Comments Thread For: Hagler: Marciano's 49-0 is Better Than Mayweather's 50-0

[IronDanHamza]

Do you understand the term pound for pound was created to rank everyone else aside from heavyweights? Why is that? FOH you wannabe intellectual phaggot.

Why do you think it is? Plus, heavyweights were considered "P4P" also, like Joe Louis for example.

It's your criteria you can rank guys how you want, flawed or not. But you'd be in a small minority if you rank only Heavyweights as the greatest on your ATG list, then Crusierweights, then Lightheavyweights. And it's pretty incredible of you to be calling others out for not thinking that same crazy line of thinking.

I mean, it's completely backward. Where would you stop ranking Heavyweights or would the whole Top 100 be Heavyweights? I can't imagine a Crusierweight or lower beating a prime Donovon Razor Ruddock for example. Maybe a handful of Crusierweights? Not sure. And there has to be atleast 40-50 heavyweights above Razor.

[SouthPawHitman]

Actually, Marciano went 49*-0.

* = the one "amateur" fight he lost while he was an active professional...

That was some myth that Rocky cleared up during that movie they made where who would win between Ali-Rocky.

It was a lot to do about nothing

[SouthPawHitman]

Are you betting money on the Mayweather Berto fight?

Yeah I'm betting 3 grand

[tangalog2200]

Because it's a mind numbingly dumb line of thinking.

So only heavyweights can be considered the greatest?

This is literally brand new to me.

well, ali is the goat...he is a hw...

[IronDanHamza]

well, ali is the goat...he is a hw...

Arguably. And he's the only HW you could argue.

What's your point I seem to have missed it.

[Larry the boss]

I am sorry Hagler is so wrong it's sad

Going thru 5 divisions beibg "lineal" in 4 while winning 12 world titles and remaining undefeated for 19 years is far more impressive then what Marciano did

[Kagami Taiga]

Do you understand the term pound for pound was created to rank everyone else aside from heavyweights? Why is that? FOH you wannabe intellectual phaggot.

Dude u are constantly just lost. Lol

[El-blanco]

Why do you think it is? Plus, heavyweights were considered "P4P" also, like Joe Louis for example.

It's your criteria you can rank guys how you want, flawed or not. But you'd be in a small minority if you rank Heavyweights as the greatest on your ATG list, then Crusierweights, then Lightheavyweights. And it's pretty incredible of you to be calling others out for not thinking that same crazy line of thinking.

I mean, it's completely backward. Where would you stop ranking Heavyweights or would the whole Top 100 be Heavyweights? I can't imagine a Crusierweight or lower beating a prime Donovon Razor Ruddock for example. Maybe a handful of Crusierweights? Not sure. And there has to be atleast 40-50 heavyweights above Razor.

Lol no he wasn't. P4p was created by journalists to distinguish sugar ray from joe Louis who was the king. Sure the smaller guys have more skill but to be the best shouldn't you be able to beat the other guy? The whole conversation you're having is abstract and would be laughed at by anyone outside of boxing. The whole point of it was/is to generate newspaper sales,web hits, conversation, etc. think in terms of reality and this isn't a question. I'm done with this, you guys are legit ******ed.

[Larry the boss]

well, ali is the goat...he is a hw...

Ali would not even agree with you on that,he said he was the greatest heavyweight ever and Ray Robinson was the best ever

[El-blanco]

Dude u are constantly just lost. Lol

Go read about the history, I'll recommend some books if you like, until then **** off.