Who has Mayweather fought that was better than Carl Froch?

[Loque-san]

I don't recall saying Bute and Groves had amazing win lists, but neither does Lara. Degale, Bika, Miranda, etc are not that much different from Angulo, Trout, etc.

If you extrapolate Lara's record based on close decisions it sways in his favor but that would need it's own thread or 20...

I'm not counting Molina, Vanes or Canelo. Williams, Trout, Angulo, Smith is enough. Bute beat some decent fighters but not the top guys at 168. Groves' resume was (and still is) very thin.

[-PBP-]

I'd say Corrales, Castillo and Cotto for sure. Some can be argued but I don't think the arguments will be very strong.

[joseph5620]

LOL Ok

Laughing about Corrales is ignorant. Froch has never been that type of dominating unbeaten champion.

[joseph5620]

The Carl froch ward fought is better than the versions of top names mayweather fought.

No he wasn't and he certainly didn't show it.

[Mr.Fantastic]

In terms of resume, not many(at the time Floyd fought them) but in terms of skillwise there are several.

[tjones1989]

Josie Harris and that lady from jamaica

[joseph5620]

Corrales was not a universal favourite, the odds were damn tight.

And anyway, Corrales was just a fun fighter but nothing more, Froch is currently one of the best on the planet, has been for years and has one of the best resumes of the past decade, Corrales doesn't hold those distinctions. Its as simple as that.

When you say " Corrales was just a fun fighter" that let's me know you don't know much about him.

[SkillspayBills]

Margarito, Tszu, Martinez, Pacquiao, Golovkin.

No wait........

You think Margarito is better than Carl Froch? Seriously??

[emre belozoglu]

no he has not

[-PBP-]

Hatton, Judah, Maidana, Alvarez.

No, No, No and No