Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why was Mayweather jab so poor against Ortiz?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    With this in mind would Floyd's jab have a simply connect percentage against Pacquiao?

    Comment


    • #52
      Because an orthodox straight right is easier to land than a jab against a southpaw. End/

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Post
        amazing the lengths one will go to tarnish one fighter to make the other look good.
        Thread should have ended right after this post, #4.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
          Because an orthodox straight right is easier to land than a jab against a southpaw. End/
          But what happens to Floyd's jabs why does that lose accuracy?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
            Thread should have ended right after this post, #4.
            No really because it doesn't answer the question or even attempts to.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by d4thincarnation View Post
              but what happens to floyd's jabs why does that lose accuracy?
              maybe their is a huge cultural barrier. That is why you dont understand how ignorant you look. Seriously bro stop. Your killing your self respect.

              Comment


              • #57
                When fighters of an opposing stance face each other, there jab hands are right up against each other and often cancel each other out.

                That is one reason why Floyd's jab was not as accurate against Ortiz.

                Also explains why Pacquiao jab average is lower because he facing orthadox figters most of the time.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by d4thincarnation View Post
                  when fighters of an opposing stance face each other, there jab hands are right up against each other and often cancel each other out.

                  That is one reason why floyd's jab was not as accurate against ortiz.

                  Also explains why pacquiao jab average is lower because he facing orthadox figters most of the time.
                  make a thread explaining how you made a mistake with the jabs dont cont thread and maybe you will one day gain respect...

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...ortiz-compubox

                    Mayweather jab was dreadfully poor against Ortiz, not as poor as Victor who didn't land a single jab.

                    Mayweather landed only 1 jab in round one, 2 jabs in round two and 3 jabs in round 4.

                    He only landed 14% of his jabs.

                    What is the reason behind this, afterall Ortiz is not hard to hit, even when he isn't standing infront of you with his hands down looking the other way.
                    Statistics count everything that is a jab... even if he is just pawing with it or use it to find range...

                    Besides Ortiz is a southpaw - against a southpaw a jab is more difficult to land... against a southpaw many will tell you the best shot is a left hook or a straight right... and if you opponent can't get out of the way of the right hand who needs a jab... to me it was astonishing how fast he is with it, the timing... because most times he ain't even sets it up and leads with it... but he almost couldn't miss with it

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Harry Balls View Post
                      I'm sure its because he read in your thread jabs don't count. Why bother if they don't count?
                      lmfao!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP