I think most people have become used to seeing Floyd dominate opponents, but it's not as if every one of Floyd's fights have been dominant performances. He's had trouble with a good amount of fighters in his career. Since his fight with De La Hoya, it's really hard to look at the stock of guys he's fought since and say each guy is better or would beat Cotto. Of course styles make fights, but let's simply take a look.
Would Cotto NOT beat any of the fighters Floyd's beaten since Oscar? He already beat a younger and more active version of Mosley, and I'll leave everyone to judge fights w/ JMM, Hatton, and Ortiz and Welterweight, be my guest.
I definitely can understand Floyd being the favorite in this fight, it's not something I think should be disputed. But to say Cotto has no shot and or will not be any challenge whatsoever to Floyd I think is a bit of blasphemy. Think about it, do people really think Cotto IS NOT Floyd's best opponent since De La Hoya (or maybe even better)?
Would Cotto NOT beat any of the fighters Floyd's beaten since Oscar? He already beat a younger and more active version of Mosley, and I'll leave everyone to judge fights w/ JMM, Hatton, and Ortiz and Welterweight, be my guest.
I definitely can understand Floyd being the favorite in this fight, it's not something I think should be disputed. But to say Cotto has no shot and or will not be any challenge whatsoever to Floyd I think is a bit of blasphemy. Think about it, do people really think Cotto IS NOT Floyd's best opponent since De La Hoya (or maybe even better)?
Comment