Originally posted by adp02
View Post
Originally posted by travestyny
View Post
answer up to this, son.
:
If the dco’s specific gravity reading indicates that the sample doesn’t have a suitable specific gravity for analysis, then the dco informs the athlete that he/she is required to provide a further sample.
The athlete’s responsible for providing a sample with a suitable specific gravity for analysis.
The dco is to wait as long as necessary to collect such a sample.
The athlete shall be provided with the opportunity to hydrate, but advised not to hydrate excessively, due to the requirement to provide a sample with a suitable specific gravity for analysis.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...14_v1.0_en.pdf
requirement: A thing that is compulsory. A necessary condition.
If the dco’s specific gravity reading indicates that the sample doesn’t have a suitable specific gravity for analysis, then the dco informs the athlete that he/she is required to provide a further sample.
The athlete’s responsible for providing a sample with a suitable specific gravity for analysis.
The dco is to wait as long as necessary to collect such a sample.
The athlete shall be provided with the opportunity to hydrate, but advised not to hydrate excessively, due to the requirement to provide a sample with a suitable specific gravity for analysis.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...14_v1.0_en.pdf
requirement: A thing that is compulsory. A necessary condition.
YAWN .... same song and dance by you!
See, back to "requirements" and DCO has to ...... but there was always the point about exceptions in which was your DOWNFALL! You cannot get out of that!
Sorry .... YOU WERE WRONG!!! The DCO could have STOPPED but you made that big song and dance and now trying to get out of it by saying what you are saying! LOL
Could Floyd have had diluted full (90ml) samples sent to the LAB only due to circumstances? Either you are now agreeing with me or YOU ARE WRONG!!!
Time to DIG???? I say YES!!!
Comment