Both Klitschko's top 10 alltime Heavyweights

[JAB5239]

The Klits achievements are like letting a prime Roger Clemens pitch against a little league team. Sure, someone my get their bat on the ball, but the competition sucks! Great stats against inept comp means nothing. But hey, if it makes you feel good to spout this nonsense than feel free!

[S.J. II]

Isnt it ironic that most of the Klit lickers churn out repetitive and meaningless "statistics" like robots.

You're just a hater. In the years I've dedicated to this forum, I've seen you display your negativity about everything non-British in boxing. Your life sucks bro.

[S.J. II]

The Klits achievements are like letting a prime Roger Clemens pitch against a little league team. Sure, someone my get their bat on the ball, but the competition sucks! Great stats against inept comp means nothing. But hey, if it makes you feel good to spout this nonsense than feel free!

The Klitschkos will forever be Danny Almonte.

[KickAzz]

if they retired today atop the heavyweight landscape... there records combined are 49.5 W's, 2.5 L'S 44.5 ko's = 52 fights 86% ko>>> 92% scorecard ratio>>>95% winning ratio.. Those numbers dwarf most if NOT all of the top 10 greats... i would rank them 1 & 2 based on there dominance but I know how dominance gets downplayed on the forums.... we want to see in our alltime greats parody... close split decisions.. double knockouts... who needs one dimensional dominance.. that's too boring.. The Klits are 1 & 2 today but i'm here to tell you they are 1 & 2 alltime as well.

they are definitely not 1 & 2... and I don't even think they are top 10 all time HWs...

[Jedi Vader]

Those stats only have credence if they're backed up with fighting and defeating ATG's.

So I ask, what illustrious ATG's did the Klits beat in their careers???

[0r1g1nal S1n]

No where near the top ten. They might even be too big for some top 10 guys but it's about who you beat not who you could beat!

[JAB5239]

The Klitschkos will forever be Danny Almonte.

Lol, I doubt half the posters here remember that name. When was that, 1998, 1999? What ever happened to him?

[BennyST]

wHO'S spinning.... you listed a factual occurence in terms of Tko Klitschko... i listed factual data as well that happened in the fight....

The only thing that matters at the end of the day is this: Lennox stopped Vitali. The best fighter, and only good/great fighter, that Vitali has ever fought stopped him.

Boxing is not a numbers game. Even if it was, you're looking at it the wrong way. Harry Greb has 300 fights, only 11 losses and beat about 14 HOFers. That's probably about as many title fights as Vitali has against crappy non titlist, boris contender chumps.

Boxing is about who you beat. Otherwise, all those undefeated champions beat Vitali in numbers. He got stopped, he quit, he lost, they didn't. It doesn't work that way though.

Duran has one win that is better than every win combined by the Klitschko's. Leonard has the same. Ali the same, etc etc. Boxing is not about useless numbers against opposition that means nothing. You could argue til the cows come home that Valero is as good as the Klits if not better than. He's clearly not, but his numbers are better.

Get it?

No?

Well, I didn't think you would anyway so don't worry too much. Everyone is laughing at this stuff you write anyway.

[kiDynamite92]

his scorecard ratio is at best 70% fighting even more bums than you say the Klitschko's have faced..... & Vitali destroys Marciano in every intangible & is the closest to undefeated as it gets.

Ha were looking at stats here are we not? He's undefeated unlike vitali, so statistically he's better ya! And idk what your talking about, lennox kicked his a$$ fair and square, get the fcuk over it son.

[JAB5239]

The only thing that matters at the end of the day is this: Lennox stopped Vitali. The best fighter, and only good/great fighter, that Vitali has ever fought stopped him.

Boxing is not a numbers game. Even if it was, you're looking at it the wrong way. Harry Greb has 300 fights, only 11 losses and beat about 14 HOFers. That's probably about as many title fights as Vitali has against crappy non titlist, boris contender chumps.

Boxing is about who you beat. Otherwise, all those undefeated champions beat Vitali in numbers. He got stopped, he quit, he lost, they didn't. It doesn't work that way though.

Duran has one win that is better than every win combined by the Klitschko's. Leonard has the same. Ali the same, etc etc. Boxing is not about useless numbers against opposition that means nothing. You could argue til the cows come home that Valero is as good as the Klits if not better than. He's clearly not, but his numbers are better.

Get it?

No?

Well, I didn't think you would anyway so don't worry too much. Everyone is laughing at this stuff you write anyway.

One of boxingscenes most knowledgable and informative posters has spoken. Time to get out of Dodge or back on your sit-n-spin!