Where does Wladimir Klitschko rank anong the all time HWs?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #61
    Originally posted by Pirao
    Says who? Last time I checked, Holyfield was beaten easily by Ibragimov.
    And last time I checked the difference between an undefeated Larry Holmes and today's Evander Holyfield is night and day.

    Comment

    • Pirao
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2010
      • 3867
      • 131
      • 439
      • 10,171

      #62
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      And last time I checked the difference between an undefeated Larry Holmes and today's Evander Holyfield is night and day.
      Who's saying it isn't? But, you were the one saying that Ray Austin probably can't beat Evander, explain that please.

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #63
        Originally posted by Pirao
        Who's saying it isn't? But, you were the one saying that Ray Austin probably can't beat Evander, explain that please.
        My post was meant to be sarcastic, in the face of this:

        Stiff challenge of a well past his prime Larry Holmes. Ray Austin could probably beat Holyfield right now, so what?
        Anyone who can justify this comparison is pretty pathetic.

        Comment

        • Pirao
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 3867
          • 131
          • 439
          • 10,171

          #64
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          My post was meant to be sarcastic, in the face of this:



          Anyone who can justify this comparison is pretty pathetic.
          Yeah, surely because mr know it all says so BTW I thought you said you were going to ignore me, but it looks like you can't do what you say, eh?

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #65
            Originally posted by Pirao
            Yeah, surely because mr know it all says so BTW I thought you said you were going to ignore me, but it looks like you can't do what you say, eh?
            Let's try to stick to the topic, as much as it pains you.

            Please tell me how you can compare a 35 year old, 47-0 heavyweight champ's title defense to a 47yr old shot ex-champion?

            Comment

            • Davros?
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 5224
              • 153
              • 0
              • 12,360

              #66
              Originally posted by crold1
              Carl Williams wasn't a bad fighter, but he was chinny so he was as likely to beat Mike as Ray was Wlad. That said, Williams was a better fighter than Austin. Williams = stiff challenge of Holmes. Austin = life and death with Sultan. Williams > Austin.
              Carl Williams was a decent fighter but just had a poor chin, he looked very good against Larry Holmes and Bert Cooper.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #67
                Originally posted by Davros?
                Carl Williams was a decent fighter but just had a poor chin, he looked very good against Larry Holmes and Bert Cooper.
                Agreed. And I think the poor chin rep sorta hurt him against Tyson - he was stunned but not out on his feet or anything when the fight was stopped.

                Comment

                • Counter Punch
                  Banned
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 592
                  • 69
                  • 24
                  • 728

                  #68
                  I'd rank him right ahead of Vitali

                  Comment

                  • crold1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 6354
                    • 328
                    • 122
                    • 19,304

                    #69
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Agreed. And I think the poor chin rep sorta hurt him against Tyson - he was stunned but not out on his feet or anything when the fight was stopped.
                    Most forget it wasn't just a punch in Tyson...Mike (by accident) caught him with the hook and blasted him on a weave coming the other direction, head connecting right on Williams chin a second after the punch. Funny stuff.

                    Comment

                    • Pirao
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 3867
                      • 131
                      • 439
                      • 10,171

                      #70
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      Let's try to stick to the topic, as much as it pains you.

                      Please tell me how you can compare a 35 year old, 47-0 heavyweight champ's title defense to a 47yr old shot ex-champion?
                      I'm not comparing, I'm stating that a decent losing performance against a past his prime champion has as much relevance as if Ray Austin beat Evander Holyfield nowadays, which is to say, none.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP