Golovkin was an impressive amateur, his record is to be respected. You don't go 350-5 against even complete duds unless you have some talent but as it stands right now, hes done very little of note in the pros.
And I'm really struggling to get how people are knocking Sergio's opposition/resume when his resume is stacked.
Hes beaten world champions, unified world champions, multiple undefeated top 10 opponents, massive punchers and a variety of different styles.
GGG hasn't fought anybody, the only guy anywhere the top 10 was Macklin who may not even be in the top 3 in the U.K alone!
Okay Rosado is a bit better than he gets credit for & his record suggests but again he wasn't ranked, he hasn't beaten anybody of any real note & was moving up from 154.
Why not break the fight down? Make an argument for HOW GGG wins because when it comes down to resumes there really is only one winner there.
And I'm really struggling to get how people are knocking Sergio's opposition/resume when his resume is stacked.
Hes beaten world champions, unified world champions, multiple undefeated top 10 opponents, massive punchers and a variety of different styles.
GGG hasn't fought anybody, the only guy anywhere the top 10 was Macklin who may not even be in the top 3 in the U.K alone!
Okay Rosado is a bit better than he gets credit for & his record suggests but again he wasn't ranked, he hasn't beaten anybody of any real note & was moving up from 154.
Why not break the fight down? Make an argument for HOW GGG wins because when it comes down to resumes there really is only one winner there.
Comment