Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vitali Klitschko has lost fewer rds than ANY boxing champion in the history of boxing

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by House of Stone View Post
    But when he faced an all time great he lost. Winning every round against average guys but losing against the only top ten/twenty all time great fighter that you ever fought is not that impressive really. And I'm not interested in all the excuses for that Lewis fight - he was tko'd end of and if the doc hadn't stepped in to save him he could have suffered permanent damage to his sight.
    He was beating Lennox and lost on cuts. What part of that do you people not grasp exactly? This is getting ridiculous.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by jimmy1569 View Post
      Can you guys name a titlist that has lost fewer rds than him in any era or any weight class? Just for verification... the magic number is about a dozen rds or less.
      Saul Alvarez for one.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Dubblechin View Post
        Saul Alvarez for one.
        Andre Ward for two.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Dubblechin View Post
          Andre Ward for two.

          Gennady Golovkin for three.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Dubblechin View Post
            Gennady Golovkin for three.
            You have to take into consideration the number of title fights those guys have had. Not only that, Martinez lost more rounds to Cintron that Vitali has lost in his last ten fights combined.

            Comment


            • Well David Haye is going to show him up in March

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Mr. Invincible View Post
                You have to take into consideration the number of title fights those guys have had. Not only that, Martinez lost more rounds to Cintron that Vitali has lost in his last ten fights combined.
                The guy asked if any champion in any division in the history of the sport had lost so few rounds ... and my point is there are champs NOW who have lost fewer rounds.

                (And I never brought up Sergio Martinez. But Sergio Martinez didn't lose 12 or 14 rounds to Cintron, or however many rounds Vitali has lost.)

                Whatever. It's a dumb topic. There are always dominant champs who rarely lose a round. When Vitali's career is over, that's when the question should be asked. Because, if you ask it now, there are other current champs who are just as dominant in their fights.

                Vitali does have a lot of one-sided wins, then again, he's never even attempted to unify any of the belts (even when his brother didn't have a title). Saul Alvarez and Andre Ward could dominate forever if they were content to defend their one belt and never took on another champ.
                Last edited by Dubblechin; 11-29-2011, 11:29 AM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Mr. Invincible View Post
                  He was beating Lennox and lost on cuts. What part of that do you people not grasp exactly? This is getting ridiculous.
                  What part of that's part of boxing do you not grasp?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                    What part of that's part of boxing do you not grasp?

                    Even the TS understands that.

                    Here's a rant he made on another nuthugging Vitali thread he made a while back

                    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=503090


                    Originally posted by jimmy1569 View Post
                    & one MORE thing about the GREATEST knockout artist in the history of heavyweight boxing.. Knockouts to him are ANY form of a stoppage... as long as you DON'T survive the full 12.. he could care less how he attains it.. If THE REF stops it so be it... if the dr stops it so be it... if the fighter himself says no mas so be it... if the fighter's corner throws in the towel so be it... knockout;'s to Him IS YOU NOT LASTING 12... He'S BEEN ABLE TO get the treasured stoppages 88.64 % of the time...The 3 times a fighter has played defense & lasted all 12.... it's been a 36 rds to none SHUTOUT... THE TWO TIMES HE FAILED TO WIN A FIGHT.... he won 12 of 15 rds.. so IF YOU'RE not getting stopped by him EXPECT to win 3 rds out of 51 RDS FOUGHT.. Funny how that 94% scorecard ratio is EXACTLY the same against the 39 fighters he stopped & the 5 fighters he FAILED to halt.

                    As you can see Byrd.. Hoffman Lewis.. Johnson & Briggs all in chronological order all had what it takes to survive but ALL COLLECTIVELY suffered the same exact beatdown as those who failed to make the bell.. scorecard wise.. exactly the same beatdowns.

                    So like i said.. you choose how you go out against Vitali Klitschko but you'll be getting DOMINAted just the same when it comes time for the scorecards to be read. I just read them to you & it's always in Vitali's favor 94 to 95 % of the time regardless of the outcome of the bouts.. my bad as it was ONLY 80% of the time when he lost... afterall he's only human OTHERWise the most dominating fighter in boxing history would just be some aforementioned programmed 'robot' But we all Know that's not the case... right?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
                      I was talking about the poster Mr. Invincible.......moron.
                      Yes.. but you were poking fun of Klitschko who most say WAS the better man that night against Lewis by equating it with the Foreman bout which had no parallel at all. Moorer did NOT outslug Big George like Vitali did to Lennox... didn't have Big George on ***** street like Vitali had LL & had fine porcelain for a chin & got KTFO & counted out while being in dreamland. Vitali was ready willing & able to continue taking it to LL well after the quack doctor at ringside gave LL an early christmas present>>>> kapish...... MORON!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP