Now? Mayweather is a bigger draw, but only because DLH has been out of the game for years now.
Is Floyd a bigger draw than Oscar was?
Collapse
-
-
Oscar was/is the bigger draw! Here's the thing, Oscar's time was from the mid 90's to 2004. It isn't even fair to compare the numbers that Oscar did then to what Floyd is doing now. Let me break it down for you, pactards.
In the 90's to about 03 there used to be little black boxes that gave you illegal cable with free PPV. Imagine the numbers Oscar would have done if these were HIS days? He'd blow Floyd out of the water, and stomp on Pac's pathetic numbers.Comment
-
Don't bother dis*****g this. People with at least a middle school education would understand this but unfortunatelly we are dealing with some special folks here.Oscar was/is the bigger draw! Here's the thing, Oscar's time was from the mid 90's to 2004. It isn't even fair to compare the numbers that Oscar did then to what Floyd is doing now. Let me break it down for you, pactards.
In the 90's to about 03 there used to be little black boxes that gave you illegal cable with free PPV. Imagine the numbers Oscar would have done if these were HIS days? He'd blow Floyd out of the water, and stomp on Pac's pathetic numbers.
*******s
*Teenagers
*Mentally handicapped
*"Boxing fans" that saw their first fight after 2005
*Some could be ****sexuals
*Fanatics
*Last but not least ******s.Comment
-
The question should read "Who has benefitted from their media exposure the most...Floyd or De La Hoya"
The way the thread reads now, I feel it's implied that bigger draw= better fighter and fights. Not exactly.
But as far as taking advantage of media outlets for the time, Floyd has garnered the greater exposure, positive or negative...that has equated to more PPV sales.
BUT I WILL SAY THIS....
Oscar was more of an event maker than Floyd is now. Regardless of numbers, when Oscar fought in his prime, it was an event that you had to watch and be a part of. Floyd is similar, but not quite the same. Maybe the bad guy performance plays against him in this respect, but there just isn't that same aura.
Come to think of it, it may be overexposure on the part of Floyd that keeps his fights from being as "gotta see it" as DLH's were back in the day.
And I say this as a 38 year old man who watched oscar coming up through the ranks even on espn back in the day.Last edited by 1nonlymre; 03-16-2012, 09:44 PM.Comment
-
Such weak arguments and utter garbage in this thread. Anything but "the numbers say Floyd is a bigger draw." Even worse, an Oscar fan started this thread and he acknowledges Floyd has surpassed Oscar, and it's not that close.
I'm out, let the hate reign down
Comment
-
Floyd has higher numbers. Floyd sold about the same number of PPV facing Victor Ortiz as DLH did facing Shane Mosley. That puts your little theory to ****.Comment
-
Well thats not even a fair comparison. Reading this thread Ive learned that most people (especially **********) did not have cable TV or the internet in 2002.
Im sure in 1992 when Michael Jordan was playing, only about 5% of households had a TV, and half of those that did had a black and white TV which made watching the NBA less enjoyable than now.Comment
-
Spoken like a true hater. None of those guys like canelo,marquez or ortiz could ever sell a miillion ppv buys. only a fool would even say some dumb ***** like that. Mayweather is a house hold name. hes known around the world by all races,genders,and ages. stop being a hater , saying ****** **** son.Comment
Comment