How Would You Rate Pacman's Defense? His "slickness"?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ramamaiden
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2007
    • 1744
    • 53
    • 102
    • 8,001

    #101
    Originally posted by Junito-Rulez
    Average but Pac's defense is offense. People cant land punches on him coz they know he will land twice more. It takes a brillant technician to capitalize on Manny's mistakes.
    Completely agree....thats why Marquez is one of the few that can be competitive with Pac.

    Comment

    • B.U.R.N.E.R
      ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 30197
      • 1,346
      • 400
      • 47,475

      #102
      Originally posted by 2501
      We know Pacquiao is an offensive machine, but I really do think he's defense is underrated. He's shown an ability to slip punches when not engaging or when in a defensive position. Of course, he does get hit more often because he's an offensive fighter. But how do you rate his defense?
      Everytime Clottey threw, he landed flush.

      Pacs defense is awful.

      Comment

      • Cherry Picker
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2010
        • 2827
        • 179
        • 204
        • 3,355

        #103
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Everytime Clottey threw, he landed flush.

        Pacs defense is awful.
        Then why won't Floyd fight him if he is that bad?

        Comment

        • RubenSonny
          Lagos State of Mind
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 4747
          • 287
          • 388
          • 11,330

          #104
          Originally posted by pistol whip
          Im not the one justifying Floyds excuses so who exactly is Mr.sensative here?
          Im not sure what your getting at whippy...

          Comment

          • rdr02000
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 32
            • 0
            • 0
            • 6,059

            #105
            Pacman is a risk taking fighter. And that's what people like. People pay to see actions not boxing clinic. If you think he has bad defense, but he wins, that all that matters.

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #106
              Originally posted by rdr02000
              Pacman is a risk taking fighter. And that's what people like. People pay to see actions not boxing clinic. If you think he has bad defense, but he wins, that all that matters.
              So why is one of the best pure boxers of the last 50 years the biggest PPV draw?

              Comment

              • Castor_Troy
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 724
                • 244
                • 316
                • 7,564

                #107
                Originally posted by Di Bushbaby
                Did that half dead version of Oscar even throw 90 punches??
                Pac's performance emits an illusion that Oscar isnt throwing.

                He throws almost the same number of punches compared to his last two fights. Look it up.

                Comment

                • GOAT86
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 5638
                  • 146
                  • 39
                  • 13,214

                  #108
                  What def? What slickness? I guess TS speaks out of LaLa-land and confused Pac with May, lmfao.

                  Comment

                  • 2501
                    upinurgirlsguts
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 20211
                    • 902
                    • 49
                    • 28,237

                    #109
                    Originally posted by GOAT86
                    What def? What slickness? I guess TS speaks out of LaLa-land and confused Pac with May, lmfao.
                    Wait, so if Pac has no defense and is just a skill-less brawler, why is fighting another brawler an easy fight for him?

                    Comment

                    • Toney Loc
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 12092
                      • 597
                      • 1,190
                      • 14,860

                      #110
                      Pacquiao and slickness should never be used in the same sentence. Unless it's "Floyd Mayweather's slickness frustrated Pacquiao to the point of tears".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP