Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

[Elroy1]

Only a minority thought Peter would win and it had everything got to do with Vitali being 38 and having spent the last 4 years in retirement. It had NOTHING to do with Peter being a threat.

Most people knew Vitali could come back after 4 years out and easily beat a bum like Peter.

You mean that feared puncher Peter that was knocking everybody out??

Yeah, what a REAL bum that guy must have been!! LOL

There is only one way to describe the 4 year come-back of Vitali to beat such a menacing opponent as Samuel PEter...

Incredible!

And for those who are unaware exactly who this "bum" PEter was...

http://img.spokeo.com/public/900-600...2007_10_04.jpg

^^That pretty much sums it up!

- Samuel Peter would have been one of the highlights of ANY boxers resume

- You only have a few boxers who could have withstood and beaten Samuel Peter

AND

- NONE of your old time favourite boxers could have ever survived Samuel Peter, let alone beat him.

The facts.

[Elroy1]

What?? Did you just claim Williamson was twitching on the floor. Yes you did.
Makes peferct sense a clown whose profile is riddled in Klitschko fanboi mania would post such a thing.

No you idiot he clearly said that "IT WAS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME" before he WOULD be twitching on the floor (had the fight continued)

Once again, only a complete simpleton as you would even DARE promote a different outcome.

[Elroy1]

Remember the Povertkin fight. Boy , he looked like Larry Holmes in there that night

And what happened the only time Larry Holmes fought somebody comparable to Povetkin???

Tyson KO5 Holmes- his only and most brutal KO loss.

All in all, not a bad effort from Wlad when put in the proper perspective

[1hourRun]

Sky interview - Tyson Fury


-----------------

[billeau2]

You mean that feared puncher Peter that was knocking everybody out??

Yeah, what a REAL bum that guy must have been!! LOL

There is only one way to describe the 4 year come-back of Vitali to beat such a menacing opponent as Samuel PEter...

Incredible!

And for those who are unaware exactly who this "bum" PEter was...

http://img.spokeo.com/public/900-600...2007_10_04.jpg

^^That pretty much sums it up!

- Samuel Peter would have been one of the highlights of ANY boxers resume

- You only have a few boxers who could have withstood and beaten Samuel Peter

AND

- NONE of your old time favourite boxers could have ever survived Samuel Peter, let alone beat him.

The facts.

Sl does that make james Toney....Fat toney evolved also? Cause he beat the feared Samuel Peter. Do you know what a fact is?

[Machinist_X]

He's taken many shots over the years that very well would of put him in his place a little over a decade ago. It's not opinion, he seems to be more resistant.

you cannot physically train a chin, all you can do is strengthen neck muscles but it wont matter because your brain gets rocked around in your skull, claiming a chin improves over time is equally as ******

[Elroy1]

you cannot physically train a chin, all you can do is strengthen neck muscles but it wont matter because your brain gets rocked around in your skull, claiming a chin improves over time is equally as ******

Wladimir never had a weak chin to start with, it was always decent.

And claiming you can't train "chin" is the same as claiming you can't claim punching power- It's old school thinking, totally debunked now days and frankly.. Absolutely ****ing ridiculous!

OF COURSE Wladimir's chin is better now than it was years ago!

Even more benefitting chin than neck muscles is FAT!

IF Wladimir chooses to fight on when his reflexes ad speed and agility (i.e. his "athleticism" begins to decline, he will take more punches and then he SHOULD come in heavier to help absorb those blows whilst further increasing resistance which older boxers can use to their advantage due to their ring intelligence.

"Athleticism" in Heavyweight boxing is MAINLY what YOUNG and INEXPERIENCED fighters, fight with.

Klitschko is special because he combines BOTH!

[Elroy1]

Sl does that make james Toney....Fat toney evolved also? Cause he beat the feared Samuel Peter. Do you know what a fact is?

- James Toney is a modern boxer
- The fat JAmes Toney at HW was more formiddable in "absolute" terms than the young and athletic Middleweight Toney..- OBVIOUSLY!
- James Toney at HW would have beaten ANY of your old favourite pre-Tyson HW's beyond any doubt. Only an 80's Larry Holmes really stands a good shot.

And even more importantly..

- James Toney did well against Peter because he is an excellent boxer and one with a solid chin and defense. but Toney NEVER did beat Peter, that is a fact.

You are out of your depth here old timer!! You've probably never seen Peter or Toney even fight!

[1hourRun]

Banks: Fury not capable


Great interview.

[Machinist_X]

Wladimir never had a weak chin to start with, it was always decent.

And claiming you can't train "chin" is the same as claiming you can't claim punching power- It's old school thinking, totally debunked now days and frankly.. Absolutely ****ing ridiculous!

OF COURSE Wladimir's chin is better now than it was years ago!

Even more benefitting chin than neck muscles is FAT!

IF Wladimir chooses to fight on when his reflexes ad speed and agility (i.e. his "athleticism" begins to decline, he will take more punches and then he SHOULD come in heavier to help absorb those blows whilst further increasing resistance which older boxers can use to their advantage due to their ring intelligence.

"Athleticism" in Heavyweight boxing is MAINLY what YOUNG and INEXPERIENCED fighters, fight with.

Klitschko is special because he combines BOTH!

you talk complete and utter bollocks sir, if its been totally debunked post all this wealth of proof you clearly have