travestyny!

You’re embarrassing yourself. You haven’t proven me wrong about 1 thing. But I’ve proven you wrong and you won’t even go near your quotations again. Isn't that right, ADP02? Why won't you answer to your **** ups!!!!Lmaoooooo!!!

4) Answer this question.

Was Floyd's medical condition one in which would be called "an exceptional circumstance"?

If you ask me personally, I would say no it was BS to call it an exceptional circumstance.

As you are fully aware, a majority of athletes who must pass a certain weight limit are dehydrated as much as Floyd and factually way more than Floyd. So there was NOTHING exceptional about Floyd's situations.

BUT

How do you see it?

The way that you have been posting the last few days, you appear to be saying that Floyd's situation was not an exceptional circumstance.


.

Already answered. What the **** are you talking about? An exceptional circumstance that would make the DCO stop the collection session LIKE YOU CLAIMED! LMAO. LOG OFF!

STOP LYING BlTCH. THE QUOTATIONS ARE ALL HERE AND YOU CAN'T QUOTE ME IN ANYTHING I SUPPOSEDLY GOT WRONG. BUT I CAN QUOTE YOU ON WRONG SHlT, CANT I???


I PROVED YOU LIED MULTIPLE TIMES...ALL WITH PROOF. WHAT YOU GOT? QUOTE ME ON WHAT I SAID THAT WAS WRONG, BECAUSE I DAMN SURE QUOTED YOU ON WHAT YOU SAID THAT WAS WRONG MULTIPLE TIMES AND YOU IGNORE IT LIKE A PVSSY!

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/TUHInIQM4bXBS/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Shape up]

[QUOTE=travestyny;18188279]I stopped right there because you got this wrong already. Lol

Why don’t you ask your partner ADP02 if that’s what the statement says. He isn’t as dumb as you. If he is a stand up guy, he will tell you that you’re wrong.

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be monitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------denial won't help you junkie, don't have any gear for a couple of hours then read it again, WADA was quite clear in what they said, if your really that ****** then no one can help you, did you model yourself after fluid, you must be illiterate not to understand