Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Here's Where All The Floyd Cheat Theories Fail
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostThanks Spoon!
Yup, he just cannot stand nor admit that he was wrong!
Travestyny is a gift that keeps on giving.
It never ends, but that's what makes him fun, you can break her over and over hahaha!!
Last edited by Spoon23; 11-03-2017, 11:11 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostMay I remind you that I was the one that gave you a list of about 15 points and told you that this is one of the possibilities. YOU said that the DCO is required to get a sample and cannot stop.
Well, the DCO can determine to STOP and then provides the samples that he does have even if all of the samples are diluted, as an example. As I stated and as stated by WADA and USADA!!!!
You are trying to get out of a hole by digging into it DEEPER ......
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/URoLoCo1s9jm8/*****.gif[/IMG]
.
You know it and I know it. If you had one that makes sense, let me know. I've been waiting for you to say anything that makes sense. You said the DCO can stop it because of HIS CONDITION. That's clearly bullshlt you dope head.Last edited by travestyny; 11-04-2017, 02:07 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostYAWN .....
and
Even in the case that you brought up, they mention that the DCO could have stopped it if he wanted to!
SO THANKs!!!!
AND
AND this
In the above quote, the key word is "may be". So it's not mandatory
Man, how far have you DUG?
Continue!
DEEPER, WIDER, FASTER.............
.
.
Did you read anything that I wrote, dumbass????
1.
The World Anti-Doping Code sets out rules that you, as an athlete, must follow. The point of this guide is to help you understand the rules.
9 The DCO is required to measure the sample’s specific gravity. If it does not meet certain requirements, you will be asked to provide another sample.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...-2015-code.pdf
So if you want to keep posting your quotation, I can keep posting this one. But what's the point? I already showed you that the code trumps both quotations. Yea, you didn't eve respond to that, did you?
2. The case said that the DCO can stop the session IF HE AGREES WITH THE ATHLETE THAT THE CONTAINERS WERE CONTAMINATED. DOES THAT ****ING SOUND LIKE HE WOULD BE ABLE TO STOP IT FOR AN ATHELTE BEING DEHYDRATED YOU MORON? Jesus Christ you are a moron.
If he stopped it because the bottles were contaminated, he would have to put this in the DCO report form, take note of the number on the containers that were contaminated, and send this to USADA, the lab, and WADA. If the containers are contaminated, THEY MIGHT NOT GET A SAMPLE AT ALL, you idiot. And if they already have one sample and need another but find out that the containers are contaminated (if they decide not to get more, as in the case I sent you), then this still wouldn't work you dopehead. A. The DCO and USADA would have to explain why the containers were checked off on as being fine before the session, were transported in a container that would protect it, but are now suddenly contaminated. The containers would then be checked. The DCO would have to answer for that and could be in big trouble if it's found it he purposely did something to the containers. It makes no ****ing sense moron.
So again, tell me what situation would they be stopping Floyd's session. Let's see you "dig" yourself out of that. I'll wait....
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostDid you read anything that I wrote, dumbass????
1.
So if you want to keep posting your quotation, I can keep posting this one. But what's the point? I already showed you that the code trumps both quotations. Yea, you didn't eve respond to that, did you?
2. The case said that the DCO can stop the session IF HE AGREES WITH THE ATHLETE THAT THE CONTAINERS WERE CONTAMINATED. DOES THAT ****ING SOUND LIKE HE WOULD BE ABLE TO STOP IT FOR AN ATHELTE BEING DEHYDRATED YOU MORON? Jesus Christ you are a moron.
If he stopped it because the bottles were contaminated, he would have to put this in the DCO report form, take note of the number on the containers that were contaminated, and send this to USADA, the lab, and WADA. If the containers are contaminated, THEY MIGHT NOT GET A SAMPLE AT ALL, you idiot. And if they already have one sample and need another but find out that the containers are contaminated (if they decide not to get more, as in the case I sent you), then this still wouldn't work you dopehead. A. The DCO and USADA would have to explain why the containers were checked off on as being fine before the session, were transported in a container that would protect it, but are now suddenly contaminated. The containers would then be checked. The DCO would have to answer for that and could be in big trouble if it's found it he purposely did something to the containers. It makes no ****ing sense moron.
So again, tell me what situation would they be stopping Floyd's session. Let's see you "dig" yourself out of that. I'll wait....
Unless you believe that everyone else is wrong and you are right?
What is so hard for you to understand? Read below statements. I listed it as one possible scenario and YOU said that DCO cannot stop bla, bla bla ....
I told you that YOU ARE WRONG. There are circumstances where the DCO can STOP and send off only the samples that the DCO collected at that point in time.
Perhaps you do not understand the statements below. It's OK ...
WADA
G.4.6 The DCO should continue to collect additional Samples until the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis is met, or until the DCO determines that there are exceptional circumstances which mean that for logistical reasons it is impossible to continue with the Sample Collection Session. Such exceptional circumstances shall be documented accordingly by the DCO. (Let me remind you, the Doping Control form and Sample Collection form are sent to WADA via ADAMS)
Even in the case that you brought up, they mention that the DCO could have stopped it if he wanted to!
SO THANKs!!!!
"The Panel notes Article D.4.4 in Annex D of the IST, which states as follows:
“…If the Athlete is not satisfied with any of the equipment available for selection, this shall be recorded by the DCO.
If the DCO does not agree with the Athlete that all of the equipment available for the selection is unsatisfactory, the DCO shall instruct the Athlete to proceed with the Sample Collection Session.
If the DCO agrees with the Athlete that all of the equipment available for the selection is unsatisfactory, the DCO shall terminate the collection of the Athlete’s urine Sample and this shall be recorded by the DCO”.
WADA
"The DCO sends all Samples collected to the Laboratory for analysis, irrespective of whether or not the Samples meet the requirement for Suitable Specific Gravity for Analysis."
USADA
"The DCO will check the specific gravity (concentration) of the sample. Additional samples may be requested if the sample is not within the required range."
Man, how far have you DUG?
Continue!
DEEPER, WIDER, FASTER.............
Comment
-
GOTCHA!!!! I KNEW THE MORE THAT YOU TYPE, SOONER OR LATER YOU WERE GOING TO **** UP AND SHOW THE LYING PIECE OF SHlT THAT YOU ARE!!!
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostSo I am right. There are circumstances where the DCO sends to the LAB only samples that do not even meet Suitable Specific Gravity.
What you said is that they need to include a urine sample that passes the SG test.
I stated that there are circumstances where the DCO determines otherwise.
Read it (see above quotes) and weep. WADA/USADA agree with what I said.
Who was right? ADP02
Who was wrong? travestynyOriginally posted by ADP02 View PostMay I remind you that I was the one that gave you a list of about 15 points and told you that this is one of the possibilities. YOU said that the DCO is required to get a sample and cannot stop.
.
Originally posted by ADP02 View Postj) Finally, it's not mandatory that the DCO take or should I say, have a SG reading. If Floyd is having trouble even producing a urine sample, then there would be no urine left over to test for SG ... DCO would put a note that its OK due to Floyd's BS dehydration and expect a TUE note from the FLoyd's doctor to explain all this.
Originally posted by ADP02 View Post- As stated in previous posts, its possible that there is no specific gravity taken since Floyd had trouble producing enough urine to begin with!!! That is, there is not enough urine to fill up the sample A and B but adequate (60-90ml) but with no residual urine. Then calls it a day.
WRONG. It IS mandatory for the DCO to take the SG!
THIS PROVES YOU WRONG:
9 The DCO is required to measure the sample’s specific gravity. If it does not meet certain requirements, you will be asked to provide another sample.
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...-2015-code.pdf
Originally posted by travestyny View PostLet's Call it a day, Floyd! We don't have a drop for the refractometer!
Originally posted by ADP02 View Post- If the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!
Are you still confused? You tried to DEFLECT and say that you said simply that the DCO could send in urine samples that didn't fall within range. But you ****ed up. Your quotations are above and accurate. Try to "dig" your way out of that fool!!!!
WHEN I ****ING RESPONDED TO YOU INITIALLY, I already showed you that the DCO can stop the session when collection becomes IMPOSSIBLE DUE TO LOGISTICAL REASONS. I'VE ALSO ALREADY PROVEN THAT I WAS ALREADY AWARE THAT SAMPLES GO TO THE LAB EVEN IF THEY ARE DILUTED, DUMMY. THAT DOES NOT MEAN THEY STOP THE PROCESS OF GETTING AN UNDILUTED SAMPLE, UNLESS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE! I'VE STATED THIS OVER AND OVER CLEARLY!!! AND NO, IT IS NOT IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE THE ATHLETE IS OVERHYDRATED OR DEHYDRATED, YOU MORON! WHAT YOU SAID ABOVE MAKES NO SENSE!
YOU'RE WRONG IDIOT. DEFLECT YOUR WAY OUT OF THAT!
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/*****.gif[/IMG]Last edited by travestyny; 11-03-2017, 11:23 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostEven in the case that you brought up, they mention that the DCO could have stopped it if he wanted to!
SO THANKs!!!!
Still waitinggggggg......where does it say that he can stop it "if he wanted to." LMAOOOO.
Or are you talking about stopping it if he agrees that the sample collection containers are contaminated? (which is NOT what you originally said, but still just as moronic.) You expect that in Floyd Mayweather's case, a DCO now claimed that 2 sealed sample collection kits were contaminated and they were thus unable to continue???? And these kits were not only recorded by number by the DCO, but this information was sent to USADA for their records and WADA for their records?????
IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. WOWWWWW. YOUR DESPERATION IS GROWING. KEEP IT UP, ******!!!
BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU ORIGINALLY SAID. OH NO. ARE YOU BACKING AWAY FROM YOUR STATEMENT NOW?
HERE IS WHAT WE LEARN FROM THE CASE THAT PROVES YOU WRONG!
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostIf the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!
Here is the standard:
As established in CAS jurisprudence, the defence of compelling justification of the refusal to submit to sample collection is to be interpreted restrictively. The logic of the anti-doping tests demands and expects that whenever physically, hygienically and morally possible, the sample be provided despite objections by the athlete.
Let's hear your argument that BASED ON HIS CONDITION, IT CAN BE ARGUED THAT IT WAS PHYSICALLY, HYGIENICALLY, AND MORALLY NOT POSSIBLE FOR FLOYD TO GIVE THE SAMPLE.
YOU ****ED UP, DUMMY! AND YES, YOU'RE WRONG, YET AGAIN.
[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]Last edited by travestyny; 11-03-2017, 07:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by adp02 View Postj) finally, it's not mandatory that the dco take or should i say, have a sg reading. if floyd is having trouble even producing a urine sample, then there would be no urine left over to test for sg ... Dco would put a note that its ok due to floyd's bs dehydration and expect a tue note from the floyd's doctor to explain all this.Originally posted by ADP02 View PostIf the DCO does do a specific gravity and it's too dilute, then there is also the possibility that for either that sample or the next, the DCO calls it a day and reports the situation of Floyd's condition (DEHYDRATION) as reasons for the delay. Yet, the sample may actually be too dilute!Originally posted by adp02 View Postwell, the dco can determine to stop and then provides the samples that he does have even if all of the samples are diluted, as an example. As i stated and as stated by wada and usada!!!!
.Another dumb **** up by you, you big idiot!!!!
Ok. Now tell me. How does the DCO stop a urine collection session due to an athlete being dehydrated.....but then hand in the diluted (hyper-hydrated) urine samples!!!!???
[img]https://media.*****.com/media/l3E6uhDAN3W7vylji/*****.gif[/img]Last edited by travestyny; 11-03-2017, 11:46 PM.
Comment
-
Comment