Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail

[Shape up]

Straight from the fight contract------------ set forth the procedures by which Mayweather and Pacquiao may apply to USADA for a theraputic use exemption ("TUE") to use any prohibited substance or method during the Testing Period,except that USADA shall make the final determination on any Application for a TUE. USADA's decision on any TUE application shall be final without any right of appeal

By the way this is USADA's contract what a classic, the mob you've been fighting for sold you down the creek

[Shape up]

How embarrassed must you 2 kokroaches be hahahahahahahaha

[Dosumpthin]

Have no idea what you are talking about, but I do know I turned you into a straight bltch who began begging men to play dress up in pink clothes with you. Didn’t that happen?





I guess you never recovered from that, huh?


Or are you mad about one of the other times I kicked your face in? Or are you feeling left out because I left you off my sig? Remember these?





Or is this just another case of you trying to cut with butter? Lmaoooooo




If I were you?, I’d also hate someone who has embarrassed you as much as I have. I know. I know. Go cry on your alt ADP02’s shoulder.

Adp02 is a full pact@rd but to call him SPOONS alternate account......

I thought to myself ...."that's a bit harsh. Spoon is a certified weirdo"




But then I remembered ADP02 and his infamous "WHIZZINATOR" qoute.




Damn. They are both ****ed in the head.


Carry on destroying what's left of their miserable life.

[koolkc107]

Embarrassed?

Not at all.

Not when you are helping to prove that there really was nothing that failed to be above board and transparent.

Nice color for your big font, BTW.

Maybe you are trying to overcompensate for something? A lack of a real argument probably.

Of course USADA would make the final decision.

Isn't that what all WADA signatories do when they test athletes?

However, that doesn't mean WADA can't review those final decisions, find them corrupt, then suspend the signatory.

Like they did RUSADA.

It's been 2 and a half years and in that time WADA has busted signatories left and right.

But not USADA.

Cause USADA is the gold standard.

Always has been and still is.

Thank you for helping to prove Mayweather did not cheat.

Good work.

How embarrassed must you 2 kokroaches be hahahahahahahaha

[Dosumpthin]

[QUOTE=Shape up;18146825]Again more rubbish, there is a clear rule in place, arum and pacquaio were subject to a confidentiality clause, which means they were not allowed to raise the subject of the TUE, it's funny to see you weasels squirm and try and pass what you assume a rule means as a fact, fact was there was no sign of dehydration, fact we only have usada and floyds word that this is how it happened, fact usada has been shady in the past with morales, fact for the good of the athlete the NSAC should have been notified, fact fluid saw a doctor 2 hours before an IV was performed in his lounge room, fact he was not sent to hospital, fact floyd said it was just rehydration, fact, usada should be sanctioned for a TUE for mild dehydration, fact a retro tue can only be issued for an IV to combat dehydration if WADA monitors it.


YOU POST A WHOLE BUNCH OF BULLSHlT - but this one stands out and really exposes you for being an agenda driven pact@rd.



We also have THOMAS HAUSER HIMSELF TELLING YOU THIS IS HOW IT WENT DOWN.

"There’s one significant correction in it that I accept. Prior to USADA’s September 17 statement, it was widely believed that its doping control officer went to Mayweather’s Las Vegas home to conduct an unannounced drug test and found evidence of an IV being administered to Mayweather. USADA maintains – and I will accept - that “Mr. Mayweather declared the infusion in advance to the USADA DCO.”

http://www.boxnation.com/boxing-news/was-floyd-mayweather-really-dehydrated-the-fallout-from-can-boxing-trust-usada/


So here we have Thomas Hauser who created a media frenzy by reporting "the DCO found evidence of an IV" only to turn around and admit he was wrong and it was a rumor he heard - LMAO - yet somehow you ignore the rumor starter admitting he was wrong and claim it's Floyd and USADA who is lying?


Lol.


****** idiot.

[travestyny]

YES!!! YOU ARE!!! YES YOU ARE HAHAHA!!!

I just broke your pussay again hahahaha!!

Shyits too easy!! haha!!

Didn't even break a sweat. I didn't even need to ask you the hard question. Your vagina just broke like a scared little biatch hahaha!! Man it's like you just opened up to the world. You are not anymore a closet **** hahahaha!!

Gotcha!

Congratulations Travestyny! Like I said enjoy living in ***** st.

You're trying too hard, bltch Unlike you, I don't have to falsify quotations.


This is probably the funniest shyt you've ever typed here. Definitely a keeper.

i dared you to ask me to ask you the question that will make you duck.

