Tweet
if they retired today atop the heavyweight landscape... there records combined are 49.5 W's, 2.5 L'S 44.5 ko's = 52 fights 86% ko>>> 92% scorecard ratio>>>95% winning ratio.. Those numbers dwarf most if NOT all of the top 10 greats... i would rank them 1 & 2 based on there dominance but I know how dominance gets downplayed on the forums.... we want to see in our alltime greats parody... close split decisions.. double knockouts... who needs one dimensional dominance.. that's too boring.. The Klits are 1 & 2 today but i'm here to tell you they are 1 & 2 alltime as well.
-
-
i like them both klitscko but no. its about who you fought and beat. the heavy weight division right now doesnt really have a deep roster. -
Isnt it ironic that most of the Klit lickers churn out repetitive and meaningless "statistics" like robots.Comment
-
It's easy to put up gawdy stats when the division is so horrible. And no matter where you rank the Klitschkos alltime they will rank behind Lennox Lewis.Comment
-
I totally agree. I just don't see guys like Frazier, Louis, Tyson, Holmes, Johnson, Jeffries, Sullivan, and several others being better than them. I know Historic ****s, Pro Black, anti Eastern are going to disagree but it's ok. It's my opinion.Comment
-
Meaningless... huh? So numbers don't mean nothing? They don't give a gauge as to how one has performed in his field? Last I checked.. EVERY major sport... the player with the best numbers is regarded as the best that sport has ever seen..
The brothers have plenty of championship hardware... so one can say they got rings. Vitali Klitschko OWNS NUMEROUS heavyweight records.. sure one is an aberration.. two is a coincidence.... three is a crowd.. but when I can come up with TWO handfuls of acchievements HE ALONE has attained in a respective career.. i CAN even say Vitali Klitschko is the biggest & strongest heavyweight in boxing history & have the numbers on my side... f his competition... he makes them ALL inept..
NEARLY anyone who's ever faced him has been pounded into submission.... you guys make it seem like he has to APOLOGIZE FOR having the gall to be More DOMINANT than any fighter that's ever laced them up.
NO.. it's his comp... it can't be him.. has to be the era.. who he's faced.. ever stop & think for once that it's actually him that is responsible for all of it & Not inept opponents.. what more proof do you guys want.. he completely outboxed lennox lewis.. he completely outboxed a boxing wizard in Chris Byrd.. those 2 fights in his lone defeats ARE the telltale signs as to WHAT he does to ANY alltime great of the past.. we have indications as to how he'd perform so why are we denying it.
How can we put ANYONE as the favorite against him based on what we've seen of him... his size advantage alone would be enough but his skills & the fact he knows how to fight seals it... the fact that I know i'm MUCH closer to being right than you guys are is what makes me laugh at all of yous.. facts.. numbers.. size. EVERYTHING is in his favor...you'll realize this when he's gone.. it's a shame you don't realize this now as you clearly don't know what you're missing... no one comes close.. even his bro is not in the stratosphere as he comes with imperfections... Vitali doesn't.. the ONLY blemishes he'll ever have is that his body failed him.. not his boxing skills.Last edited by jimmy1569; 10-30-2011, 10:36 PM.Comment
-
In ability, yes, I think so. In accomplishment, unfortunately, no, they just don't have the competition. Both guys would give any other great heavyweight a tough night, and would beat quite a few of them.Comment
-
Go compare Lennox's numbers vs Vitali. Vitali has had one more fight than LL & his numbers dwarf LL'S & before you say comp or achievement... they are both three time heavyweight champions & Vitali has a 2/1 advantage in scorecard ratio head to head & has NEVER BEEN KTFO LIKE LL HAS TWICE... both lost in similar fashion each time they lost.. LL being ktfo twice & Vitali being injured twice... both times well ahead on the cards... has more knockouts & 2 less knockdowns... so what exactly has LL done better than Vitali? Vitali has been much less imperfect than Lennox & please Vitali dominates the comp that LL faced just the same & more thorough so save it.Comment
Comment