Just give me a quick guide to the quintisiental Pernel performance. At least give people the chance to critic Pernell. The reasons you put Pernel on a pedestal give us the chance to shoot the reason down. Pac have been disected like a post mortem. And most are not valid reasons anyone would take seriously.
Who amongst these fighters ranks highest in the ATG list?
Collapse
-
-
Because;Just give me a quick guide to the quintisiental Pernel performance. At least give people the chance to critic Pernell. The reasons you put Pernel on a pedestal give us the chance to shoot the reason down. Pac have been disected like a post mortem. And most are not valid reasons anyone would take seriously.
Whitaker is argubaly a Top 5 LW, which is argubally the deepest division in the history of the sport.
Whitaker has a win over Nelson which is as good as any win Pac has expect Barrera.
Whitaker should have a win over Chavez which is better than any win Pac has.
Along with 8 defences at LW. 8 Defences at WW. And titles at 140 and 154.
I also feel he beat a prime De La Hoya but that's argubale.
Along with almost 10 other wins against Top ranked oppoents on top of that.
But, this has already been stressed numerous times and you have dismissed it so naturally you will dismiss this also.Comment
-
You know if anyone was to do a bit of research on Pernels opponents they could have a field day. How many were coming off loses or shop worn, or werent even any good in the first place? How many did he cherry pick? If anybody could be bothered to check it, it wouldnt be hard believe me. With Pac, people do bother to look for any possible excuse, and if there isnt one they will trying selling you one like the cowsboy salesmen they are.Because;
Whitaker is argubaly a Top 5 LW, which is argubally the deepest division in the history of the sport.
Whitaker has a win over Nelson which is as good as any win Pac has expect Barrera.
Whitaker should have a win over Chavez which is better than any win Pac has.
Along with 8 defences at LW. 8 Defences at WW. And titles at 140 and 154.
I also feel he beat a prime De La Hoya but that's argubale.
Along with almost 10 other wins against Top ranked oppoents on top of that.
But, this has already been stressed numerous times and you have dismissed it so naturally you will dismiss this also.Comment
-
Your statment is based off absolutely nothing.You know if anyone was to do a bit of research on Pernels opponents they could have a field day. How many were coming off loses or shop worn, or werent even any good in the first place? How many did he cherry pick? If anybody could be bothered to check it, it wouldnt be hard believe me. With Pac, people do bother to look for any possible excuse, and if there isnt one they will trying selling you one like the cowsboy salesmen they are.
Well done.Comment
-
-
if we are talking skills, if Mayweather or Whitaker without a doubt. If we're talking records again its Whitaker, Hopkins or Pacquiao. If we consider both, you are left with Whitaker, maybe Pacquiao if he beats FloydComment

Comment