Al Haymon trying to get Cotto-Mayweather 2

[Ham Porter]

If I wanted to give you a laugh - I'd hand you a mirror.

As much as it might put your panties in a bunch, Golovtard, Cotto is the one and ONLY legitimate champion @ 160. And Yes, I can see Cotto beating the Triple Duck...

Cotto would not even contemplate the idea of fighting Golovkin, which makes your prediction and the insult towards Golovkin all the more ****** and hilarious.

@ "legitimate champion"

[kombayn]

I'll pay to watch Mayweather vs. Cotto II, it'll be a little bogus if it's at 155lbs and for the WBC Middleweight Championship but I'd still watch it. Cotto has to listen, and it just gives him further leverage against Canelo in their negotiations and I'm sure Mayweather knows that as well.

Even if it's Mayweather vs. Khan, it'll still happen on Cinco de Mayo. They just put Leo Santa Cruz vs. Abner Mares as the co-feature and it should sell.

[bluebeam]

your whole argument is false..it's based on your own distorted view of boxing being a floyd vs pac fight.. let me clarify something for you...floyd has lineal titles in 4 weight classes and 5 wbc titles ( most in history).

floyd had a legacy before pac came on the scene in 2008. floyd's legacy is to retire undefeated winning 6 titles (5 lineal) in 6 weight classes the first fighter to win titles from 130-160 undefeated against legit champions at the weight. that carries far more wight than a pac fight since pac has no legacy at 147-154 or 160.

pac is not competing against the best right now cotto is so floyd should jump on this chance to solidify his legacy with a fight against cotto who is also a legit 4 weight world champion himself.

the pac hype train is over..pac is fighting rios, algeri, and vargas he is finished as a fighter at the weight classes floyd competes at.

beating a fighter at middleweight that isn't a middleweight means nothing too Floyd's legacy. not one person in boxing prefers mayweather vs cotto over mayweather vs pacquaio except you. for the last 5 years all anybody talks about is Floyd vs manny. nobody talks about Floyd vs cotto 2. you rather see Floyd fight a guy he already beat instead of a guy that everybody thinks he is scared of. that logic makes no sense at all

and for the record Floyd's first titles at 140 and 147 weren't against legit champions. gatti and baldomir. just because baldomir was lineal champ means nothing. he was a nobody before Floyd beat him and he was a nobody after Floyd beat him.

I seen Floyd fight live at the Olympics in 1996. I know everything there is too know about his career and I know beating a man he already beat means nothing at this point in his career.

and you talking about resume. pacquiao resume is way better than cotto's.

after every fight the question remains the same. is pacquiao next? not once have you heard jim gray or any other media member ask him about Miguel cotto. the reason is because nobody cares about a Floyd vs cotto rematch

bottom line pacquiao is greater than cotto. everybody saw it with there own eyes on November 14 2009

[bluebeam]

Because nobody knows who GGG is yet, it's just that simple. I can't believe people are comparing a guy who draws 300k without Floyd and a guy who's never been on PPV to the drawing power of Cotto vs Floyd. Most mexicans are also smart boxing fans and they even realize that Cotto has a better shot against Floyd than Canelo does against GGG.

cotto has a better chance of beating canelo than he does beating Floyd.

and cotto has never cracked a million ppv without Floyd or pacquiao as the A side.

cotto is a great draw at the gate. he isn't that big of a draw on ppv. cotto did the same 300k with Martinez a fighter that has been on ppv before, that canelo did with lara a guy who has never been on ppv.

[bluebeam]

I seem to recall that happening before. Not long ago. Martinez was fighting Chavez and Canelo I think was fighting someone. Not sure if both were pay per view but they were two major cards in same night. But I should look It up. My me memory is foggy. Anyone recall details??

