Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
    If Fury beats Wlad it will be for the same reason that shot2shyte failure of the Lewis era corrie was able to beat him, because he's better.

    If Fury beats this Wlad, he beats any Wlad.
    Corrie was not better than Wladimir and I'm pretty sure Fury isn't either.

    If Fury beats Wladimir, sure he could very well beat any Wlad then too, because I don't particularly subscribe to the notion that Wlad is a spent force.

    I mean that is really a bit pathetic logic, after Pulev, SUDDENLY Wlad was better than ever, then straight away next fight after Jennings, BOOM he'd done. No gradual slide. This is the sort of reactionary logic that old school fools like you got going on in the first place, and unfortunately the same ******ity exists today, except luckily it is now tempered by SOME reason also.

    Of course, we both know Wlad's gonna knock him out anyway, just like he would have spanked Corrie in a rematch, just like he would have spanked ANY of his conquerers in a rematch..

    And as for Williamson? LOL Your a complete joke!!!

    This was Wlad at his weakest AND on an off night and STILL he won a TD!!

    And don't try to DISCREDIT Williamson by comparing him to a weak version of Ali! No Ali could last a round wit Wlad! Williamson LOOKED like a boxer not a punch bag like your old favourite there!!

    But alas, Williamson is nothing to Wlad overall and woould have been flogged out hard in any rematch.

    Only a total boot lick would dispute anything above!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ThatLeftaMarc
      Quote:

      Originally Posted by KnockoutNed

      If Fury beats Wlad it will be for the same reason that shot2shyte failure of the Lewis era corrie was able to beat him, because he's better.

      If Fury beats this Wlad, he beats any Wlad.

      Lmao, still talking about the old Wlad. He is nothing like his younger years you moron. His chin is better, his style is better, he is stronger, more experienced, he is a different animal now. But you seem to be too thickheaded and biased to accept that.

      Don't worry, your fat piece of **** Fury will turn into Haye #2 very soon
      He's an ageing fighter, only a fool would claim otherwise. You meet that criteria. Your blind man love of Wlad makes you unable to step back and view the fight objectively.

      You are the very definition of a casual.


      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

      Comment


      • People need to realize that Vladimir is way better now in every aspect than he was 10 years ago. You can go on about his 3 defeats all you want. It is not the same fighter.

        Fury would have a bigger chance of beating the Vlad from a decade ago than the Vlad of today.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by ThatLeftaMarc View Post
          Lmao, still talking about the old Wlad. He is nothing like his younger years you moron. His chin is better, his style is better, he is stronger, more experienced, he is a different animal now. But you seem to be too thickheaded and biased to accept that.

          Don't worry, your fat piece of **** Fury will turn into Haye #2 very soon
          his chin is better LOL! you think you can train a chin sir? LOL!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by -Weltschmerz- View Post
            People need to realize that Vladimir is way better now in every aspect than he was 10 years ago. You can go on about his 3 defeats all you want. It is not the same fighter.

            Fury would have a bigger chance of beating the Vlad from a decade ago than the Vlad of today.
            Yeah, I'm not sure why this is beaten to death. The Peter, sanders, Brewster, fights were a rough patch and part of his transition to the fighter he is today. He's gone on to beat better fighters and has looked solid.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
              Wlad did repeat in the corner that he wanted to go on. But Williamson wasn't a beaten man. The doctor stopped the fight on the cut as possible pupil damage could occur.
              How do you know that?. Were you one of his corner men? The scratch was up on the forehead. It was nowhere near the 'pupil' of the eyeball and no where close to being a fight ending cut.
              Wlad got the same cut - if not worse - against Thompson but did not withdraw then because he was in control.

              With due respect to Wlad he came back and fought the biggest threat in the division straight after.
              Sam Peter? I can't give anybody respect for going life and death and having to run , hold and foul against an embarrassment like Peter.
              Watch his fight with Vitali again to see how utterly pathetic he was.

              If Wlad was a great like his clown fans say , Peter would have been running and holding Wlad , not the other way around.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
                Corrie was not better than Wladimir and I'm pretty sure Fury isn't either.
                The undeniable proof that is the actual fight between them over rules your worthless troll opinion ten times outa ten.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by -Weltschmerz- View Post
                  People need to realize that Vladimir is way better now in every aspect than he was 10 years ago. You can go on about his 3 defeats all you want. It is not the same fighter.

                  Fury would have a bigger chance of beating the Vlad from a decade ago than the Vlad of today.
                  Remember the Povertkin fight. Boy , he looked like Larry Holmes in there that night

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by El-blanco View Post
                    Yeah, I'm not sure why this is beaten to death. The Peter, sanders, Brewster, fights were a rough patch and part of his transition to the fighter he is today. He's gone on to beat better fighters and has looked solid.
                    Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
                    is that how you define a better fighter? working on his complete spoiling/holding tactics. the only guy who he doesnt beat on hugging and holding is mayweather.

                    povetkin was his hardest recent fight and he sat on him all night, he couldnt get rid of jennings, granted he ko'd pulev and leapai but they have always been B level fighters, basically like 2 charr's who was ko'd recently, its extremely likely fury would box all these kids into next week apart from povetkin who would put up more resistance.

                    if you weigh it up, and look at wlads hardest most recent fight (which he fought like a complete ******) he hasnt really looked that impressive.

                    his match making is usually on point and i actually think hes going to seriously consider fighting briggs.

                    Comment


                    • I remember Wlad clinching Jennings literally as soon as the bell rang, no punch, just a clinch.

                      Master boxer doe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP