why is mannys resume so overated and floyds so underated???
Collapse
-
-
As far as Cotto vs Mosley...who gives a **** about a ranking when both met in the ring and Cotto came out the victor.Barrera is better than Floyd's best win. However, Cotto was ranked below Mosley by just about everyone, many people though Marquez won both fights with Pacquiao, and Morales had lost 2 of his last 3 fights when Pacquiao beat him. I don't see how those 3 wins are any better than Floyd's wins over Corrales, Castillo, or Mosley.
And Marquez, Morales, and Cotto>>>>>Corrales, Castillo and Shane. Career wise, skill wise, prime for prime wise....what ever you wanna throw out there.Comment
-
the thread is pretty much questioning the faith and devotion a ******* has in their lord and saviour pacquiao. imagine the most devout ****** you know and then you'll understand there mentality. all of a pacquiaos wins are the greatest of all time and mayweathers are worthless and pitiful in comparison. so its pointless to even to ask.Comment
-
Now its quite possibly overtrained...what made you change your mind? Old fighters can't compete anymore?
You never answered my question about Manfredy. If you don't know, just say so.Last edited by V.WEBB; 07-04-2010, 07:10 PM.Comment
-
Yea, he may have overtrained.
You'll just answer with another question.
have fun coach..
Comment
-
I disagree. I have always given him full credit for his wins over Corrales, Judah (alot of Floyd fans don't even give him the credit he deserves for this win), Hernandez, Castillo, Hatton, and Mosley. All great wins, and all get full credit from me....no excuses or b.s.the thread is pretty much questioning the faith and devotion a ******* has in their lord and saviour pacquiao. imagine the most devout ****** you know and then you'll understand there mentality. all of a pacquiaos wins are the greatest of all time and mayweathers are worthless and pitiful in comparison. so its pointless to even to ask.
That still doesn't change my opinion that Barrera and Morales are better fighters than those guys ever were, and the fact that Cotto is a better win than Mosley and Judah, two guys Cotto beat.Comment
-
Just joined good to see people discussing the best fighters.
One thing I am having trouble understanding is the people's opinions towards Mosely. Floyd Mayweather beats Mosely and everyone criticizes him saying Mosely is too old. Yet I saw Freddy Roach on an interview and he said that Shane came to their gym twice trying to fight Manny and they turned him down twice. There was a dispute over the weight. Shane agreed to fight Manny at the same weight (147) that he fought Oscar but they still refused. And Roach in his own words said that Mosely was better than Oscar and they would not fight him at this weight.
Now this is not meant as an attack on Manny because I'm a fan of his. But I seriously doubt if Floyd's camp had done the same thing that people would be so understanding. People hate Floyd so much they'll criticize him even though he did something Manny's camp did not want to do and that is fight Sugar Shane Mosely.
I am curious to hear what people think of this.Comment
-
I agree, a prime Morales is better then anyone Mayweather beat. Fact is, Pacquiao didn't beat a prime Morales. I mean, this doesn't necessarily mean Pacquiao's wins are greater because size needs to be taken into consideration.I disagree. I have always given him full credit for his wins over Corrales, Judah (alot of Floyd fans don't even give him the credit he deserves for this win), Hernandez, Castillo, Hatton, and Mosley. All great wins, and all get full credit from me....no excuses or b.s.
That still doesn't change my opinion that Barrera and Morales are better fighters than those guys ever were, and the fact that Cotto is a better win than Mosley and Judah, two guys Cotto beat.Comment
Comment