I for one think that egos of some may overcome common sense and they at be foolish enough to compete on the same night.

yes your memory is very foggy brother. canelo's fight was on regular showtime and chavez jr's fight was on ppv. 2 boxing ppv's in the same night has never been done and it wont ever be done.

the cable company has the final say as too which fight it would distribute on ppv

[Morgano]

I can see cherry picker Cotto taking the money en losing a Boring UD
Mayweather will have his MW title too ...

I am 100%positive it will happen,sad for boxing

[TMTForever]

beating a fighter at middleweight that isn't a middleweight means nothing too Floyd's legacy.

floyd started at 130, beating cotto for the legit lineal WBC title at 160 means everything to his legacy. once again and do try and read this..if floyd defeated cotto at 160 for the middleweight title that would make him lineal in 5 weight classes with 6 wbc titles. that is what i call a legacy. no fighter in the modern era of boxing has done it before.

not one person in boxing prefers mayweather vs cotto over mayweather vs pacquaio except you.

lol go back and read the responses in this post..plenty of people want to see cotto vs floyd 2. let me put it to you like this. Floyd vs cotto 2 will do more ppv buys then pac vs algeri or vargas lmao.

for the last 5 years all anybody talks about is Floyd vs manny.

wrong again that's all you and people like you talk about, I Haven't talked about it since 2009 when pac refused drug testing. i knew he was scared to face floyd who is ten times the fighter marquez and morales are and they handled pac easily.

nobody talks about Floyd vs cotto 2. you rather see Floyd fight a guy he already beat instead of a guy that everybody thinks he is scared of. that logic makes no sense at all.

nobody talks about floyd vs cotto 2 that's why it's over 30 pages long. got it. the only people that think floyd is scared of pacquiao is once again people like you. those of us who follow boxing know that pac refused drug testing and a 50/50 split in 2009, that told me all i need to know about pacquiao.

and for the record Floyd's first titles at 140 and 147 weren't against legit champions. gatti and baldomir. just because baldomir was lineal champ means nothing. he was a nobody before Floyd beat him and he was a nobody after Floyd beat him.

so a Hofer like gatti who was the WBC 140 champ for two years with 5 succesful title defenses wasn't legit, and baldomir who defeated judah who was the unified champ at 147 wasn't legit either. do you have syphilis?

I seen Floyd fight live at the Olympics in 1996. I know everything there is too know about his career and I know beating a man he already beat means nothing at this point in his career.

floyd has a legacy outside of pacquiao not sure why that's so hard for you to comprehend. syphilis of the brain seem to be the diagnosis.

and you talking about resume. pacquiao resume is way better than cotto's.

lol way better I don't think so.. cotto beat mosley when he still had something left and he's never been knocked out cold.

after every fight the question remains the same. is pacquiao next? not once have you heard jim gray or any other media member ask him about Miguel cotto. the reason is because nobody cares about a Floyd vs cotto rematch

the question is one you need to have a semblance of life. I have moved on from pacquiao and his fear of needles you need to do the same.

bottom line pacquiao is greater than cotto. everybody saw it with there own eyes on November 14 2009

At this point in their careers cotto is greater he is the recognized middleweight champion of the world and has mega fights with floyd and canelo lined up..pac is fighting algeri and vargas next and moving back to a jr. division lmao.

[bojangles1987]

As if I don't already hate boxing too damn much sometimes, Mayweather winning a bogus MW title might make me stop watching for a few months. Sad thing is, I knew this was a strong possibility the moment Cotto/Martinez was made.

[IMDAZED]

As if I don't already hate boxing too damn much sometimes, Mayweather winning a bogus MW title might make me stop watching for a few months. Sad thing is, I knew this was a strong possibility the moment Cotto/Martinez was made.

If Pacquiao-Margarito didn't make you stop watching boxing for a period time (and that was 100x worse), I doubt this will, my friend.

[The Big Dunn]

As if I don't already hate boxing too damn much sometimes, Mayweather winning a bogus MW title might make me stop watching for a few months. Sad thing is, I knew this was a strong possibility the moment Cotto/Martinez was made.

come on, Bo. no other potential bogus title win made you stop watching the sport, has it?