Originally posted by Ray*
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tygart: "Blood testing within 18 days of the fight was not necessary"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View PostHe did say that. But he said that BASED on the samples that they had. They didn't feel a NEED to blood test after that, BUT STILL HAD THE RIGHT TO DO IT WHENEVER...HENCE RANDOM BLOOD TESTING.
Comment
-
Originally posted by one-Punch View PostI have never seen a boxer demand random drug testing due to the bias beliefs of him and his team. I've never seen anything like it. Have you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by n0b0dy View PostFor someone to question the education system and having English as your first language, I'm ashamed at you calling people mentally ******ed when you have this kind of post. Learn basic grammar first before calling people mentally ******ed.
Ok mate, i guess i touched a nerve somewhere.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View PostI have seen a fighter be demanded to do a drug test when there were no drug testing in boxing. The fighter that was asked to do it, did it and didn't cry and complain about why he shouldn't do it. See: Holyfield v Tyson II.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostA (single) steroid test. Not OSDT where they have the ability to poke u and pull blood up till the day of the fight. If it were 1 test as Evander took, i'm sure Pac would have no problem with it.
So you only have a problem with it because Pacquaio does? And again both fighters are taking the test. So whats the problem? Its good for boxing right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostA (single) steroid test. Not OSDT where they have the ability to poke u and pull blood up till the day of the fight. If it were 1 test as Evander took, i'm sure Pac would have no problem with it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View PostAnd. So what. That was 96, this is 2010. Of course they will be an advance dude. And why are YOU worrying about HIM being poked for blood? He has done it before and he is still living. Or are you with the crowd that says that he lost to EM the first fight because of it?
Comment
-
Originally posted by n0b0dy View PostI'm all for a better testing, but when you're clearly using it to get a metal leverage, a reason to duck and to tarnish one's reputation its a whole different story. When Pacquiao agreed to 14 days cut off just to make the fight possible, Floyd fans said its a different negotiating timetable, and now should be higher cut for Floyd and no cut off dates. And here Tygart clearly saying that 18 days before the fight they have an idea if you NEED further testing or not. Its clearly just a tool for Floyd not to fight and tarnish Pacquiao's reputation and for Tygart to make some money.
Comment
Comment