Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?

[Rath]

Floyd fans don't clearly say it was not illegal, but (instead) they say Floyd should be entitled to get away with anything... because that's what he used to do...

true, very true

[Rath]

And apparently the whole boxing industry including networks and writers just give up with insufficient evidence because Floyd is magically above the law or makes boxing as a whole a garbage sport because he controls everything?

this is what HBO has to surrender to correct? sure! as if no other sports or athletes have ever been challenged or accused of cheating. might as well say Lionel Messi or Ronaldo can't do anything illegal because they are the A sides in bringing revenue to football.

Do realize the FBI did a smackdown on FIFA recently on its CEOs. You're telling me Floyd has accumulated more than FIFA or no feds dare to take on Floyd or boxing? cmon man lol

how long did it took FBI to do just that?

[original zero]

Retroactive TUE was specifically allowed under the terms of Manny & Floyd's voluntary agreement. You've created a controversy in your head that does not exist in reality.

IV was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason. However, Manny & Floyd VOLUNTARY AGREED that even though it was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason, that they would notify an independent third party of said use, explain why the use occurred and that independent third party would determine if the use was legitimate.

Everything was done by the book and the use was determined to be legitimate.

The reason the exemption application was received a couple weeks after the fight is because when a half billion dollar promotion is involved, things are a little more complicated than your doctor writing a note for your boss on his note pad. Everything has to be documented by the medical professionals, your attorneys are obviously going to make sure they are comfortable with the way the request is written, etc. That kind of stuff takes time.

However much time was allowable under the terms of the contract is something Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to. Whether that was 30 days or anything else. That is their private business.

You continue to post false information day after day. What the NSAC called unacceptable was USADA not notifying them of the exemption. USADA's position was that it wasn't necessary to notify NSAC for an exemption of something that was already 100% legal in Nevada with or without an exemption.

NSAC, probably to save face and not look weak, demanded to be notified anyway even though logically it didn't really make sense. But that is what they called unacceptable, not being notified by USADA. That has nothing to do with Floyd or anything Floyd did. His actions were 100% kosher under the NSAC rules.

So I have clearly and plainly answered your question with easily verifiable facts. I assume that means we can close the thread now?

[Rath]

Retroactive TUE was specifically allowed under the terms of Manny & Floyd's voluntary agreement. You've created a controversy in your head that does not exist in reality.

IV was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason. However, Manny & Floyd VOLUNTARY AGREED that even though it was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason, that they would notify an independent third party of said use, explain why the use occurred and that independent third party would determine if the use was legitimate.

Everything was done by the book and the use was determined to be legitimate.

The reason the exemption application was received a couple weeks after the fight is because when a half billion dollar promotion is involved, things are a little more complicated than your doctor writing a note for your boss on his note pad. Everything has to be documented by the medical professionals, your attorneys are obviously going to make sure they are comfortable with the way the request is written, etc. That kind of stuff takes time.

However much time was allowable under the terms of the contract is something Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to. Whether that was 30 days or anything else. That is their private business.

You continue to post false information day after day. What the NSAC called unacceptable was USADA not notifying them of the exemption. USADA's position was that it wasn't necessary to notify NSAC for an exemption of something that was already 100% legal in Nevada with or without an exemption.

NSAC, probably to save face and not look weak, demanded to be notified anyway even though logically it didn't really make sense. But that is what they called unacceptable, not being notified by USADA. That has nothing to do with Floyd or anything Floyd did. His actions were 100% kosher under the NSAC rules.

So I have clearly and plainly answered your question with easily verifiable facts. I assume that means we can close the thread now?

there you go again, i think you already posted this or another genius floyd fan.

what did i just told you.

Established first if floyd was dehydrated then post this stuff about TUE.

i proved to you that Floyd was not dehydrated.

now prove me wrong.

[Reloaded]

Retroactive TUE was specifically allowed under the terms of Manny & Floyd's voluntary agreement. You've created a controversy in your head that does not exist in reality.

IV was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason. However, Manny & Floyd VOLUNTARY AGREED that even though it was 100% legal in Nevada, in any amount, for any reason, that they would notify an independent third party of said use, explain why the use occurred and that independent third party would determine if the use was legitimate.

Everything was done by the book and the use was determined to be legitimate.

The reason the exemption application was received a couple weeks after the fight is because when a half billion dollar promotion is involved, things are a little more complicated than your doctor writing a note for your boss on his note pad. Everything has to be documented by the medical professionals, your attorneys are obviously going to make sure they are comfortable with the way the request is written, etc. That kind of stuff takes time.

However much time was allowable under the terms of the contract is something Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed to. Whether that was 30 days or anything else. That is their private business.

You continue to post false information day after day. What the NSAC called unacceptable was USADA not notifying them of the exemption. USADA's position was that it wasn't necessary to notify NSAC for an exemption of something that was already 100% legal in Nevada with or without an exemption.

NSAC, probably to save face and not look weak, demanded to be notified anyway even though logically it didn't really make sense. But that is what they called unacceptable, not being notified by USADA. That has nothing to do with Floyd or anything Floyd did. His actions were 100% kosher under the NSAC rules.

So I have clearly and plainly answered your question with easily verifiable facts. I assume that means we can close the thread now?

Your post should be made a sticky here , but for some reason the board doesnt mind what it is be reduced too on a daily basis by a few losers crying a river , there is no truth or morals nothing , just little kids crying .

[Rath]

Your post should be made a sticky here , but for some reason the board doesnt mind what it is be reduced too on a daily basis by a few losers crying a river , there is no truth or morals nothing , just little kids crying .

i thought you quit?

[doom_specialist]

you hit me with a lot of garbage blah blah blahs and i prove that they were garbage.

and you end up with NSAC said this and that.

according to genius floyd fan NSAC is not credible, when Pac said let the commission do it's job

what say you?

The NSAC actually DID do their job and denied Manny Pacquiao Toradol for an injury that he didn't disclose on his questionnaire, and a lot of Pacquiao supporters claimed corruption, not the other way around.

One more time: NSAC rules are all that matter. Anything you say regarding USADA, WADA, or any other rules commission not named the Nevada State Athletic Commission means nothing, no matter how much you want it to be otherwise. Bob Bennett and all NSAC commissioners had no interest in Mayweather last May, and they don't now. If you don't like it, too bad. Have a nice day.

[Reloaded]

i thought you quit?

I just quit engaging you because your not a stand up guy and you bore me .

[doom_specialist]

NSAC said what Floyd and USADA did was unacceptable!

That's the final word. Bennett and all NSAC commissioners are not pursuing Mayweather, and feel he did nothing wrong. Can't rewrite history brody.

[Rath]

I just quit engaging you because your not a stand up guy and you bore me .

boo hoo hoo