Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

[Rath]

keep the spanking coming genius floyd fans

[Rath]

Yes it was. Now get on with your "life" or what's left of it.

good answer now leave my thread and make your own genius threads

[MDPopescu]

Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

The TUE was granted 21 days later after the fight .

Which means at the time of the fight, the IV infusion was illegal because the TUE was not even applied for.

The granted TUE was for the IV infusion at the time of the fight not after it because the TUE no longer serves its purpose since the fight was done and over with.

Floyd fans don't clearly say it was not illegal, but (instead) they say Floyd should be entitled to get away with anything... because that's what he used to do...

[kafkod]

Floyd fans don't clearly say it was not illegal, but (instead) they say Floyd should be entitled to get away with anything... because that's what he used to do...

Floyd is the "A side" over everybody, so he can't do anything illegal.

[Lester Tutor]

Floyd is the "A side" over everybody, so he can't do anything illegal.

And apparently the whole boxing industry including networks and writers just give up with insufficient evidence because Floyd is magically above the law or makes boxing as a whole a garbage sport because he controls everything?

this is what HBO has to surrender to correct? sure! as if no other sports or athletes have ever been challenged or accused of cheating. might as well say Lionel Messi or Ronaldo can't do anything illegal because they are the A sides in bringing revenue to football.

Do realize the FBI did a smackdown on FIFA recently on its CEOs. You're telling me Floyd has accumulated more than FIFA or no feds dare to take on Floyd or boxing? cmon man lol

[Robbie Barrett]

There aren't retroactive TUEs under the WADA code.

Floyd is welcome to rehydrate he just can't use a banned method.

Oh really?



1.1.3. Retroactive TUEs

There are situations for which TUEs may be granted retroactively.
Nevertheless, even if a potential retroactive TUE case is examined, under
no circumstances does this provide any guarantee that the TUE will be
granted. The evaluation procedure is the same as that for the standard
TUE application. The application will be studied by the relevant TUEC,
which will issue its decision.
In accordance with Article 4.3 of the International Standard for TUEs, the
following two situations may result in a retroactive TUE:
© WADA World Anti-Doping Programme Version 6.0
TUE Guidelines January 2012
- 14 -
1. Emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical
condition.
2. If, due to exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time
or opportunity for an applicant to submit, or a TUEC to consider, an
application prior to doping control.


https://wada-main-prod.s3.amazonaws....es_V6.0_EN.pdf

[HanzGruber]

why are you still crying is what i wanna know, its really not healthy

[Robbie Barrett]

Dehydration is not a chronic illness and rules have changed since 2012

Show us these changed rules or did you just change them to suit your agenda? Shut your dumb ass up and stop embarrassing yourself.

[Robbie Barrett]

NSAC said what Floyd and USADA did was unacceptable!

No, NSAC said Mayweather did nothing wrong, their problem was with USADA not Mayweather.

[Rath]

No, NSAC said Mayweather did nothing wrong, their problem was with USADA not Mayweather.

look at how your logic works

NSAC problem was with USADA when it was floyd who administered IV without TUE for 21 days.

and that is what NSAC calls "unacceptable."

when NSAC realizes the magnitude of their statement which will result to confusion and how they will resolve those billions of dollars of bet that already changed hand, they suddenly retracted what they said a week ago and made another statement saying "Floyd did nothing wrong"

now the question is what is unacceptable with floyd's doing nothing wrong?