Vitali Klitschko has lost fewer rds than ANY boxing champion in the history of boxing

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Wow.. so you actually just admitted Vitali is a better fighter than Sam Peter.. give the guy a medal.. I guess one man's prime is another man's retirement pension fund.. all depends on a fighters worth.

Its not hard to be better than Sam Peter

Vitali continues to fight on against overmatched opponents because his "retirement pension fund" is nowhere near what Lennox's was and it never will be.

[jimmy1569]

Its not hard to be better than Sam Peter

Vitali continues to fight on against overmatched opponents because his "retirement pension fund" is nowhere near what Lennox's was and it never will be.

Lol @ you insinuating the brother's can't compete with the earning s of LL. NoW i've heard it all. stick with your brethren till the very end.. DD

ThE kLITSCHKO'S get double figure millions fighting overmatched.. opponents.

[squealpiggy]

I distinctly remember a heavyweight coming out of retirement with almost 4 full years (almost qualifies for a leap yr) with the SAME exact scenario you described that was right around his prime with even more rust to shake off & go straight to the top fighter ranked in the division not NAMED his brother & completely dominate him.. so thanks for pointing out who's got the better resume after 38 yrs of age.

Yes, he fought Sugar Sam Peter didn't he?

[Sage84]

Vitali is not even in the Top 50 HW's of all time, never mind the best.

He has fought bum after bum and lost to the best fighter he faced. That isn't greatness. No matter how many of you whine and stamp your feet those are the FACTS, and they aren't going to change.

[jimmy1569]

Vitali is not even in the Top 50 HW's of all time, never mind the best.

He has fought bum after bum and lost to the best fighter he faced. That isn't greatness. No matter how many of you whine and stamp your feet those are the FACTS, and they aren't going to change.

Lol @ your worthless 2 cents being stated as facts... so 50 heavyweights now have better resumes than the most dominant heavyweight that ever lived.

Gimme all the names... son.. this i'd like to hear.

[JAB5239]

Vitali is not even in the Top 50 HW's of all time, never mind the best.

He has fought bum after bum and lost to the best fighter he faced. That isn't greatness. No matter how many of you whine and stamp your feet those are the FACTS, and they aren't going to change.

I like to break balls as much as the next guy, but lets not take it out of the realm of reality. Vitaly is a top 25 all time heavyweight.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lol @ you insinuating the brother's can't compete with the earning s of LL. NoW i've heard it all. stick with your brethren till the very end.. DD

ThE kLITSCHKO'S get double figure millions fighting overmatched.. opponents.

They cant.

Thats why Vitali is still calling out Lennox for a rematch

[jimmy1569]

Yes, he fought Sugar Sam Peter didn't he?

If we make one of those connection trees... you'll see how he got the name Sugar.. let's see this is the same Samuel Peter that Ko'ed Maskaev who Ko'ed Rahman who ko'ed that English fighter... i forgot his name.....

[Deal With It]

Vitali is not even in the Top 50 HW's of all time, never mind the best.

He has fought bum after bum and lost to the best fighter he faced. That isn't greatness. No matter how many of you whine and stamp your feet those are the FACTS, and they aren't going to change.

^^^^^
THIS

Honestly, Vitali shouldn't even be rated at all. He's not even a top 3 Heavyweight of his own era. You don't see people rating Chris Byrd & David Tua as ATGs do ya? BOTH have greater resumes than Vitali.

You can also make a case for Ibeabuchi being rated higher than Vitali. He out****** a prime Tua and in only 5 rounds, knocked Byrd into a temporary state of ******ation.

To rate a guy who is only 4th or 5th best of his era, IN THE WORST ERA EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, is just simply (to quote the great philosopher Mike Tyson) ludicrous.

[Superflo777]

^^^^^
THIS

Honestly, Vitali shouldn't even be rated at all. He's not even a top 3 Heavyweight of his own era. You don't see people rating Chris Byrd & David Tua as ATGs do ya? BOTH have greater resumes than Vitali.

You can also make a case for Ibeabuchi being rated higher than Vitali. He out****** a prime Tua and in only 5 rounds, knocked Byrd into a temporary state of ******ation.

To rate a guy who is only 4th or 5th best of his era, IN THE WORST ERA EVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE HEAVYWEIGHT DIVISION, is just simply (to quote the great philosopher Mike Tyson) ludicrous.

The guy who said Vitali is not in the top 50 is clearly out of his mind, so are you if you claim Chris Byrd and Tua (who recently lost to Monte freakin' Barrett) both have greater resumes than him. But hey, they're all bums compared to future HOF'er Deontay Wilder, who beats a prime Mike Tyson and a prime Muhammad Ali, right?