Nah .he didnt really challenge himself in his career
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think it's safe to say, Mayweather has probably the best defence in boxing history
Collapse
-
Definitely one of the best. Probably THE best in the video era (1950s and later.) The only competition I can imagine would be some of the guys in the first couple decades of the 20th C.
Offense is another story, obviously, but it's more than sufficient in today's world, where hurting the opponent isn't necessary to win the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Beamish View PostDefinitely one of the best. Probably THE best in the video era (1950s and later.) The only competition I can imagine would be some of the guys in the first couple decades of the 20th C.
Offense is another story, obviously, but it's more than sufficient in today's world, where hurting the opponent isn't necessary to win the fight.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View PostI think he is a great defender, but gets overrated in terms of historic ranking..
Anytime floyd fought a true top caliber guy, he got tagged...
Zab
Oscar
Cotto
Castillo
Maidana
All seemed to hit him pretty easily
He is an all time great defender but i wouldn't say he is the goat defender..
I highly doubt floyd could come in fat and 40 pounds past his prime fighting weight and be able to compete with froch, ggg, ward, kovolev, unlike james toney who's incredible defense allowed him much success even when fat and way up in weight..
You can't possibly tell me that floyd is a better defender than prime roy jones who beat two ATG fighters in their prime and didn't get touched..
Roy Jones got hit a lot by Montel Griffin.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostThen on the flipside Toney got hit way more than Floyd has ever been hit by Dave Tiberi and Merqui Sosa alone. Toney didn't need to fight top level guys to "get tagged" he "got tagged" by fighters who weren't even good.
Roy Jones got hit a lot by Montel Griffin.
On Topic: Best defense is Roy Jones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by who_necks View PostI don't think any serious boxing fan questions his talent.
The problem with Floyd is that he probably questions his own talent more than the fans. I believe he could beat the fighters he supposedly avoided but obviously he may not have 100% believed it or put business first.
As far as ability goes, he would have been great in any era of boxing. But has he dared to be great and done all he can to make certain fights happen? Don't get me wrong, he has a lot of great names on his resume, no matter what stage of their careers, to go through those names and not slip up and have a bad night in 47 fights and approaching 40 is incredible. I just feel there's more he could have done to cement himself as one of the greatest. Ability wise, he probably is up there with the best. As far as fighting spirit and the willingness to leave no questions about your legacy, i think he could have done more.
Comment
-
No question he is up there.
But how great really without the hugging, pushing the head/face, headlocks, running?
If so great how come do all of these things which spoil the action, getting the referee involved so many times in the match instead of just fighting?
Comment
Comment