Everything cotto said is tru! yet all these bum MF still hate. Can some of you boxer fans point out a lie in what cotto said? Boxing scene posters are a ****in joke! Lolololololol
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Cotto: GGG Never Beat Top Foe, Canelo Failed To Shine!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostSo his resume is made of mostly of those three fights?
Here I had previously posted on another thread my breakdown of Cotto's resume and notable fights:
Cotto is so popular not because of his wins, but because he is a Rican and unlike GGG he got opportunity to fight the best. If you look at his resume objectivily, its becomes crystal clear that he never beat a top fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostHe's defending against geale because its a voluntary. Do I like it, no. Is it understandable, yes.
And why should Cotto stay quiet when the press are the ones who ask him the same questions over and over again?
Similar feelings right here, but I hope that he doesn't take a year off like the last time he fought
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Johannes- View PostHe's a hypocrite because he questions GGG's opponents while he's scheduled to fight one of those opponents he just pretty much criticized.
That whole "he payed his dues" is pretty ****ing pathetic. People still give Pacquiao/Floyd **** if they fight some no good /hasbeen and they've payed their dues. Queen Cotto should get a pass though, gtfo with that BS.
Do you seriously not see it?
Again, he basically saying "who are these new fighters to tell me what to do with my career". "Who have they fought"
That mind frame is what Cotto probably has.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View PostHe fought martinez instead of taking that 10 mil. Thats right he signed a roc nation contract and is gonna be getting 16 mil a fight. Way more than 10 mi. Besides, when he fought rodriguez, wasn't it stated here in nsb that the fight was "accepted only if he fought martinez aftwards"? Something along those lines. And if so, how could Canelo, a showtime specific fighter get a fight with Cotto when cotto had "obligations" after his rodriguez fight?
Originally posted by PETUFF View PostCanelo lost to lara and trout!
Comment
-
Originally posted by From Russia View PostSo, Cotto lost to top fighters in their prime(nothing to be ashamed of). He had close fights with good fighters (Mosley, Clottey), his best win is injured Martinez, who looked bad in his last fights its undeniable... And dont bring Torres, Judah and Mallignaggi etc, they have names, but they never beat anybody...
Cotto is so popular not because of his wins, but because he is a Rican and unlike GGG he got opportunity to fight the best. If you look at his resume objectivily, its becomes crystal clear that he never beat a top fighter.
Break down his resume would ya? Or you can't?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostAnd Cotto has "obligations" right now called a MANDATORY DEFENSE. But he refuses to honor that obligation. So Cotto is no longer the honorable man he once was, I guess. And this can not be argued as he is proving it to be true by his own actions.
And Cotto lost to Trout and as he has not fought Lara, we have no idea what would have happened there. So you look like a fool pointing out irrelevant facts.
No... you are the fool who can't see past GGG nutsacks.
Comment
-
How do you say GGG never beat a tough foe??? yet you are fighting someone he battered last year? who has Geale ever beaten??
How do you say Canelo failed to shine when you lost to Floyd to?
WTF is wrong with Cotto?
Comment
Comment