Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[travestyny]

ALMOST FORGOT THIS ONE:

- If the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!

FLOYD'S CONDITION (DEHYDRATION) CAUSES THE DCO TO STOP THE SESSION AND HAND IN DILUTED (HYPER-HYDRATED) SAMPLES!!!


You have thoroughly embarrassed yourself. Log Off!!!

[Dosumpthin]

That is if it's deliberate DoNothing!


1) Floyd was allowed to drink and get IVs due to his BS medical condition and got a BS medical note from his doctor you .


2) There are circumstances where the DCO can determine to STOP even though all he has is dilute sample(s).


.

Funny how we all got here....

For YEARS part of your Floyd IV rhetoric was "Floyd delayed the test for 6 hours"

100's of post you spammed the same line "Floyd was allowed to delay".

I brought to your attention 2 things:

1. Floyd provided a sample prior to the IV - this sample was not suitable due to VOLUME.

2. The DCO is REQUIRED to collect a sample that meets SPG.


Now look at you. Now you are claiming "but but but.....the dco could've stopped if he wanted too".


Which conspiracy are you going with here? "Six hours to complete the sample process" conspiracy or "the DCO just called it a day and went home early" conspiracy?

Can't have both.

[ADP02]

Projecting. The projector is back!!!!! It's you that has nothing. I have two false statements by your desperate ass. Don't I? lmaoooooo!!!


WOULDN'T THESE TWO STATEMENTS AMOUNT TO NOTHING...BECAUSE THEY ARE FALSE!

WERE YOU WRONG, ADP02. I KNOW YOU CAN ADMIT IT, CAN'T YOU??????

YAWN ....

DEFLECTO STRIKES AGAIN!!!

AND YOU KNOW IT!!!!!


This post has NOTHING to do with what I'm calling you out for .... you got desperate and you DEFLECTED

[travestyny]

YAWN ....

DEFLECTO STRIKES AGAIN!!!

AND YOU KNOW IT!!!!!


This post has NOTHING to do with what I'm calling you out for .... you got desperate and you DEFLECTED

OH REALLY?


THEN CALL ME OUT FOR SOMETHING, FOOL. AND WATCH ME LAUGH WHEN YOU'RE PROVEN WRONG.

Haven't you been paying attention. You already tried that. I called your bluff and proved you lied. You wanna go through that again?

[Dosumpthin]

Man, I do not want to go there but often you sound just like Travestyny. Besides him, you are the only one that came up with that BS statement ... then he comes right back and responds to your BS statements. Anyhoot, you guys are all Floyd fans .... you think alike I guess!





1) When it doesn't suit you Floyd fans, you avoid listening to Floyd's interviews because you know the BS that comes from them and it's very hard to back his statements up.

very few Floyd fans went along with his BS such as giving urine contributed to his extreme dehydration


The point here though is that Floyd brings up that his extreme dehydration was due to giving blood 10 days before, giving urine and training which he admits in his other interviews that all he was doing was staying sharp his final days and RELAXING. So to say, no Floyd's dehydration was NOT due to diarrhea.







but just for laughs, even lets say it was due to diarrhea ... it still comes down to the same denominator. Floyd weighed in at the weigh-in just like he always does.


Here is what they say about someone with dehydration. The context below is mainly due to diarrhea but even here, Floyd's weight should be way below 146!!!!



"Deciding how much IV fluid to give

If possible, patients with severe dehydration should be weighed so that their fluid requirements can be determined accurately.

The fluid deficit in severe dehydration equals about 10% of body weight (i.e., 100 ml/kg)."



"Adults should be given IV fluid at a rate of 30 ml/kg within 30 minutes, followed by 70 ml/kg in the next 2.5 hours, thus providing a total of 100 ml/kg in 3 hours."



See. Even though it's not due to diarrhea, Floyd still would have to have lost more than 10% of his body weight!!!

After drinking adequately, Floyd was at 1%? 0%? deficit?


Here they called this PLAN C (use IV).
"

•shift to Treatment Plan B or A when the child is no longer severely dehydrated;"

Plan A and B indicates to just drink fluids!!!


Finally, if you calculate 100ml/kg IV that would be a lot more than the 750ml given to Floyd. So even here, it makes no sense!

Sorry but Floyd's excuses is a bunch of LIES!!!





.

Lol. You too? Alternate accusations? Damn. You got you asses kicked that bad?

Let me explain this to you.

I speak facts. I give an opinion based on facts. Logical people tend to have similar opinions when that happens.

You and the rest of the pact@rds?.....you all go for gaining approval of your opinion 1st - the facts don't matter. You rejoice when idiots like spoon rath Lou chipher agree with you.

You're more concerned with how many people agree with you than factual information.

That's why you pact@rds all go with the "alternate account" accusations. As if it changes any of the facts presented. It doesn't. You think if people like your post it makes what you are saying correct. No.




Now. Diarrhea.

Every WADA rule
Every supporting medical document
Every interview snippet

You posted 100s of times to support your conspiracy all have said diarrhea as a possible cause to use an IV.

That is a fact.

I'm not saying Floyd had the shlts. Just pointing out reason why medical records would be needed before condemning the IV use.

Pretty sure Travestny AGREES with that specific point in the post. You missed that part.


Instead acknowledging the need of medical records you spam Floyds 30 day weight for 1000s of post to support your agenda and gain internet approval.


Fact is you don't know. None of us do. Fact is it could've been caused by diarrhoea. Accept that you don't have access to the medical records for the TUE and it's the LAW. Accept that the people who need to make the call have access and they all APPROVE OF THE IV.


(Now spam the Floyd video where he says he's old as a reason for dehydration)

[Shape up]

It's in front of your face, ******.

The contract says USADA Protocol section 5, right? Yes or no?

USADA Protocol section 5 says Annex A, right? Yes or no?

USADA Protocol Annex A says the WADA Codes, right? Yes or no?


It's ok to admit that you are wrong now. You did it before. Let's hear you do it again!

Rules
4) Mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantive anti doping rules for all purposesin relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. 5) mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")(which may be found at http://www.usada.org/we-content/uplo...A_protocol.pfd) shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any results management services provided hereunder. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. now let's look at these 2 rules, in rule 4 it references WADA when it talks about code, in the same rule it states ANNEX A, it doesn't mention USADA in this rule so as far as I am concerned it will be referencing WADA ANNEX A which is completely different to USADA annex A, as you should be able to understand, usada protocol is covered in rule 5 and only covers movement testing. You will also notice it states in rule 4 " INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ADOPTED" so that qualifies this fight as an international athlete level event, ANY THING ELSE I CAN SET YOU STRAIGHT ON KNOBJOCKEY

[travestyny]

Rules
4) mayweather and pacquaio agree that articles 1 through 10 and 24.2, and the associated definitions, of the world anti doping code (the code)(which can be found at https://www.wada-ama.org/en/what-we-do/the-code) shall be the substantive anti doping rules for all purposesin relation to the competition and the period of pre and post competition testing provided for in this agreement and ANNEX Aand that such rules shall apply directly to mayweather and pacquaio who consent to be bound by these rules. international standards adopted pursuant to the code are applicable as specified in this agreement or otherwise provided in the code. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. 5) mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")(which may be found at http://www.usada.org/we-content/uplo...A_protocol.pfd) shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any results management services provided hereunder. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. now let's look at these 2 rules, in rule 4 it references WADA when it talks about code, in the same rule it states ANNEX A, it doesn't mention USADA in this rule so as far as I am concerned it will be referencing WADA ANNEX A which is completely different to USADA annex A, as you should be able to understand, usada protocol is covered in rule 5 and only covers movement testing. You will also notice it states in rule 4 " INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ADOPTED" so that qualifies this fight as an international athlete level event, ANY THING ELSE I CAN SET YOU STRAIGHT ON KNOBJOCKEY

LMAOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! LOG THE **** OUT, IDIOT. You were done a long time ago.


Do you know what an international standard is?

What does ISTUE stand for?

What does ISTI stand for?


Come back when you found out what these mean, then pull that c@ck out ya mouf and apologize for being so dumb.

[travestyny]

mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")

now let's look at these 2 rules, in rule 4 it references WADA when it talks about code, in the same rule it states ANNEX A, it doesn't mention USADA in this rule so as far as I am concerned it will be referencing WADA ANNEX A

Go read USADA Protocol Section 5. Post it up, and tell me what it says.

Then apologize for being an idiot.

[Shape up]

LMAOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! LOG THE **** OUT, IDIOT. You were done a long time ago.


Do you know what an international standard is?

What does ISTUE stand for?

What does ISTI stand for?


Come back when you found out what these mean, then pull that c@ck out ya mouf and apologize for being so dumb.

under international standards USADA cannot give floyd a retro TUE without WADA monitoring it you dumb ***er

[Shape up]

5) mayweather and pacquaio agree that sections 5, 9-13, 16, 17(a) and 21 of the United States anti doping agency protocol for Olympic and Paralympic movement testing (the "USADA PROTOCOL")(which may be found at http://www.usada.org/we-content/uplo...A_protocol.pfd) shall constitute the procedural rules applicable to any results management services provided hereunder. These provisions shall apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the terms of this agreement. This provision shall survive termination of this agreement. no need for any other comment, there is the loophole, just as there is a loophole in rule 4 ******, Fluid IVayweather is a PED cheat and you cannot prove me wrong you nuffy window licker