why is mannys resume so overated and floyds so underated???
Collapse
-
-
JMM is done probably too. But the funny thing is he wasn't done after Pacquiao fought him. Bring the weight up all you want. But Floyd still beat him a **** load more conviningly. And if Cotto does have a bigger fan base than Mosley, how does that make Cotto a better win given that Mosley had just stomped Margarito? To me, 130 and below is where Pacquiao's resume is the best. Three opponents he beat that were notworthy at these weights are common opponents that Floyd has.cmon dude, pac didnt fight mosley so he can fight the guy that beat mosley in cotto. this is not that difficult to comprehend.
pac fought cotto who beat mosley & is with top rank. pac & top rank dont have to share the money with gbp while fighting a guy in cotto who has a bigger fanbase.
why risk pac when you can make more money risking it against your own guy.
As for roach saying mosley was too good, that was roach way of placating mosley. roach was just tying to make shane feel better with the "too good" comment. Its a way of saying no nicely. If roach told shane you are too good, that leaves shane no choice but to drop it.
The shane that showed up to fight floyd would have been murked by manny.
shane is done as a elite fighter. the way he gassed out after the 3rd round proves this.
why do you think he's fighting sergio mora now?
shane is done.Comment
-
People are forgetting that Pacquiao started PROFESSIONALLY at the lowest weight possible and just destroyed two welterweights in his last two fights like they were sparring partners, which obviously magnifies his resume and should be above anybody else at the moment. And people here are arguing that Pacquiao got easily black and blued in his last two fights, funny.Comment
-
Comment
-
"man this site has gone to hell...all i hear is pac this floyd this..there are plenty of other boxers to post about...if ya'll even know any other boxers"
-LarryXComment
-
Comment
-
JMM is done probably too. But the funny thing is he wasn't done after Pacquiao fought him. Bring the weight up all you want. But Floyd still beat him a **** load more conviningly. And if Cotto does have a bigger fan base than Mosley, how does that make Cotto a better win given that Mosley had just stomped Margarito? To me, 130 and below is where Pacquiao's resume is the best. Three opponents he beat that were notworthy at these weights are common opponents that Floyd has.
are you seriously comparing the marquez that pac fought 2x vs the marquez that floyd fought?
seriously?
pac took on marquez the first time when EVERYBODY DUCKED MARQUEZ!!!! Morales, Barerra, & NASEEM HAMED ducked marquez.
It was a mid 20s one handed, raw, green pacquiao that gave 30 year old absolute physical prime marquez a chance.
Then another chance at 130 when he was 34 years old.
Now compare that to the marquez who floyd fought after marquez went through 3 straight wars in a row vs pac, casa, & diaz. Floyd fought a what 36 year old career featherweight at welterweight vs a welterweight former junior middle champ who is undefeated?
GTFO.Comment
-
Comment
-
barrera, marquez and morales that 3 opponent alone of pac is better than floyds overall resume....Comment
-
If you're a real fan of boxing, you should be able to see that neither has all that much better of a resume then the other. Pac fans can argue that Mayweather has fought over the hill fighters, but Pacs best wins over MAB and Morales was after they had been already destroyed each other. I'm not saying that those weren't great wins, but Pac didn't fight the MAB or EM that were beasts like they once were. Just like Mayweather is criticized for fighting less the great opposition, it really can't be denied that Pacquiao has been fed fighters that were tailor made for his style of boxing, Diaz, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey. Not hating, just telling it how I see it.Comment
.
Comment