Best Welterweight Ever?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dino
    BOXINGSCENE king
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 4319
    • 401
    • 12
    • 11,146

    #111
    Originally posted by Rane-Ex54
    Whats up everyone. I'm new to the boards, wondering who you guys thought the best Welterweight Was Ever?

    My pick is Felix "Tito" Trinidad. I don't think he gets the respect he deserves, shadowed by the gleam of Leonard & Del La Hoya.
    de la hoya beat trinidad...but my choice is thomas hearns

    Comment

    • ROSEWOOD
      THE SOUTH STILL HOLDIN
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2006
      • 4683
      • 209
      • 195
      • 12,093

      #112
      Originally posted by dino
      de la hoya beat trinidad...but my choice is thomas hearns
      nope wrong answer...Tito won...and Thomas Hearns was a great fighter but was nowhere near the top of the food chain.....suger ate his ass up...

      Comment

      • cple
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 920
        • 40
        • 0
        • 7,160

        #113
        Originally posted by Gunstar1
        You must be kidding me. The man dominated the division for years without losing. One of the hardest punchers in the history of that division, only Hearns is ahead of him, when it comes to power.
        No, i am not kidding you. Sure, he had the dominance, longevity, and accomplishments at welterweight, but he lacks in the level of opposition department--the most important factor in my opinion. Awesome puncher, great welterweight, but not top 10.

        Comment

        • machotime
          Caballo
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2005
          • 3109
          • 136
          • 65
          • 10,001

          #114
          Originally posted by Gunstar1
          Tito is way underrated, if he was Mexican, he would've been overrated like Chavez.
          I think people remember Tito in the wrong way, his loss to B-hop, His loss to Winky and his "win" against DLH.

          People don't remember the Boxer-puncher that dominated every opponent that stepped into the ring with him.

          In the latter part of his career, he became KO happy and he lost his ability to box and jab the way he used to. When he fought Camacho, he outboxed and closed in a master boxer. Tito was versatile, quick and powerful at welterweight.

          The people that say Tito was overrated are probably recent boxing fans and should talk to Whitaker, Camacho, Campas, Vargas, Carr etc..etc.

          Tito never ever ducked anyone, hell he even offered DLH a rematch 6 times over a 2 year span, and DLH never accepted. I wonder why?

          Comment

          • machotime
            Caballo
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2005
            • 3109
            • 136
            • 65
            • 10,001

            #115
            Originally posted by dino
            de la hoya beat trinidad...but my choice is thomas hearns
            Thomas Hearns' record is lackluster at 147, who did he beat?

            Tito beat Carr, Campas, Camacho, Blocker, Whitaker, Pineda, DLH

            He beat all of the above at 147.

            Comment

            • ROSEWOOD
              THE SOUTH STILL HOLDIN
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 4683
              • 209
              • 195
              • 12,093

              #116
              Originally posted by machotime
              I think people remember Tito in the wrong way, his loss to B-hop, His loss to Winky and his "win" against DLH.

              People don't remember the Boxer-puncher that dominated every opponent that stepped into the ring with him.

              In the latter part of his career, he became KO happy and he lost his ability to box and jab the way he used to. When he fought Camacho, he outboxed and closed in a master boxer. Tito was versatile, quick and powerful at welterweight.

              The people that say Tito was overrated are probably recent boxing fans and should talk to Whitaker, Camacho, Campas, Vargas, Carr etc..etc.

              Tito never ever ducked anyone, hell he even offered DLH a rematch 6 times over a 2 year span, and DLH never accepted. I wonder why?
              Great point playa...great point..

              Comment

              • K-DOGG
                Mitakuye Oyasin
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2006
                • 5851
                • 406
                • 396
                • 25,885

                #117
                Originally posted by cple
                No, i am not kidding you. Sure, he had the dominance, longevity, and accomplishments at welterweight, but he lacks in the level of opposition department--the most important factor in my opinion. Awesome puncher, great welterweight, but not top 10.
                The man speaks truth. For a fighter to rise to that next level, he needs a great performance against a great opponent.

                Ali had Frazier
                Robinson had Gavilin, Lamotta, Turpin, Fulmer, Basilio,....and Father Time
                Leonard had Hearns, Duran, Hagler, and Benitez
                Louis had Schmeling, Conn, Walcott, and WWII
                Saddler had Pepp
                Zale had Graziano
                Sanchez had Gomez and Nelson

                Being a great fighter is one thing; but to be an all time great, to step into Val Halla, a fighter must either have a great opponent to showcase his skills against or dominate so thoroghly and without question that his admittance can't be denied. And...the second path is much more difficult than the first.

                Tito had Carr, Campas, Camacho, De La Hoya, Vargas, Hopkins, & Wright. Carr & Campas, were top ten fighters; but they weren't the best. Camacho was long past his best and had already been brutalized by Chavez. De La Hoya and Quartey were Tito's anchormen at welterweight. They were the triad. De La Hoya and Quartey fought a pitched battle that showed the best in both men and ultimately pushed De La Hoya higher. Trinidad-De La Hoya was supposed to do that; but ended up having the opposite effect. Trinidad came out looking limited and De La Hoya came out looking more like a media creation wanting to play it safe than a died in the wool fighter.

                That fight hurt both men; and both will pay the consequenses of that blown-up show-down historically, IMO.

                When your moment comes to shine, you gotta take it, cause you may never get another chance. The gates to Val Halla are guarded by the gods of boxing and only the worthy will enter.
                Last edited by K-DOGG; 05-16-2006, 03:35 PM.

                Comment

                • boxer2k5
                  im a sociable person
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2004
                  • 4529
                  • 173
                  • 6
                  • 11,192

                  #118
                  sugar ray roberson easy
                  i mean 90+ wins

                  Comment

                  • Left2body
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 6200
                    • 269
                    • 277
                    • 13,212

                    #119
                    Originally posted by K-DOGG
                    The man speaks truth. For a fighter to rise to that next level, he needs a great performance against a great opponent.

                    Ali had Frazier
                    Robinson had Gavilin, Lamotta, Turpin, Fulmer, Basilio,....and Father Time
                    Leonard had Hearns, Duran, Hagler, and Benitez
                    Louis had Schmeling, Conn, Walcott, and WWII
                    Saddler had Pepp
                    Zale had Graziano
                    Sanchez had Gomez and Nelson

                    Being a great fighter is one thing; but to be an all time great, to step into Val Halla, a fighter must either have a great opponent to showcase his skills against or dominate so thoroghly and without question that his admittance can't be denied. And...the second path is much more difficult than the first.

                    Tito had Carr, Campas, Camacho, De La Hoya, Vargas, Hopkins, & Wright. Carr & Campas, were top ten fighters; but they weren't the best. Camacho was long past his best and had already been brutalized by Chavez. De La Hoya and Quartey were Tito's anchormen at welterweight. They were the triad. De La Hoya and Quartey fought a pitched battle that showed the best in both men and ultimately pushed De La Hoya higher. Trinidad-De La Hoya was supposed to do that; but ended up having the opposite effect. Trinidad came out looking limited and De La Hoya came out looking more like a media creation wanting to play it safe than a died in the wool fighter.

                    That fight hurt both men; and both will pay the consequenses of that blown-up show-down historically, IMO.

                    When your moment comes to shine, you gotta take it, cause you may never get another chance. The gates to Val Halla are guarded by the gods of boxing and only the worthy will enter.
                    Hell of a post damn right poetic......seriously, your closing comment sounded like a sober Larry Merchant. I'll give you some K-when it lets me give some again.

                    Comment

                    • ROSEWOOD
                      THE SOUTH STILL HOLDIN
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 4683
                      • 209
                      • 195
                      • 12,093

                      #120
                      Originally posted by boxer2k5
                      sugar ray roberson easy
                      i mean 90+ wins
                      the question everyone on this thread is asking is have you seen any footage of sugar ray rob??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP