Should Froch be no. 1 if he beats Groves?

[Tom Cruise]

Im still confused as to whose rankings we are talking about here?

Is there some universally accepted ranking that I havent heard of?

[BattlingNelson]

Perception? It's reality. He beat almost everyone at Super Middleweight and all in a convincing manner.

No need to reiterate. I know you think that Ward is to be ranked above Froch as long as he doesn't retire. Thats fair enough. Let him beat bum after bum and keep his no.1 ranking on your personal list.

[BattlingNelson]

Im still confused as to whose rankings we are talking about here?

Is there some universally accepted ranking that I havent heard of?

You can use your personal rankings.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No need to reiterate. I know you think that Ward is to be ranked above Froch as long as he doesn't retire. Thats fair enough. Let him beat bum after bum and keep his no.1 ranking on your personal list.

What bums has Andre Ward fought recently?

Kessler and...?

[BattlingNelson]

What bums has Andre Ward fought recently?

Kessler and...?

No need for that. You can do better.

[Tom Cruise]

If in my own personal rankings then i think i'll keep the best SMW in the world at no.1. Which is clearly Ward

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No need for that. You can do better.

Well answer the question. I'm struggling to see where this idea that Ward is going to fight bum after bum from.

If he'd fought guys like Sartisan, Magee, Perdomo, Bouadla and Haussler then I'd understand where you were coming from.

[slimshandy69]

No need for that. You can do better.

Hes still not used my Tennis ,snooker and golf analogies.

Alot of people dont consider novak Djokovic to be the as hes lost to Nadal than the other way round. But due to Nadals inactivity Djokovic is nuber 1

In snooker ronnie has won more head to heads and won the worlds champions the last two times. But due to inactivity he aint number 1 to mark selby

Adam scott is number 1 currently as woods is injured. Its not on opinion whos better its because woods is inactive.

Ward doesnt even have a scheduled fight, He beat one super middle that didnt make the weight and one shot light heavy and weight drained the **** out of him.

Forch if(big if) he wins has beaten groves, groves, mack, bute, kessler. Bare in mind Bute was anked number 1 above ward at the time.

Froch should be number 1 anyway, but if he wins this hes def number 1.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Hes still not used my Tennis ,snooker and golf analogies.

That's because they're poor analogies. Boxing is different from those sports. They have points systems to determine official rankings. Boxing doesn't have that unless you count boxrec which most people consider a complete joke. You could also mention the laughable Fifa rankings in football which place Colombia at Number 5 over Argentina. It doesn't mean ****

What rankings are we talking about here? Our own personal opinions, no? And if you rank Froch ahead of Ward at Super Middleweight, you're lying to yourself and embarrassing yourself.

[BattlingNelson]

Well answer the question. I'm struggling to see where this idea that Ward is going to fight bum after bum from.

If he'd fought guys like Sartisan, Magee, Perdomo, Bouadla and Haussler then I'd understand where you were coming from.

Is it possible for you to rank Froch above Ward if they never rematch and Ward remains undefeated?