Mayweather Standards?
Collapse
-
not really but for floyd, i guess you could say stronger than normal
No he wasn't coming up 2 divisions. He has already fought floyd at WW and his fight right before manny was at 140. not the same thing. 18 months before the floyd fight jmm was fighting at 130 and had never fought over 130.
ok, I'll start.
bernard hopkins. shane mosley at 154.
now your turn.Last edited by Walt Liquor; 01-08-2013, 10:25 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Strong, period. Marquez, Mosley, the top fighter at 154. Not bad at all.
Not sure where you're getting your info from. Marquez was the lightweight champ when he fought Floyd.No he wasn't coming up 2 divisions. He has already fought floyd at WW and his fight right before manny was at 140. not the same thing. 18 months before the floyd fight jmm was fighting at 130 and had never fought over 130.
Bernard Hopkins was an impressive loss at a catchweight. Shane Mosley was a heavy, heavy underdog when he fought Oscar. I'm not sure who told you that was some big risk he was taking but try to remember the talk BEFORE that fight, not after.bernard hopkins. shane mosley at 147.
Diego Corrales. Jose Luis Castillonow your turn.Comment
-
Floyd takes the fights for least risk, most reward. That's fine. But it's also why he isn't the greatest fighter of this or any generation.
I don't expect him to fight at 154, but if he does, I do expect him to fight the best fighters capable of competing there. ginger is nothing but a hype job. I do not have a problem with the Ghost at welterweight though, that's a solid fight.Comment
-
Just going off Kevin Iole's article on Yahoo which states that documents released post-negotiation showed that, on behalf of Floyd Mayweather, GBP sent a proposal over for Manny Pacquiao to sign that included a 50-50 split, OST, and was "so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather)."
That's all. So yeah, doesn't look like he passed over everything. I'd say the other side --who never drew up a proposal, who never signed anything and umm, who walked away from the negotiating table?--passed up on it.Comment
-
cotto was not the best fighter at 154
that's what I said, but he was only 2 fights deep into his lw career.
let me ask you a question. does a fighter grow into a weight class or would a guy who fights at 147 for the 4th time be the same stature-wise as his first fight at 147 when he jumped a weight class to get there.
I changed it to Shane at 154 before you answered.Bernard Hopkins was an impressive loss at a catchweight. Shane Mosley was a heavy, heavy underdog when he fought Oscar. I'm not sure who told you that was some big risk he was taking but try to remember the talk BEFORE that fight, not after.
Diego Corrales. Jose Luis Castillo
And so now we're talking wins, not risks? Are you changing the story or not? Is it comp or is it wins we're talking about?
Tito Trinidad, Shane at 154, Bhop at 156.Comment
-
Perhaps he wasn't and I'm forgetting someone?
A cherry pick for Pacquiao regardless.that's what I said, but he was only 2 fights deep into his lw career.
I'd save it takes several fights, not one fight at the weight in three years.let me ask you a question. does a fighter grow into a weight class or would a guy who fights at 147 for the 4th time be the same stature-wise as his first fight at 147 when he jumped a weight class to get there.
Oh yes, the Shane who hadn't won a fight in two years. HUGE risk by Oscar thereI changed it to Shane at 154 before you answered.
Not sure what you're referring to. I said the Hopkins fight was a risk...and a loss at a catchweight. Both Mosley fights weren't mega risks and he was a heavy favorite for both. So scratch that. So far you've given me Tito and Hops at a catchweight. I've given you Corrales, Castillo, and I'll give you a Mosley who was a bigger risk than either version Oscar fought without hindsight.And so now we're talking wins, not risks? Are you changing the story or not? Is it comp or is it wins we're talking about?Comment
-
was it not public knowledge that manny wouldn't go for his ost demands? the ones specifically in that contract?Just going off Kevin Iole's article on Yahoo which states that documents released post-negotiation showed that, on behalf of Floyd Mayweather, GBP sent a proposal over for Manny Pacquiao to sign that included a 50-50 split, OST, and was "so detailed that it indicates which of the two fighters would step onto the scale first at the weigh-in (Pacquiao), who would walk to the ring first (Pacquiao), who would be introduced first (Mayweather) and who had first choice of the locker room (Mayweather)."
That's all. So yeah, doesn't look like he passed over everything. I'd say the other side --who never drew up a proposal, who never signed anything and umm, who walked away from the negotiating table?--passed up on it.Comment
-
shane already beat him, so I'd say its a risk automatically.Perhaps he wasn't and I'm forgetting someone?
A cherry pick for Pacquiao regardless.
I'd save it takes several fights, not one fight at the weight in three years.
Oh yes, the Shane who hadn't won a fight in two years. HUGE risk by Oscar there
Not sure what you're referring to. I said the Hopkins fight was a risk...and a loss at a catchweight. Both Mosley fights weren't mega risks and he was a heavy favorite for both. So scratch that. So far you've given me Tito and Hops at a catchweight. I've given you Corrales, Castillo, and I'll give you a Mosley who was a bigger risk than either version Oscar fought without hindsight.
you act like shane was doing nothing in those two years. he lost to forrest for the real ww title twice.Comment
Comment