Originally posted by jrosales13
View Post
the only real issue now is the "who" will conduct the test....
taking away the personalities (arum, pac, pbf, usada,psc etc) to discuss this so as to focus on some salient points:
one..this is all part of a negotiation where one fighter (A) demands for additional testing outside of the regular procedures....whereby the other fighter (B) said no first....
two..we now have fighter B agreeing to the additional test but is requesting an agency other than the one fighter A wishes to use....
so what is there to it now?
1. both camps may come up with a mutually agreed test agency and the mechanics of the testing procedures...and all other things being up to par then the fight is sealed..
2. both camps still agreeing to disagree and we're back to 0 - no fight, still.
i read some posts that propose using two testing agencies - like a back-up or a check and balance thing....
possible, yes...........
just hoping if such came about, both test agencies will come up with the same test readings....otherwise, we will have a ticklish situation like a gordian knot.....
Comment