Thanks for consistently giving us someone to laugh at and beat up on. We salute you for your sacrifice, though you can't help it. You're simply a moron.

[Shape up]

Embarrassed?

Not at all.

Not when you are helping to prove that there really was nothing that failed to be above board and transparent.

Nice color for your big font, BTW.

Maybe you are trying to overcompensate for something? A lack of a real argument probably.

Of course USADA would make the final decision.

Isn't that what all WADA signatories do when they test athletes?

However, that doesn't mean WADA can't review those final decisions, find them corrupt, then suspend the signatory.

Like they did RUSADA.

It's been 2 and a half years and in that time WADA has busted signatories left and right.

But not USADA.

Cause USADA is the gold standard.

Always has been and still is.

Thank you for helping to prove Mayweather did not cheat.

Good work.

Keep embarrassing yourself ******, don't you understand that usada never has the final decision with no right of appeal, you have been crushed you eunuch, crawl back from where you came from and lick your wounds you gimp, your obviously too embarrassed to use your other alt ******ny

[koolkc107]

Keep embarrassing yourself ******, don't you understand that usada never has the final decision with no right of appeal,

Why would professional boxers need any further authority than the ADO, in this case USADA?

You been reading too many cycling articles.

This isn't gymnastics, or amateur boxing where an appeals process is in place that ends with WADA.

This is a pro sport with no central authority.

So again, of course THESE ATHLETES would have the ADO as the final authority.

That is exactly what they are hired to be.

Shake yourself.

[travestyny]

8. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF WADA IN THE REVIEW OF TUES? UP

WADA’s role in the TUE process is two-fold. First, the Agency, through its TUEC, has the right to monitor and review any TUE granted by a federation or anti-doping organization and, following such review, to reverse any decision. Second, an athlete who submits a TUE Application to a federation or anti-doping organization and is denied a TUE, can ask WADA to review the decision. In certain cases, WADA must review TUE decisions of IFs and it may review other TUE decisions. If WADA determines that the denial of the TUE did not comply with the ISTUE, the Agency can reverse the decision.any more questions you 2 weasels, consider yourselves squashed like the annoying bugs you are

How dumb can you be? Did you actually read what you copy and pasted??? LMAO

You still haven't responded to this:

FROM THE ISTUE

5.4 Each National Anti-Doping Organization, International Federation and Major Event Organization must promptly report (in English or French) all decisions of its TUEC granting or denying TUEs, and all decisions to recognize or refusing to recognize other Anti-Doping Organizations' TUE decisions, through ADAMS or any other system approved by WADA. In respect of TUEs granted, the information reported shall include (in English or French)...

WADA may review any other TUE decisions at any time, whether upon request by those affected or on its own initiative. If the TUE decision being reviewed meets the criteria set out in the International Standard for The****utic Use Exemptions, WADA will not interfere with it. If the TUE decision does not meet those criteria, WADA will reverse it.

or this from the contract:

Arbitration before the AAA in accordance with the terms of the USADA Protocol, as modified herein, shall be the exclusive means of resolving any dispute related to or arising from: this Agreement, any sample collection or testing conduct by USADA or its agents, any analysis by the testing laboratory, any matter related to the TUE or Results Management Services or any other matter involving USADA or any athlete’s eligibility pursuant to sport drug testing or the terms of this Agreement.

or this:

Manny Pacquiao asked for the changes, accepted them, signed, and then Mayweather accepted. Just like USADA said

[travestyny]

Q

Keep embarrassing yourself ******, don't you understand that usada never has the final decision with no right of appeal, you have been crushed you eunuch, crawl back from where you came from and lick your wounds you gimp, your obviously too embarrassed to use your other alt ******ny

Who the **** ever brought up appealing? Only you, you dope head. Why the **** would it be expected that anyone would appeal to WADA if a tue WAS GRANTED. You're a moron.

The only reason to appeal would be if it is NOT GRANTED. Pacquiao could appeal if he thought anything was done wrong. He can't appeal that Mayweather had been granted a TUE (the **** is he going to argue? That it was done wrong based on the medical information that he doesn't have???). But he can take up any concern he had with an arbitrator, as is mentioned int he contract, or with NSAC.

Furthermore, according to the rules, all applications by the USADA TUEC are uploaded to ADAMS. Nothing in the contract says that is not the case, but the ISTUE makes that clear.

It was already stated that the ISTUE was the only thing mentioned in the first contract, then PACQUIAO asked for some changes. He accepted and then Mayweather signed off after the changes were made.

Explain this: