Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do People Forget Cotto Calls The Shots Against Canelo?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
    I'm not criticising Canelo. All I'm saying is that Cotto has the leverage, and I don't see Cotto relinquishing that leverage by fighting in Vegas.

    May 5th is out of the question for a number of reasons. Cotto is just one of the reasons. The other huge reason is Mayweather. If Pacquaio wanted that date, he'd have a chance. Anyone else not named Pacquaio is only dreaming.

    Cotto is going to give all the dreamers a rude awakening when they start seeing his demands and how he throws all of their assumptions in the trash can.
    Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
    I didn't mean 'more lucrative' than the Canelo fight. So my fault if I wrote 'more'. I just meant he has other lucrative options, fights where he can make solid cash outside of Canelo. Whereas Canelo... his options is more limited. Bradley is another fight where Cotto would make good money. Not crazy money, but still solid.

    Cotto is a Free Agent. He works with Top Rank on a fight by fight basis. So he can still do a Mayweather rematch if he wanted.
    havent you seen espinoza bashing on cottos ppv numbers??
    clearly they dont consider him an option at showtime...

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by icha View Post
      so basically you are hoping for cotto to go into diva mode for this fight not to happen... i think he is smarter than that to let a good deal pass away again... and even more i think is some good money involved for arum here to let that happen...
      Cotto will be fighting for New York, for very obvious reasons. VERY. Just like Oscar and Canelo will want Vegas, for obvious reasons. They'll have the fight advantage. Cotto will not let that one happen, unless Canelo is willing to take a very low purse, and even then I highly doubt Cotto would agree.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by icha View Post
        havent you seen espinoza bashing on cottos ppv numbers??
        clearly they dont consider him an option at showtime...
        This is business, Cotto will always be an option at Showtime if he's available. Until Cotto's stock is worthless.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by B0XEO View Post
          Wrong! Canelo/Lara did 230k, while Cotto/Martinez did around 350K.
          You do realize that you're comparing a PPV amongst two of the biggest stars in boxing in the last 10-years (Cotto-Martinez) against a PPV with one if the highest stars presently (Canelo) and a virtually unknown boxer (Lara.) And the Cotto-Martinez PPV barely surpassed the Canelo one. Think about that.
          Last edited by SeekDaGreat; 10-07-2014, 06:18 PM.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by jrrod02 View Post
            I have a feeling that if Cotto starts putting diva like demand on the fight, Canelo and his team will walk away from the negotiations and "squeeze" out a fight with Pacquiao.

            But we'll see. Like I said, I just want the fight to get made. I haven't been excited about a PPV in a long time, and Cotto/Canelo definitely would get the excitment going.
            That is very possible, that Team Canelo could walk away. People assume this is going to be an easy fight to negotiate. The reality is that will is be difficult for a variety of reasons. The venue alone is going to be a huge sticking point. Will Canelo concede to fighting in a venue packed with Ricans? Tough one to answer. Will Cotto be cool with fighting in a venue packed with Mexicans rooting for Canelo? The answer to that is HELL NO.

            I wouldn't be surprised if this fight falls apart in the negotiation table. People say Cotto is a diva, but if Cotto is a diva, then what is Canelo? Wanting to take Mayweather's dates? They are both divas.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
              You do realize that you're comparing a PPV amongst two of the biggest stars in boxing in the last 10-years (Cotto-Martinez) against a PPV with one if the highest stars presently (Canelo) and a virtually unknown boxer (Lara.) And the Cotto-Martinez PPV barely surpassed the Canelo one. Think about that.
              230 was the number for Cotto/Martinez according to Espinoza. Whether that's accurate is up to debate, but regarding the tweet the 230 was in reference to the Cotto fight.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by AnimalisticMeth View Post
                Why is there all this talk about a May date against Canelo? Do people forget cotto calls the shots and decides insted of canelo? For all we know Cotto wants to fight in february and then in june against Canelo. I also doubt cotto wants to go against a mayweather card. So why all the issueabout if the guy that decides will probably pick another date
                I don't think that they forgot as much as they never understood that. At least the fans on this page don't understand that. They don't understand that the guy who brings in the most money -- Cotto -- dictates the terms. They don't understand that Cotto, in the fights where both were considered the A-side fighter, has performed a hell of a lot better on PPV than Alvarez. They don't understand that Alvarez, his promoter and Cotto's faux promoter, Bob Arum, are the only ones talking about a Cotto/Alvarez fight in May 2015. Cotto has not mentioned a word about the possibility of fighting Alvarez, let alone in May.

                Cotto calls the shots, but the Alvarez fans think he does.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Dinamita 03 View Post
                  230 was the number for Cotto/Martinez according to Espinoza. Whether that's accurate is up to debate, but regarding the tweet the 230 was in reference to the Cotto fight.
                  The 230 number was a reference to Alvarez/Lara PPV, not Cotto's. Espinoza was ridiculing Alvarez for drawing such as small number on PPPV. Espinoza would have no way of knowing what the numbers were for Cotto/Martinez.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Cotto is the champ so I see where TS is coming from

                    But Canelo has larger fan base

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by big_james10 View Post
                      The 230 number was a reference to Alvarez/Lara PPV, not Cotto's. Espinoza was ridiculing Alvarez for drawing such as small number on PPPV. Espinoza would have no way of knowing what the numbers were for Cotto/Martinez.
                      Straight from the horses mouth

                      Originally posted by icha View Post
                      this is espinozas twitter
                      230k + 325k < 925k. Cc @FloydMayweather "@mmaencyclopedia I see May being a battle for Cinco de Mayo. CANELO-Cotto will be hard to outdo."

                      ***8212; Stephen Espinoza (@StephenEspinoza) September 26, 2014


                      September 23, 2014

                      Industry sources say Alvarez generated 360,000 pay-per-view buys earlier this year against Alfredo Angulo, and around 325,000 buys vs. Erislandy Lara in July, a bout that competed against the World Cup.
                      “We’re proud of the work we did with ‘Canelo’ in establishing him as pay-per-view star,” Espinoza said. “I’ve heard Cotto’s fight with [Sergio] Martinez did 230,000 buys on HBO. If he thinks that’s a better route … ”

                      http://www.latimes.com/sports/sports...923-story.html


                      credit to dinamita for the source...
                      Espinoza responding to the tweet numbers...

                      [IMG]http://i1329.***********.com/albums/w560/everv11/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsd9eda37e.jpg[/IMG]

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP