Both Klitschko's top 10 alltime Heavyweights

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Die Antwoord
    Undisputed Champion
    • Aug 2010
    • 1254
    • 182
    • 21
    • 7,539

    #11
    Originally posted by maricónweather
    will most likely beat them klits. agree with others mentioned though.fraizer and louis would be a 50/50.imo
    Prime tyson struggled more with Bustard Douglas than Vitali did in his career. Chuck Wepner wasa full time police officer and was ranked number 8 in the world when he fought Ali...Vitali would KO anyone from the 70's probably int he first 6 rounds.

    Comment

    • Deal With It
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2011
      • 423
      • 54
      • 41
      • 603

      #12
      Deontay Wilder

      100% KO ratio
      100% Winning percentage
      Never lost a round
      There's NO blueprint to beat Deontay Wilder



      The true GOAT

      Comment

      • Deal With It
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • May 2011
        • 423
        • 54
        • 41
        • 603

        #13
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Isnt it ironic that most of the Klit lickers churn out repetitive and meaningless "statistics" like robots.
        Ironic? No. Actually, it's fitting.

        Comment

        • maricónweather
          Banned
          • Oct 2011
          • 65
          • 3
          • 0
          • 111

          #14
          Originally posted by Die Antwoord
          Prime tyson struggled more with Bustard Douglas than Vitali did in his career. Chuck Wepner wasa full time police officer and was ranked number 8 in the world when he fought Ali...Vitali would KO anyone from the 70's probably int he first 6 rounds.


          ofcourse all ATG had their off night and fought a couple of bums on their way to the belt.

          those are speculations. based on their resume i highly doubt that

          Comment

          • Deal With It
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2011
            • 423
            • 54
            • 41
            • 603

            #15
            Originally posted by Die Antwoord
            Prime tyson struggled more with Bustard Douglas than Vitali did in his career. Chuck Wepner wasa full time police officer and was ranked number 8 in the world when he fought Ali...Vitali would KO anyone from the 70's probably int he first 6 rounds.
            In his entire career, Vitali has only fought 2 fighters that can be considered equal to or greater than Buster Douglas...and guess what? He loss both of those fights.

            Comment

            • jimmy1569
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2005
              • 2920
              • 114
              • 0
              • 3,083

              #16
              Originally posted by Rocky Rode
              Lies.

              Michael Jordan doesn't have the best stats or the most titles, but he's still considered the #1 player of all time.
              You're a moron... he MORE than has the best career numbers. He has the HIGHEST PER IN NBA HISTORY... not WILT Chamberlain & it's the highest in both regular season & the playoffs just to make sure. Also the name of the game is put points up to help your team.. MJ IS BY FAR THE BEST SCORER IN NBA HISTORY.... NOT WILT... & JUST TO MAKE SURE it's for the playoffs & the regular season... so save me the bs about Wilt's 50 pt season & 100 pt game.. his ENTIRE BODY OF WORK DOESN'T EVEN COME CLOSE TO MJ... THEY BOTH FINISHED AT 30.1 (MJ SLIGHTLY AHEAD) but if Mj WERE afforded the same 45 plus minutes a game Wilt played every game... his average would be 36.1... so basicallly the difference btween them is MJ SCORED 6 more points than him EVERY 48 MINUTE CYCLE..... THE playoff s.. you can nearly double it & Bill Russell in his tainted 11 rchampionships won less games ..less series & had a lower winning percentage than Mj's 6 rings... Translation.. Mj 24 series won in 6 rings... Russell 22 series won in 11 rings.. so who won More games & eliminated more teams & many more players during his championship reign... Russell or Jordan... that just shows you how fuagazy Russell's championships are as compared to Mj.. he ONLY WON 91.6 % OF THE playoff series Mj did.. translation.


              . Russell's REAL rING TALLY is 5.5 RINGS TO MJ'S 6 & mj WAS THE mvp OF EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE 24 SERIES BY FAR.... RUSSELL AT BEST was no more than half of the time Mvp OF HIS 22 SERIES... MJ IS THE MOST DOMINANT WINNER OF ALLTIME.. HE LED THE ENTIRE LEAGUE REG SEASON & PLAYOFFS IN SCORING IN ALL 6 CHAMPIONSHIP years. His teams OWN THE TOP 2 BEST RECORDS IN NBA HISTORY BACK TO BACK 72 & 69 WINS RESPECTIVELY.. 70.5 WINS 11.5 LOSSES IN CONSECUTIVE YEARS IS UNPRECEDENTED.... so i suggest you apologize. MJ IS THE BEST BY THE NUMBERS & REALLY THE BEST WINNER AS WELL.. DEFINTELY THE MOST DOMINANT WINNER that's for sure.

              Comment

              • jimmy1569
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2005
                • 2920
                • 114
                • 0
                • 3,083

                #17
                Originally posted by Player3
                Deontay Wilder

                100% KO ratio
                100% Winning percentage
                Never lost a round
                There's NO blueprint to beat Deontay Wilder



                The true GOAT
                The blueprint is to make him taste canvas & shatter the glass jaw!

                Sure... he never lost a rd but somehow managed to win a rd he tasted canvas in.. pathetic rebuttal... try again. & the record is 27 - 0 27 ko's while NOT losing or almost losing a rd to hide but kfto in the very next minute>>> kapish!
                Last edited by jimmy1569; 10-30-2011, 11:23 PM.

                Comment

                • daggum
                  All time great
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 43681
                  • 4,650
                  • 3
                  • 166,270

                  #18
                  how can you be the greatest when you refuse to fight the best fighter in your own division?

                  if you like stats ali beat 31 guys in the top 10 and 16 at the time were in the top 3. wlad has beaten 11 and only 3 were in the top 3 and vitali has beaten 7 and 3 were in the top 3. ali fought everyone who ever entered the top 3 from 1962-1978 except thad spencer who fell off. dominating against bums fools so many people.

                  Comment

                  • Rocky Rode
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 1396
                    • 47
                    • 40
                    • 7,962

                    #19
                    Originally posted by jimmy1569
                    You're a moron... he MORE than has the best career numbers. He has the HIGHEST PER IN NBA HISTORY... not WILT Chamberlain & it's the highest in both regular season & the playoffs just to make sure. Also the name of the game is put points up to help your team.. MJ IS BY FAR THE BEST SCORER IN NBA HISTORY.... NOT WILT... & JUST TO MAKE SURE it's for the playoffs & the regular season... so save me the bs about Wilt's 50 pt season & 100 pt game.. his ENTIRE BODY OF WORK DOESN'T EVEN COME CLOSE TO MJ... THEY BOTH FINISHED AT 30.1 (MJ SLIGHTLY AHEAD) but if Mj WERE afforded the same 45 plus minutes a game Wilt played every game... his average would be 36.1... so basicallly the difference btween them is MJ SCORED 6 more points than him EVERY 48 MINUTE CYCLE..... THE playoff s.. you can nearly double it & Bill Russell in his tainted 11 rchampionships won less games ..less series & had a lower winning percentage than Mj's 6 rings... Translation.. Mj 24 series won in 6 rings... Russell 22 series won in 11 rings.. so who won More games & eliminated more teams & many more players during his championship reign... Russell or Jordan... that just shows you how fuagazy Russell's championships are as compared to Mj.. he ONLY WON 91.6 % OF THE playoff series Mj did.. translation.
                    It's impossible to get an accurate gauge of Wilt's REAL PER because the league didn't keep track of Steals or blocks in his time. Hollinger has constantly stated that PER for players who played before the 1973-1974 season will be incredibly inaccurate. And guess what? Chamberlain retired after the 1972-1973 season.

                    Career wise, they were equal in PPG. But Wilt shot a higher %, averaged 17 more rebounds and only 1 less assist. And if they kept track of blocks and steals in Wilt's time I can guarantee you he would have a higher PER then Jordan.


                    Originally posted by jimmy1569
                    . Russell's REAL rING TALLY is 5.5 RINGS TO MJ'S 6 & mj WAS THE mvp OF EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE 24 SERIES BY FAR.... RUSSELL AT BEST was no more than half of the time Mvp OF HIS 22 SERIES... MJ IS THE MOST DOMINANT WINNER OF ALLTIME.. HE LED THE ENTIRE LEAGUE REG SEASON & PLAYOFFS IN SCORING IN ALL 6 CHAMPIONSHIP years. His teams OWN THE TOP 2 BEST RECORDS IN NBA HISTORY BACK TO BACK 72 & 69 WINS RESPECTIVELY.. 70.5 WINS 11.5 LOSSES IN CONSECUTIVE YEARS IS UNPRECEDENTED.... so i suggest you apologize. MJ IS THE BEST BY THE NUMBERS & REALLY THE BEST WINNER AS WELL.. DEFINTELY THE MOST DOMINANT WINNER that's for sure.
                    When it comes down to it, Russell won more titles. Stop trying to act like he won less titles just because he played in less series. He dominated the NBA when he was around. Who cares if it was in a weaker league? You're trying to give the Klits credit for dominating a weak HW division so stop with the double standards.

                    Comment

                    • jimmy1569
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 2920
                      • 114
                      • 0
                      • 3,083

                      #20
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      how can you be the greatest when you refuse to fight the best fighter in your own division?

                      if you like stats ali beat 31 guys in the top 10 and 16 at the time were in the top 3. wlad has beaten 11 and only 3 were in the top 3 and vitali has beaten 7 and 3 were in the top 3. ali fought everyone who ever entered the top 3 from 1962-1978 except thad spencer who fell off. dominating against bums fools so many people.
                      Sure.. compare different eras.. differing ranking systems.. there was Not that many organizations & belt rankings as there are today.. probably 20 or 30 more opponents of the Klitschko's were borderline top 10 & ALI had more bouts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP