Because you say so? As I said, short of a time machine experiment, making assertions like that as they are fact, is asinine.
Really? Which one of Tyson's 1980s title fight opponents do you feel is bad enough to be in Austin's league? Do I need a time machine to know Ray Robinson was a better Middleweight than Felix Sturm too?
Really? Which one of Tyson's 1980s title fight opponents do you feel is bad enough to be in Austin's league? Do I need a time machine to know Ray Robinson was a better Middleweight than Felix Sturm too?
No, because Ray Robinson's achievements are much higher's than Sturm's.You would need a time machine to say one era was better than the other though. Thanks for being obnoxious BTW.
As to your question about Tyson's opponents, Carl Williams.
No, because Ray Robinson's achievements are much higher's than Sturm's.You would need a time machine to say one era was better than the other though. Thanks for being obnoxious BTW.
As to your question about Tyson's opponents, Carl Williams.
Carl Williams wasn't a bad fighter, but he was chinny so he was as likely to beat Mike as Ray was Wlad. That said, Williams was a better fighter than Austin. Williams = stiff challenge of Holmes. Austin = life and death with Sultan. Williams > Austin.
Carl Williams wasn't a bad fighter, but he was chinny so he was as likely to beat Mike as Ray was Wlad. That said, Williams was a better fighter than Austin. Williams = stiff challenge of Holmes. Austin = life and death with Sultan. Williams > Austin.
Stiff challenge of a well past his prime Larry Holmes. Ray Austin could probably beat Holyfield right now, so what?
Tweet
Comment