Has Froch surpassed Calzaghe's achievements?
Collapse
-
-
not quite...the way froch is always in wars because of his limitations and the way calzaghe adapted makes me favour joe..also if froch was better technically he wouldn't have lost his titles and won them back (mainly not won from a champ) froch wouldn't in a million years go half as long defending a title, froch will lose the ibf belt in his next fight or two guaranteed then get another vacant alphabet title win it and shamefully be called a four time champ...boxing is a mess
Comment
-
-
Froch.....Hopkins was at his best when he was king of the middleweight divison, Calzaghe waited until Hopkins and Jones were past their primes to fight them.
Carl Froch enters the Super six tournament and fights the best one after another and then fights unbeaten Lucian Bute who everyone thought would beat him.
War Froch !!
Froch....
Comment
-
Im probably the biggest Froch fan youll ever meet, but he doesnt have **** on Joe. Joe was naturally quick and much more fluid with his movements. He was smart, and controlled an entire fight. Never looked awkward.
Why dont you ask Kessler who the superior fighter is?Comment
-
the thread doen't say who was the better fighter, the thread says has Froch surpassed Calzaghe's achievements? the answer is yesComment
-
Comment
-

Comment