Arum Proposal Of neutrality with a Certified testing body is Legit

[-Kev-]

And if you don't understand why I posted that, which you probably won't. I posted that showing i'm okay with the USADA not doing the tests, and hopefully both fighters agree to whoever the "neutral" party is.

Although, I don't know how neutral Bob Arum wants it, than the USADA. An American based drug testing program, the same Americans that gave Pacquiao the nod over Marquez in the rematch, where even PI journalist and Manny ****sucker Ronnie Nathnielsz had for Marquez, and Pacquiao's countryman Nonito Donaire had for Marquez.

Yeah, the US will be so unfair to Manny. Like they have been throughout his whole career.

[Spoon23]

So...Floyd and Mosley knew about the cutoff before hand?

HERE, READ AGAIN...

From Horvo: You guys really think Tygart (usada) is a neutral tester? Here's his explanation of why they stopped testing 18 days out.


"We chose not to test for blood closer to the fight than we did because there was no need to do so. But, of course, if we had some sort of cause or su****ion that meant that we needed to do more blood tests, let's say, five days, or, four days before a fight, then we certainly would have done it," said Tygart.

"And that's why the right to have that option is such an important aspect to having a good program. It's a deterrent for the fighters," said Tygart. "[We were] totally comfortable only having that blood test 18 days before the fight and not needing one more testing day in between."

That said, Random should be done without any human su****ion and involvement. Just set a date and get the athlete tested at a time the athletes won't know about.

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/06/10/do...ause-hematoma/


So what he's saying is that the test was not given randomly, like from a computer generated list, but from their own personal subjective su****ions.

That at a certain point they determined they had tested the fighters enough. Since both fighters were not tested on the same days or the same number of times, that means he could test one fighter later than the other because of a "su****ion". Do you think that's a neutral position? And by definition that is not random. Random means taking the human element out of the decision making process.

[Kagami Taiga]

lo f ucking L!

Since late 2009, blood testing is all you clowns wanted to talk about.

Suddenly, you just want to talk boxing?


You f uckers crack me up.

u clowns?? rite, i argue about blood testing so much? gtfo. dont generalize u idiot. its always the wrong answer.

[puga]

So...Floyd and Mosley knew about the cutoff before hand?

prolly not...but what guaratee do you have that both did not use in that 18 period when they did not test?....(usada claim urine aint enough)....

[jrosales13]

you tell us..........

As far as I know they found out after the fact...Is there anything that proves otherwise?

[-Kev-]

You weren't saying that just a year ago.

You're saying it now.

whoopdee whoo.

You've changed stances just as Floyd has. I understand, its because you love him. You f ucking love him. You've said so yourself.

If Floyd said, "you know what, I don't need this extra test".

You and every other Floyd stan would say the exact same thing.

He says, you follow.

When Floyd broke the news that he signed to fight Victor Ortiz, I said I fucking love you Floyd. I won't lie about that. And you know, if Pacquiao signs to fight a young hungry fighter, I would love him too. No ****.


And what was I not saying last year? Last year, Team Pacquiao/Bob Arum didn't even want to take a 14 day cut off date, let alone be as advanced as who is going to take the tests. You seem confused bro.

[Vasyl’s dad]

And if you don't understand why I posted that, which you probably won't. I posted that showing i'm okay with the USADA not doing the tests, and hopefully both fighters agree to whoever the "neutral" party is.

Although, I don't know how neutral Bob Arum wants it, than the USADA. An American based drug testing program, the same Americans that gave Pacquiao the nod over Marquez in the rematch, where even PI journalist and Manny ****sucker Ronnie Nathnielsz had for Marquez, and Pacquiao's countryman Nonito Donaire had for Marquez.

Yeah, the US will be so unfair to Manny. Like they have been throughout his whole career.

If you were Manny, would you take that chance in the biggest fight of your life?

Not you being you, dominican kid from the east coast, but you being Manny Pacquiao, Fighter of the decade and multiple division champion.

Would you take that chance fighting an american fighter, in america, with an american testing agency doing your drug tests that is only happening because your american opponent who accused you of cheating, won't fight you without it?

Log off for a few days guy. Reason is not your strong suit right now.

[Spoon23]

And if you don't understand why I posted that, which you probably won't. I posted that showing i'm okay with the USADA not doing the tests, and hopefully both fighters agree to whoever the "neutral" party is.

Although, I don't know how neutral Bob Arum wants it, than the USADA. An American based drug testing program, the same Americans that gave Pacquiao the nod over Marquez in the rematch, where even PI journalist and Manny ****sucker Ronnie Nathnielsz had for Marquez, and Pacquiao's countryman Nonito Donaire had for Marquez.

Yeah, the US will be so unfair to Manny. Like they have been throughout his whole career.

Bro, as long as it is a legit testing neutral body. I don't see a problem here. Floyd gets his random

[puga]

As far as I know they found out after the fact...Is there anything that proves otherwise?

ok then, your information is as good as everyone elses...now, whats your gurantee both floyd and shane did'nt use in the 18 day window since they did not test and that usada claimes urine is not enough?....what?

[jrosales13]

prolly not...but what guaratee do you have that both did not use in that 18 period when they did not test?....(usada claim urine aint enough)....

None...There's also no guarantee that anybody would not use prior to the cut off date...

However, if they didn't know about the cutoff before hand. You even saying it's probable that they didn't know...Wouldn't the danger still be there that they still could have shown up at anytime to test? Which would help prevent them from not doping. Since they wouldn't have know when exactly the cutoff was...