The thing that kills me is that the golovkin detractors try to appear objective. They can't stand the guy and will never give him credit even if he does the things they ask if him.
Nothing's wrong with it but don't act like you're objective. You guys pretend that you're objective fans but even good posters like you are beyond biased but pretend otherwise.
The thing that kills me is that the golovkin detractors try to appear objective. They can't stand the guy and will never give him credit even if he does the things they ask if him.
The fact is, Team Triple Duck has given the Bumlovkin detractors much with which to detract.
The thing that kills me is that the golovkin detractors try to appear objective. They can't stand the guy and will never give him credit even if he does the things they ask if him.
golovkin could barely speak english when that was the headline
also, hatton was 140 lb champion when manny fought him. he'd lost to floy,d but was still undefeated at the weight. manny dropped back to 140 from 147, where he wasn't coming close to the weight limit anyway.
best pacquiao i've ever seen. scary accurracy and power. scary. there was a part of me that genuinely questioned whether hatton was going to get up. i turned to a friend, who was inot MMA at the time, and told him, "this is boxing, man. he might not get up."
crazy, crazy speed and power. prime, juiced up manny was scary
Hatton wasn't the best fighter in the world by a long shot though. The closest Pac came to something like that was when he stepped up to fight Barrera at featherweight. Floyd is even further off the mark, with Castillo at 135 being the closest comparison you could draw. Don't think either of those are on a par with facing Ward in your first fight at 168.
Nothing's wrong with it but don't act like you're objective. You guys pretend that you're objective fans but even good posters like you are beyond biased but pretend otherwise.
this is pretty much what it comes down to.
BBB, larry, dun, etc, just need to admit that they have biases. that's all. admit that you don't see things clearly where your fighters are concerned.
if you think floyd walked canelo down, for instance, you're a fanboy. if you participated in the 6 year race war on NSB, which all of you did, [and we all remember it,] you're a fanboy.
you guys are fanboys. just don't act like you're not, and we're cool
Nothing's wrong with it but don't act like you're objective. You guys pretend that you're objective fans but even good posters like you are beyond biased but pretend otherwise.
The criticism GGG is getting is standard for NSB. Yet now that GGG is the subject, the criticisms are "biased" and "unfair". How is this possible? this would mean they were always biased and unfair on their face, but posters overlooked this depending on who the subject is.
I can't see how its unfair to hold him to what was said and question his motives when his actions contradict what is said.
The thing that kills me is that the golovkin detractors try to appear objective. They can't stand the guy and will never give him credit even if he does the things they ask if him.
This happens to every top fighter in the sport though. Floyd's resume constantly got picked apart even though he was fighting top welterweight contenders. When your that good, fans demand more.
Hatton wasn't the best fighter in the world by a long shot though. The closest Pac came to something like that was when he stepped up to fight Barrera at featherweight. Floyd is even further off the mark, with Castillo at 135 being the closest comparison you could draw. Don't think either of those are on a par with facing Ward in your first fight at 168.
he obviously wans't the best fighter in the world . my post never implied that. he did, however, go to 140 for the first time and fight the lineal champion of the division. he also looked downright frightening at 140.
Comment