Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

I stopped right there because you got this wrong already. Lol

Why don’t you ask your partner ADP02 if that’s what the statement says. He isn’t as dumb as you. If he is a stand up guy, he will tell you that you’re wrong.

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that [COLOR="red"]would be[/COLORmonitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------denial won't help you junkie, don't have any gear for a couple of hours then read it again, WADA was quite clear in what they said, if your really that ****** then no one can help you, did you model yourself after fluid, you must be illiterate not to understand

Go ask ADP02 if what you are saying is correct, since you are too bltch to accept the perma-ban challenge.

Actually, here. I'll mention him for you.

Yo, ADP02, we need you to confirm something.

In Shape Up's quotation, he says that WADA is saying that USADA broke their rules. Can you confirm this? Or is that not at all what the statement is saying?


Ok, Shape Up, let's see what happens. If your boy refuses to respond, it's because he feels sorry for you. Let's see if he answers.

[Shape up]

Go ask ADP02 if what you are saying is correct, since you are too bltch to accept the perma-ban challenge.

Actually, here. I'll mention him for you.

Yo, ADP02, we need you to confirm something.

In Shape Up's quotation, he says that WADA is saying that USADA broke their rules. Can you confirm this? Or is that not at all what the statement is saying?


Ok, Shape Up, let's see what happens. If your boy refuses to respond, it's because he feels sorry for you. Let's see if he answers.

WADA confirmed that under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code and the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions (ISTUE), a retroactive TUE can be granted for an IV drip to combat dehydration. “For a case that would be[/COLORmonitored by WADA, yes the ISTUE could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a WADA spokesperson told the Sports Integrity Initiative. however, the spokesperson added: “This case is not one that is monitored by WADA because the World Boxing Council is not a signatory to the Code. We understand that USADA was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE [COLOR="rgb(65, 105, 225)"]IN ADVANCE

[Shape up]

You and your gimps are the only ones who think they didn't, rules are specific and they say I'm right, I don't need anyone to qualify what the rules state dopey

[Shape up]

International Standards adopted pursuant to the Code are applicable as specified in this Agreement or otherwise provided in the Code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent that they do not conflict with the terms of this Agreement.-------the terms of the agreement are that they comply with articles 1 through 10 and 24.2---- they are the rules of the agreement so there is already inbuilt conflict gimp

[Shape up]

Conflict 30) if any rule or regulation whatsoever incorporated or referenced herein conflicts in any respect with the terms of this agreement, this agreement shall in all such respects control. Such rules and regulations include, but are not limited to; the CODE, the USADA Protocol, the WADA Prohibited list; the ISTUE and the ISTL. Nothing in this provision should be construed to permit a party to engage in any unlawful act pursuant to this agreementbut if they do something unlawful then the agreement take control and they cannot be found to be in violation of the CODE, the WADA prohibited list, the ISTUE and the ISTL

[Shape up]

What a mess.

So USADA finds itself in a situation where it is being paid directly by a fight promoter to test an athlete who does not fall under USADA's jurisdiction. Nonetheless, USADA announces sanctions and finds itself embroiled in a messy public spat. However this situation works itself out in the boxing world, the fallout for USADA could be much broader, now that it is much more in the public eye.

For USADA the lessons are clear. First, practice what you preach. Second, do not engage in a contractual relationship with individual athletes. Third, stick to your formal obligations under the mandate provided by the US Congress within the Olympic movement. If that mandate is to be expanded, request that such changes be formally adopted in the USADA governing charter.

USADA scored a big victory with its Reasoned Decision against Lance Armstrong. However, that does not mean that USADA is free from following rules or good practices. The mess that USADA finds itself in related to boxing suggests that the organization has some work to do to shore up its practices.

[travestyny]

wada confirmed that under the 2015 world anti-doping code and the international standard for the****utic use exemptions (istue), a retroactive tue can be granted for an iv drip to combat dehydration. “for a case that would be[/colormonitored by wada, yes the istue could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a wada spokesperson told the sports integrity initiative. However, the spokesperson added: “this case is not one that is monitored by wada because the world boxing council is not a signatory to the code. We understand that usada was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------iv infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique iv and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved tue [color="rgb(65, 105, 225)"]in advance

shut up, dummy. You have no idea what you are talking about.

from the istue:

4.3 An Athlete may only be granted retroactive approval for his/her The****utic Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (i.e., a retroactive TUE) if:

c. The applicable rules required the athlete (see comment to article 5.1) or permitted the athlete (see code article 4.4.5) to apply for a retroactive tue; or

code article 4.4.5

if an anti-doping organization chooses to collect a sample from a person who is not an international- level or national-level athlete, and that person is using a prohibited substance or prohibited method for the****utic reasons, the anti-doping organization may permit him or her to apply for a retroactive tue.

Don't write to me anymore unless you are willing to accept the perma-ban bet. You're not worth my time anymore you ****ing brainless waste of bone marrow. But by all means, ask ADP02 if you are right about WADA's statement. I want to see both of you idiots squirm. Either he ducks the question which shows that you are wrong, he disagrees with you which means you are wrong, or he agrees with you, in which case I'll laugh at both of you!!! You ever stop to think why he hasn't been saying the same dumb shlt as you, fool? He's not as ****** as you are. He's just a butthurt piece of shlt liar. On the other hand, you're just incredibly dumb.

[Shape up]

Originally Posted by shape up View Post
wada confirmed that under the 2015 world anti-doping code and the international standard for the****utic use exemptions (istue), a retroactive tue can be granted for an iv drip to combat dehydration. “for a case that would be monitored by wada, yes the istue could allow for intravenous infusions to be used in instances of dehydration”, a wada spokesperson told the sports integrity initiative. However, the spokesperson added: “this case is not one that is monitored by wada because the world boxing council is not a signatory to the code. We understand that usada was contracted to conduct the anti-doping program for this fight------iv infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique iv and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved tue in advance----------this is from the people who wrote the rules, i will take their statement before anything you say gimp

[Shape up]

International Standards adopted pursuant to the Code are applicable as specified in this Agreement or otherwise provided in the Code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent that they do not conflict with the terms of this Agreement.-------the terms of the agreement are that they comply with articles 1 through 10 and 24.2---- they are the rules of the agreement so there is already inbuilt conflict gimp -----------i can see how you are being smashed and dont want to try and answer any of these questions gimp, its hard when there is no answer that is within the rules

[Shape up]

Conflict 30) if any rule or regulation whatsoever incorporated or referenced herein conflicts in any respect with the terms of this agreement, this agreement shall in all such respects control. Such rules and regulations include, but are not limited to; the CODE, the USADA Protocol, the WADA Prohibited list; the ISTUE and the ISTL. Nothing in this provision should be construed to permit a party to engage in any unlawful act pursuant to this agreementbut if they do something unlawful then the agreement take control and they cannot be found to be in violation of the CODE, the WADA prohibited list, the ISTUE and the ISTL

again with this, fluid could have injected EPO and gotten away with it