Comments Thread For: Whyte: Deontay Wilder 'An Embarrassement to Heavyweight Boxing'

[soul_survivor]

I can easily list 10 WBC champs worse than Wilder.

Bruce Seldon

Billy Backus

Leon Spinks

Wanheng Menayothin

Hacine Cherifi

Saensak Muangsurin

Dave Hilton, Jr.

Keith Mullings

Javier Castillejo

Luis Santana

That's just 10 that you asked for. I can list a lot more than that.

Explain how these fighter enhance the "great history" of the WBC that you speak of. Or how they are better than Wilder.

Don't bother asking me about world class opponents until you learn the definition of what a world class opponent is.

Bruce Seldon never held the WBC crown. At no point did he hold nay portion of the heavyweight title for 3 04 mroe years. His resume however ****s all over Wilder. Winning or losing, Seldon had mroe balls than a life time of Wilder.

Backus at no point held any version of the welter crown for 3 or more years and when he won the UNDISPUTED welterweight crown, he did so against ATG Napolse. That already puts him in a whole different bracket to the Bronze Bummer. A tiny little bit of research owuld have yielded you with this obvious info.

I think you're a troll if you can't even figure this out and it's clear you have zero knowledge of boxing. Please don't make me embarass you like I do your ilk by posting threads aimed at exposing liars and frauds. I can easily make a poll on which is the single best win Brackus > Napoles or Wilder > Stiverne.

So just be quiet at stay out of my way.

[alexguiness]

Wilder is a terrible champion because he hides behind his ridiculous rhetoric.

[joseph5620]

Bruce Seldon never held the WBC crown. At no point did he hold nay portion of the heavyweight title for 3 04 mroe years. His resume however ****s all over Wilder. Winning or losing, Seldon had mroe balls than a life time of Wilder.

Backus at no point held any version of the welter crown for 3 or more years and when he won the UNDISPUTED welterweight crown, he did so against ATG Napolse. That already puts him in a whole different bracket to the Bronze Bummer. A tiny little bit of research owuld have yielded you with this obvious info.

I think you're a troll if you can't even figure this out and it's clear you have zero knowledge of boxing. Please don't make me embarass you like I do your ilk by posting threads aimed at exposing liars and frauds. I can easily make a poll on which is the single best win Brackus > Napoles or Wilder > Stiverne.

So just be quiet at stay out of my way.

Backus held both the WBC and the WBA titles. So stop lying about him never holding any version of the welterweight crown. He was a second rate fighter who won the title on cuts in a fight he was clearly losing. Napoles known for cutting fairly easily. If you think Backus was better than Wilder that only shows how ignorant you are. In the rematch he was beaten soundly.


Seldon's resume does not crap on Wilder's. If you think so, please explain how it does. Box rec doesn't tell you these things. But unfortunately that's your source for information which shows because you never know what you're talking about. That's why you sent me red K.


Seldon was WBA champion yes, but the point stands that he was worse than Wilder. You would actually have to know who he was as a fighter without looking up his record as you pathetically did.

[soul_survivor]

Backus held both the WBC and the WBA titles. So stop lying about him never holding any version of the welterweight crown. He was a second rate fighter who won the title on cuts in a fight he was clearly losing. Napoles known for cutting fairly easily. If you think Backus was better than Wilder that only shows how ignorant you are. In the rematch he was beaten soundly.


Seldon's resume does not crap on Wilder's. If you think so, please explain how it does. Box rec doesn't tell you these things. But unfortunately that's your source for information which shows because you never know what you're talking about. That's why you sent me red K.


Seldon was WBA champion yes, but the point stands that he was worse than Wilder. You would actually have to know who he was as a fighter without looking up his record as you pathetically did.

You might want to learn ow to read better.

Look, you're clearly a troll who has not backed up anything you have claimed.

Now go away you idiot, thinking Seldon held the wbc title, what a ******. Don't make you embarass you. This is your last warning.

[soul_survivor]

Wilder is a terrible champion because he hides behind his ridiculous rhetoric.

The rhetoric that his fans have helped create.

[original zero]

it's the haters hiding behind rhetoric.

wilder has the top belt. the only thing worth chasing is the other belts. arum blocked parker from fighting him and joshua won't be available for a long time.

all wilder can do is keep the belt warm and wait. if ortiz gets the WBA belt, they can unify.

[joseph5620]

You might want to learn ow to read better.

Look, you're clearly a troll who has not backed up anything you have claimed.

Now go away you idiot, thinking Seldon held the wbc title, what a ******. Don't make you embarass you. This is your last warning.

At "last warning." In other words you have nothing to say.. Backus was champion at welterweight abd part of that was the WBC belt fool. Again, you're the fool that talks about fights and fighters that you know nothing about. Not surprising when you think Khan ranks higher at 140 than Crawford.

My mistake with Seldon. Yes he held WBA title. I should have relied on box rec like you That's one fighter out of the 10 I have listed like asked for. If that's all you have then it speaks for itself LOL.

Stop pretending that you know what you're talking about when you clearly don't. Learn the definition of "world class" too.

[tokon]

With promoters can you ever trust them? No, if this was a deal without any options, King willing to step aside etc and Wilder still says no then it's ducking 💯

Yes, at that point, its a "duck"!

However, I think it is highly unlikely that Hearns will offer that kind of money for Wilder-Whyte without options as Whyte is just a lure to allow Hearns control of the REAL fight!!

[kafkod]

You want Wilder to fight Whyte and get stripped.

Then you can say AJ doesn't have to fight him because he doesn't have a title.

Instead of clamoring for Joshua vs Wilder
You scary mofos are howling for Wilder vs Whyte

Have the WBC ordered Wilder to make his mandatory defence against Stiverne?

Because until they do that, he's free to fight whoever he wants, without getting stripped.

[kafkod]

it's the haters hiding behind rhetoric.

wilder has the top belt. the only thing worth chasing is the other belts. arum blocked parker from fighting him and joshua won't be available for a long time.

all wilder can do is keep the belt warm and wait. if ortiz gets the WBA belt, they can unify.

Seems like having a mando and wanting to unify is a great excuse for not fighting anybody with a pulse in Wilder's case.

When it comes to certain other fighters doe ...