yup, ray robinson was undefeated at welter and then went on to win the middle weight title a rediculous amount of times even as an old guy.
Best Welterweight Ever?
Collapse
-
say playa whats the name of the dvd??Originally posted by blockheadmy buddy got me a six dvd set of robinson fights for christmas last year. the guy was ****ing amazing. he had speed and movement like ali, but combined with one punch ko power.
on the dvd's there are two fights agains gene fulmer and in one of them ray drops a huge bomb right hand that sends genes mouthpeice into the seats and knocks him unconcious immediately, it is one of the most vicious ko's i have ever seenComment
-
yesOriginally posted by Rosewood_htowna few bout on espn classics..thats it not too many hell not even 1/4 of his fights...most on this thread can say the same thing...
I dont understand how you can pick tito ove robinson, if you have seen robinson fightComment
-
it doesnt have a name, it is a bootleg collection that my friend found for me on ebay. i wish i could find another copy.Originally posted by Rosewood_htownsay playa whats the name of the dvd??
you should really try to find some of the other robinson fights that are out there like the fulmer fights and the randy turpin fights. robinson loses to turpin but turpin has the weirdest style i have ever seenComment
-
Robinson never lost at WW he didn't lose a fight till he went up to fighting middleweights......but even then he himself was weigthing in below or at WW...against guys 10-13 pounds heavier. My brother also has DVD's on Robinson, Benitez, Archie Moore and some other great old timers. One thing that is apparent in watching Robinson was that he was relentless if he hurt you. I mean the second you got up he was literally on top of you, but even then he was smart and used all types of angles.Originally posted by Kid CanadaIf i`m not mistaken almost all of Robinsons losses(at least a dozen) were after his 40th birthday(he fought till he was 44) He was fighting guys 20 years younger than him on short notice because he blew all his money. And, he only ever lost once as a welterweight. That was to Lamotta, who he then beat the next 5 times they fought.Comment
-
You make a good point; but I feel Armstrong would have smothered Tito's power. Still, coming in on Tito is dangerous.Originally posted by wmutegreat post:
power and aggression delude a lot of people into making a fighter better than he is.
tito and oscar both ****** in their fight
I dont know if basilio could do tito, the fact that he dealt with robinson left hook is in his favor as well as his being lineal 160 champ, but I think he was too much of forward fighter (even with his skills, i dont think he had the right style to fight tito)
Ross and Armstrong are smaller than tito, that's my big concern. I know it is hard to pick anyone against armstrong, but again his style is not a great style to fight tito.
My reasoning with Basilio is exactly as you stated. Any man who can take the kind of licks Robinson was putting on him for 15 rounds (rematch) has a better than average chin.Comment
-
K-Dogg, You have some good views, but Felix never dodged a fight and he was public about wanting a Hopkins re-match. Tito was always known as taking on the best fighters, I think it never happened because of shady boxing politics.Comment
-
That I can agree with, though I would say his father might have had something to do with it. Tito was a true warrior, I have never said otherwise; I was merely making the point that if anyone had motivation for those fights not happening, it was Tito, not the men who dominated him.Originally posted by Rane-Ex54K-Dogg, You have some good views, but Felix never dodged a fight and he was public about wanting a Hopkins re-match. Tito was always known as taking on the best fighters, I think it never happened because of shady boxing politics.
No, I don't think Tito was afraid of anyone; but I can see his father protecting him....or, it might be as you say.Comment
Comment