I have him at top 30.
Bernard Hopkins top ten of alltime
Collapse
-
You're a joke of a poster.Monzon held the middleweight title for 7 years and defended it 14 times. How is that better than B-Hop holding a major title for 10 years, winning all 4 titles in that span and defending it 20 times? How is that 10 billion light years greater than Hopkins when its not even on par with B-Hop?
Your a ****ing moron and that is just to start, seriously.
You're a fucking moron and that is just to start, seriouslyComment
-
Erm I don't know what a shot Ray losing to Moyer has to do with anything?All fabulous fighters have studied every last man you mentioned.I know my history dude i just do not like to discount fighters because we live in an internet age where all of there faults are discussed constantly,imagine the sht that would have been talked after Ali lost to Norton or after Ray Robinson lost to Denny Moyer.
Well considering that Norton got beat in a rematch is plus for Ali it should also be noted that he was past-prime in all the Norton fights, just because some guys are childish in nsb about losses it doesn't mean Hopkins should be top 10, he isn't anywhere near it.Comment
-
You should really stick to talking about Pacquiao and Mayweather.Hopkins accomplishments at middleweight are better than anyone named in this thread.
If we're talking about strictly middleweight than Hopkins is #1. Undisputed World Champion, First fighter ever to hold all 4 major titles. Defended his title a record 20 times.
Show me anyone who can match Hopkins resume at 160. You can't because it doesn't exist.
Now top 10 ATG P4P is a different story.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I love how when I bring facts to the table everyone changes the subject. Debate the validity of my points or throw out name calling like a baby. Either way your ignorance is sad and pathetic.Comment
-
I love how when I bring facts to the table everyone changes the subject. Debate the validity of my points or throw out name calling like a baby. Either way your ignorance is sad and pathetic.Comment
-
Really? Realllly? You're genuinely trying to argue Hopkins is greater than Monzon at 160?Monzon held the middleweight title for 7 years and defended it 14 times. How is that better than B-Hop holding a major title for 10 years, winning all 4 titles in that span and defending it 20 times? How is that 10 billion light years greater than Hopkins when its not even on par with B-Hop?
Your a ****ing moron and that is just to start, seriously.
Sooooo you're saying more title defences=greater?
Hopkins has 20 title defences. Ok? Nowwww compare those to Monzon's 14 title defences. Not even ****ing close.
How many HOF middleweight's did Hopkins beat compared to Monzon?
Actually, forget that, how many Top 5 fighters at the time he fought them did Hopkins beat compared to Monzon?
Answer those questions for me please.
An Monzon's middleweight era is 1,000X better than Hopkins Middleweight era.Comment
-
Really? Realllly? You're genuinely trying to argue Hopkins is greater than Monzon at 160?Monzon held the middleweight title for 7 years and defended it 14 times. How is that better than B-Hop holding a major title for 10 years, winning all 4 titles in that span and defending it 20 times? How is that 10 billion light years greater than Hopkins when its not even on par with B-Hop?
Your a ****ing moron and that is just to start, seriously.
Sooooo you're saying more title defences=greater?
Hopkins has 20 title defences. Ok? Nowwww compare those to Monzon's 14 title defences. Not even ****ing close.
How many HOF middleweight's did Hopkins beat compared to Monzon?
Actually, forget that, how many Top 5 fighters at the time he fought them did Hopkins beat compared to Monzon?
Answer those questions for me please.
An Monzon's middleweight era is 1,000X better than Hopkins Middleweight era.Comment

Comment