Is there really any fighter in boxing history that is unquestionably

[J The UnBiased]

I never left. You, though, went off on a tangent talking about your non-existant ****. Although it's pretty clear that you know a lot more about ****s than you do about boxing.

..........I know right, so don't converse with me. Cool?

[J The UnBiased]

But but but but but , Marquez and his trainers opinion out weighs yours by a country mile , they both want nothing to do with fighting Floyd again even after stiffening Manny they still don't want Floyd , now just have a little think about that for one second !!

How dare you bring up facts?

[ßringer]

Aren't you the same guy that started threads in regards to Canelo's ****? Bye.

Those were highly informative threads, I'll have you know. Look at the views and responses and then compare it to your thread starting history and get back to me.

[T18Z]

Those were highly informative threads, I'll have you know. Look at the views and responses and then compare it to your thread starting history and get back to me.

Your thread had me laughing IRL for a while haha, definitely brought a nice humorous change to the forums.

[vacon04]

How many guys in the history of sport would've clearly beat or even KO Canelo Alvarez? I would say many, in fact I can name at least a couple that could beat Canelo including Lara or even Molina.

Good win for Floyd, but Canelo is nothing special, I've said it before the fight and I say it now again. I think many guys including SRL, Hearns, Lopez, SRR, Duran, maybe even Chavez Sr at hist prime, Salvador Sanchez, etc could beat Mayweather Jr.

Would they surely beat him? No, but hey could have done it.

[ßringer]

But but but but but , Marquez and his trainers opinion out weighs yours by a country mile , they both want nothing to do with fighting Floyd again even after stiffening Manny they still don't want Floyd , now just have a little think about that for one second !!

Because Mayweather beats any version of Marquez that there is. ****ing obviously.

That said, it's not a reason to place Mayweather above Pacquiao in terms of accomplishment and resume. Talent? Sure. Floyd beats Manny all day every day in that department, but his resume isn't on Pacquiao's level nor are his in-ring accomplishments.

10 time world champion including 8 titles in 8 divisions, brah.

[J The UnBiased]

Those were highly informative threads, I'll have you know. Look at the views and responses and then compare it to your thread starting history and get back to me.

I don't start threads young man, it's not really my thing. Especially those that involve marveling at a penis.

[ßringer]

I don't start threads young man, it's not really my thing. Especially those that involve marveling at a penis.

Excuses.

Allow me to put it into terms that your Mayweather loving brain can comprehend : Thread views and thread replies = PPV numbers. I'm a cash cow here, and you're not even worthy of being on my undercards.

on these haters.

[junior gong]

I don't start threads young man, it's not really my thing. Especially those that involve marveling at a penis.

You are a big tmt fan, so spending an inordinate amount of time ogling a bunch of pricks is actually very much your thing. Holding up reloaded as a fact guru isnt a good look either Mr.'unbiased'.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Floyd is def one of the greatest ever,,

but i would still favor:
SRR
SRL
Hearns
Ali if they were the same size......

But floyd is def one of the best ever,,, no doubt