Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Whyte: Deontay Wilder 'An Embarrassement to Heavyweight Boxing'
Collapse
-
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View PostOrtiz doesnt line up with Wilder ..hes already declined him once and made excuses about peds and such despite fighting guys or trying making fights who also were caught.Thers simply no way he would take less money and less attention fight with Joshua around the corner.
Really hoping whyte gets it now bc posters who write him off dont know what they are talking about or wilder fanboys bc they dont want to beleive that it will be his best opponet so far....which it would be.
Comment
-
Something just doesnt add up with wilder. He is content with fighting guys like molina, washington etc for around 1mil per fight. But he doesnt seem to want a career high payday against another easy fight like he claims. Makes no sense.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champion4ever View PostThen how long is Eddie Hearn is going to hide Anthony Joshua away from Deontay Wilder? After the Klitschko rematch, Hearn is discussing potential bouts with Tyson Fury, Kubrat Pulev, David Haye and Shannon Briggs. However, what about Wilder? No one ever mentions his name; Much less as a potential opponent for AJ?
Hearn talking about how Wilder v Whyte makes Wilder v Joshua bigger: http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-gre...-whyte--117867
So yeh, 2 mentions about Wilder fighting Joshua in the last month alone that had articles and topics on this very site (strange how those were missed?). Nobody says his name though...
That said, you obviously will not find anywhere near as many articles of Joshua (or his mouthpiece Hearn) calling out Wilder as you will Wilder calling out Joshua... mainly because Joshua isn't the type to run his mouth non-stop.
Originally posted by Raggamuffin View PostWilder doesn't have to audition for a fight with Joshua. Wlad doesn't want the fight in the UK. If Wlad doesn't do the rematch, they say that Joshua's mandatory is Pulev. Pulev??? Really? How did he become a mandatory? Oh he beat Maurice Harris, Chisora, Sam Peter and Kevin Johnson. So Joshua would rather fight Pulev instead of Wilder who owns a trinket as well. Joshua paid the trinket holder Martin 8 mil and paid Brazeale to come to the UK, but won't pay Wilder his biggest threat.
It's like you all want to totally ignore that Joshua has contractual obligations and thus a Wilder fight cannot happen right now. Feel free to bring up Hearn protecting Joshua from Wilder if there comes a time when Joshua has nothing in his way stopping him from making a Wilder fight but chooses not to... until then you're just being fanboys.
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostOk. Let's see. I say he should fight Ortiz next. If he doesn't, and he fights someone worse than Whyte, he should be crapped on.
Comment
-
Wilder was losing rounds against ex football player that had started fighting as a pro at age of 30. Wilder will continue fighting bums only, in Alabama, for nice pay days.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deus View PostHearn talking about how Joshua wants Wilder: http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-jos...ematch--117374
Hearn talking about how Wilder v Whyte makes Wilder v Joshua bigger: http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-gre...-whyte--117867
So yeh, 2 mentions about Wilder fighting Joshua in the last month alone that had articles and topics on this very site (strange how those were missed?). Nobody says his name though...
That said, you obviously will not find anywhere near as many articles of Joshua (or his mouthpiece Hearn) calling out Wilder as you will Wilder calling out Joshua... mainly because Joshua isn't the type to run his mouth non-stop.
Joshua has no choice, that is generally what mandatory means. And no, unification does not trump mandatory when the governing body involved have clearly outlined that no unifications can happen prior to the Pulev fight. Let's not let facts get in the way of your rhetoric though eh?
It's like you all want to totally ignore that Joshua has contractual obligations and thus a Wilder fight cannot happen right now. Feel free to bring up Hearn protecting Joshua from Wilder if there comes a time when Joshua has nothing in his way stopping him from making a Wilder fight but chooses not to... until then you're just being fanboys.
Ortiz is a Haymon fighter these days, no way does Haymon throw Wilder in with him whilst Ortiz is also the WBA mandatory to Joshua. He would literally be throwing money away to do that so I can't say it's unreasonable if Wilder doesn't fight Ortiz. Even if as a boxing fan it's a fight i'd like to see.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View PostWell, he is higher ranked contender by WBC than Duhaupas, Szpilka, Washington...where, before Wilder fought them..
But to me Whyte is a no name and u till proven otherwise is in the same ilk as the names you mentioned
It's a C level matchup made interesting because Whyte is a clown and probably make the prefighr antics interesting
For me if it isn't Joshua, Parker , Fury , Klit , Povetkin then it's whatever
I'd even be more interested in ,Pulev or Hughie
Comment
-
Originally posted by R_Walken View PostYeah and if he doesn't have to fight Stiverne then cool set up the fight. But this talk of Dentay scared of this scrub is laughable because people are just parroting HEARN and its a easy narrative
But to me Whyte is a no name and u till proven otherwise is in the same ilk as the names you mentioned
It's a C level matchup made interesting because Whyte is a clown and probably make the prefighr antics interesting
For me if it isn't Joshua, Parker , Fury , Klit , Povetkin then it's whatever
I'd even be more interested in ,Pulev or Hughie
Comment
-
Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View PostPulev ok, but Hughie, why?
And I'm a fan of Hughie and Wilder so Id be interested in how it played out.
Comment
Comment