With this in mind would Floyd's jab have a simply connect percentage against Pacquiao?
Why was Mayweather jab so poor against Ortiz?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
When fighters of an opposing stance face each other, there jab hands are right up against each other and often cancel each other out.
That is one reason why Floyd's jab was not as accurate against Ortiz.
Also explains why Pacquiao jab average is lower because he facing orthadox figters most of the time.Comment
-
make a thread explaining how you made a mistake with the jabs dont cont thread and maybe you will one day gain respect...when fighters of an opposing stance face each other, there jab hands are right up against each other and often cancel each other out.
That is one reason why floyd's jab was not as accurate against ortiz.
Also explains why pacquiao jab average is lower because he facing orthadox figters most of the time.Comment
-
Statistics count everything that is a jab... even if he is just pawing with it or use it to find range...http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...ortiz-compubox
Mayweather jab was dreadfully poor against Ortiz, not as poor as Victor who didn't land a single jab.
Mayweather landed only 1 jab in round one, 2 jabs in round two and 3 jabs in round 4.
He only landed 14% of his jabs.
What is the reason behind this, afterall Ortiz is not hard to hit, even when he isn't standing infront of you with his hands down looking the other way.
Besides Ortiz is a southpaw - against a southpaw a jab is more difficult to land... against a southpaw many will tell you the best shot is a left hook or a straight right... and if you opponent can't get out of the way of the right hand who needs a jab... to me it was astonishing how fast he is with it, the timing... because most times he ain't even sets it up and leads with it... but he almost couldn't miss with itComment
Comment