keep the spanking going genius floyd fans LOL
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why do Floyd fans says the IV infusion was not illegal?
Collapse
-
Is it prohibited for athletes to use IV infusions for rehydration and recovery?
You are here:HomeAsk The Scientists
March 5, 2014Ask The Scientists
We have seen an increase in inquires at USADA about the use of Intravenous (IV) Infusions for this purpose, and would like to assist athletes and medical personnel by offering education. In accordance with the WADA Prohibited List (Category M2 Chemical and Physical Manipulation), all IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL (~3.4 tablespoons) per 6-hour period are prohibited, except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures or clinical investigations. IV infusions and/or injections of more than 50mL per 6-hour period are prohibited at all times, both in- and out-of-competition unless the athlete has applied for and been granted a The****utic Use Exemption (TUE) under the applicable anti-doping rules. Further, if a prohibited substance that is administered intravenously or via injection, a TUE is necessary for this substance regardless of volume.
Some reports suggest that administration of IV infusions, including dietary supplement and vitamin ****tails, are being provided to athletes for recuperation, recovery or lifestyle reasons. This medical practice is prohibited at all times without prior TUE approval. WADA has justified the inclusion of IV infusions on the Prohibited List given the intent of some athletes to manipulate their plasma volume levels in order to mask the use of a prohibited substance and/or to distort the values in the Athlete Biological Passport. Further, it must be clearly stated that the use of IV fluid replacement following exercise to correct mild rehydration or help speed recovery is not clinically indicated nor substantiated by the medical literature. There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice. Legitimate medical indications for IV infusions are well documented and are most commonly associated with medical emergencies (emergency TUE), in-patient care, surgery, or clinical investigations for diagnostic purposes.
Athletes should be aware that in specific cases, for example at an Olympic Games, there are specific no-needle policies requiring declarations of all injections/infusions, which aim to protect the health of athletes, encourage best medical practice, and discourage the use of techniques/manipulation that may be considered doping.
http://www.usada.org/is-it-prohibite...-and-recovery/Last edited by Furn; 02-15-2016, 11:18 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View PostHauser did not gave out facts?
Hauser the lawyer - emotional writing
Iole the floyd fan - objective reporting
genius floyd fan and his logic.
John Grisham - Lawyer
Kevin Iole - BWAA
Hauser = BWAA Auxiliary Member approver!
yeah it takes 2 months to redundantize the old PED Mess Articles by Montoya & Hauser if boxing can trust USADA just because Hauser's nail biting drama that Floyd is about to taint 49-0.
apparently the flux capacitor deleted time space coninuum after May 2nd until a week before Sept. 12th that nobody had a clue!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostArum - Lawyer
John Grisham - Lawyer
Kevin Iole - BWAA
Hauser = BWAA Auxiliary Member approver!
yeah it takes 2 months to redundantize the old PED Mess Articles by Montoya & Hauser if boxing can trust USADA just because Hauser's nail biting drama that Floyd is about to taint 49-0.
apparently the flux capacitor deleted time space coninuum after May 2nd until a week before Sept. 12th that nobody had a clue!
you have been exposed and owned
you are a genius floyd fan
you have a vested interest and therefore everything that you post was/is not credible.
but you can keep spinning. that's what genius floyd fans are known for.Last edited by Rath; 02-15-2016, 10:30 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View Postsad re those who says Floyd was dehydrated but can't prove it.
YOU are the one dis*****g the official account of events. You have to prove he wasn't dehydrated.
You can't.
Comment
-
Why is this thread still going?
The NSAC is was the governing body for the fight PERIOD. Stop bringing up sets of rules that do not matter. Mayweather was in full compliance with the NSAC, no matter how many times you mention USADA or WADA. That will never change. This is a troll thread.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View Postit took floyd 19 days to apply for TUE and another 3 days more for USADA to study it and retroactively approved when they already approved it may 1st.
you have been exposed and owned
you are a genius floyd fan
you have a vested interest and therefore everything that you post was/is not credible.
but you can keep spinning. that's what genius floyd fans are known for.
supposedly eagles can spot pennies a mile high...
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostThe onus is on you to prove he wasn't. USADA's officer witnessed Floyd's condition and witnessed the paramedic administer the IV. An exception was requested, as outlined in the contract, and granted.
YOU are the one dis*****g the official account of events. You have to prove he wasn't dehydrated.
You can't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View PostYou're incorrect. The IV use was 100% legal in Nevada.
An exemption was needed because Floyd & Manny VOLUNTARILY agreed that they would notify USADA about any IV use so that USADA could investigate and make a determination of whether the use was legitimate. Everything was done by the book and USADA determined the use was legitimate.
Floyd did NOT use a banned method. It was 100% legal in Nevada. Floyd & Manny simply voluntarily agreed to notify USADA of said use so USADA could determine if the use was legitimate.
USADA was notified of the IV before it was administered and USADA was present. It seems many of you are very very confused about the exemption. Floyd & Manny agreed that if either one of them used an IV, their medical team would have to submit a report documenting why the IV was administered and USADA would either accept or reject their explanation. That is why the exemption is retroactive. So the medical & legal team of the fighter has time to properly submit the exemption and USADA has time to properly investigate the exemption.
If a fighter is claiming to be dehydrated, you don't wait two weeks to treat him until lawyers & doctors have finished filing their reports and documents. You treat the fighter and then the facts are investigated so USADA can determine if the use was legitimate. If a fighter is dehydrated after a weigh in, what sense would it make to not allow him to be treated until after the bureaucracy (which can take weeks) is settled?
How was he dehydrated?
First time ever of him taking an IV?
Why not just drink water if he was not far from his walk around wait?
Why did he look OK in the weigh in with no symptoms of any abnormality?
Comment
-
Because it will taint his best win of all time. The shouldergate tainted it already and ped gate will push it over the edge.
Nobody wants that do they?
Comment
Comment