Bob Arum is a genius.

[HeGotPacProblem]

That might make sense if Mayweather didn't sign a contract to fight.

Quit living in the past. If Mayweather wasnt such a control freak fight would have been made. Pacman was very much the A side as Floyd baack then. He didnt have to bend over for Floyd over every detail.

It is now 2014, not 2009. The split purse is not the hold up now to current negotiations. Do you see me posting over and over again how Mayweather offered just $40 million to Pacquiao in 2012? You are cherry picking yours arguments for Floyd.

PACMAN HAS conceded TO LESS THAN 50-50 AND VADA NOW.

[luisivich]

That might make sense if Mayweather didn't sign a contract to fight.

we all could speculate, i know how easy to be wrong without reliable source. link please.

[travestyny]

I already answered...JMM is not declining that offer from Pacman. Your question is bs as the offer will NOT be declined by JMM. JMM would love a split purse and no drug testing with Pacman. I don't have time to entertain your hypotheticals so you can cherry pick your arguments. It's like me asking you...will you be a Mayweather fan if he is 57-5?

You already answered? (No you didn't)

But you don't have time to entertain my hypotheticals. (which seems to be your reason for not answering.)

Which one is it?

You know and I know the reason that you won't answer. I only used Marquez because Pac fans like to accuse him of being on roids.

If I said Boxer A signed a contract with a 50/50 split and sent it to Boxer B, but Boxer B refused to accept because of drug testing. Which would you say is ducking?

You still wouldn't answer. And it's clear as day why you won't answer. Was fun witnessing you squirm around it, though.

[HeGotPacProblem]

we all could speculate, i know how easy to be wrong without reliable source. link please.

It's the Yahoo article he posted where Schaffer was quoted.as saying a 50-50 was NEVER offered to Pacman.

[travestyny]

we all could speculate, i know how easy to be wrong without reliable source. link please.

Scroll up. You're coming in late, homie.

[HeGotPacProblem]

You already answered? (No you didn't)

But you don't have time to entertain my hypotheticals. (which seems to be your reason for not answering.)

Which one is it?

You know and I know the reason that you won't answer. I only used Marquez because Pac fans like to accuse him of being on roids.

If I said Boxer A signed a contract with a 50/50 split and sent it to Boxer B, but Boxer B refused to accept because of drug testing. Which would you say is ducking?

You still wouldn't answer. And it's clear as day why you won't answer. Was fun witnessing you squirm around it, though.

PACMAN wasn't the B side in 2009. He is now but not back then.

[travestyny]

It's the Yahoo article he posted where Schaffer was quoted.as saying a 50-50 was NEVER offered to Pacman.

Yep. With Yahoo Sports claiming to have the document in hand. With Mayweather saying himself he signed the contract. With Schafer using language like "I don't recall, and even if it did happen, that doesn't mean 50/50 would be offered now."

[travestyny]

PACMAN wasn't the B side in 2009. He is now but not back then.

Jesus Christ, man. I'm not referring to B sides vs. A sides. Would it make a difference if I said Boxer 1 vs. Boxer 2.

This is why I want to believe you are just trolling.

[HeGotPacProblem]

Yep. With Yahoo Sports claiming to have the document in hand. With Mayweather saying himself he signed the contract. With Schafer using language like "I don't recall, and even if it did happen, that doesn't mean 50/50 would be offered now."

A primer for you on the saga. A 50-50 was not offered in 2009.

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/1627157-mayweather-vs-pacquiao-timeline-of-storied-rivalry

[luisivich]

You already answered? (No you didn't)

But you don't have time to entertain my hypotheticals. (which seems to be your reason for not answering.)

Which one is it?

You know and I know the reason that you won't answer. I only used Marquez because Pac fans like to accuse him of being on roids.

If I said Boxer A signed a contract with a 50/50 split and sent it to Boxer B, but Boxer B refused to accept because of drug testing. Which would you say is ducking?

You still wouldn't answer. And it's clear as day why you won't answer. Was fun witnessing you squirm around it, though.

ok. lets just play along with your narrative. supposing that floyd has handed manny with a signed contract with no cut-off date for blood testing.
and manny has handed floyd a signed contract with a month of cut-off date.
would manny or floyd sign those signed contract. no because they are still negotiating the cut-off date.