HORUS PRESENTS: WHY NoW???

[jrosales13]

im still waiting on HORUS'S circumstantial evidence against pac.......

There is no circumstantial evidence against Pac. If this was a court of law. Pac would be found not guilty.

[koboy]

Where is it? Show me how Pac is innocent and PROVE it.

I'll wait.

I'm not even talking about Pac anymore. I'm just talking about how absurd and proposterous your way of twisted thinking is.

Let me repeat what you said -

Where is the proof hes innocent?

Shouldn't it read, where is the proof that he is guilty. Where do you live, man? Saudi Arabia.

Why don't you ask your girl, who has probably been faithful to you, has stood by your side over the years and has never given you a reason to suspect her of cheating, for proof that she hasn't been giving free *******s to the cats in your neighbourhood because her fellatio skills has vastly improved over the years?

In other words, ask her to show you proof that she's innocent.

Let's see what type of response you'll get. She'll probably say "GTFO and give me my damn welfare check back."

Oh, Burner, you should have left me back on ignore. I lost that little bit of respect for you when you took me out of it. If you gonna be a *****, at least man up to it.

[shogunn]

the one time someone ask Pacquiao too take a test that could detect PED's, he didnt want too take it.

"You can not fail a test, you refuse to take." Pacquiao

look, his reading comprehension skills are fd. article didnt say peds, but did say roids. not good enough for you? do you even know what PEDS are? theyre a type of what? a side meth?

[HandSpeed303]

[QUOTE=Horus;7777450]Ask yourself, How did Marion get busted for PED's usage?

* Circumstantial evidence, not a positive test.

Ask yourself, How did Shane Mosley get busted for PED usage?

* Circumstantial evidence, not a positive test.

Ask yourself, How did Mark Mcgwire get busted for PED usage?

* Circumstantial evidence, not a positive test.

Ask yourself, How did Roger Clemens get busted for PED usage?

* Circumstantial evidence, not a positive test.


Every single one of those people had their names on a list that showed dealings with Balco....

Cut it out.

Where is the list with Pac's name on it? Or even a paper trail? You know Tiger Woods had dealings with a doctor that deals in HGH. The paper trail never lies...Where is Manny's?

[P4P Opinion]

I'm going to have to address this post in stages, because we aren't getting anywhere and it's beginning to frustrate me.

Listen, let's use your definition for argument sake.

Evidence which may allow a trial judge or jury to deduce or logically infer a certain fact from other established facts, which have been proven.
EXAMPLE: Justice Best in the 1820 case, King v Burdett:
"When one or more things are proved, from which our experience enables us to ascertain that another, not proved, must have happened, we presume that it did happen, as well in criminal as in civil cases."


Like I said before, Circumstantial evidence is used when Indisputeable or hard evidence can not be presented.

Circumstantial evidence includes testimony
Circumstantial evidence includes eye witness accounts
Circumstantial evidence includes pattern profiles where they bring in experts to testify on behavior

Agreed. You don't need to explain it to me.

Hard Proof: is a positive test, a dead body, etc. .
something we can touch, see, feel,and hear.

Do you understand almost everything else is circumstantial!

Again, you don't need to explain it to me, I've already demonstrated that I understand very clearly. You on the other hand seem to have some way to go.

So once again. the only evidence we have so far in the case of Manny Pacquiao is circumstantial evidence. which can include testimony, eye witness accounts, anything, except hard evidence like a positive test.

Once again Circumstantial evidence in any court in america if argue correctly can get you verdict of guilty.

What circumstantial evidence though? You haven't posted anything that meets the established criteria.

Come my dude, you should know this.

as for the circumstances surrounding pacqiauo which have me believing
he is on something, I already posted.

I only allow people who are making sense to patronise me. Don't cop out and say you've already done something. You've taken the time to respond to my posts and you've asked me to quotes sources for what I say in a completely unnecessary fashion, so the least you can do is post the so-called circumstantial evidence you have.

[DonTaseMeBrah]

Listen, let's use your definition for argument sake.

Evidence which may allow a trial judge or jury to deduce or logically infer a certain fact from other established facts, which have been proven.
EXAMPLE: Justice Best in the 1820 case, King v Burdett:
"When one or more things are proved, from which our experience enables us to ascertain that another, not proved, must have happened, we presume that it did happen, as well in criminal as in civil cases."


Like I said before, Circumstantial evidence is used when Indisputeable or hard evidence can not be presented.

Circumstantial evidence includes testimony
Circumstantial evidence includes eye witness accounts
Circumstantial evidence includes pattern profiles where they bring in experts to testify on behavior


Hard Proof: is a positive test, a dead body, etc. .
something we can touch, see, feel,and hear.

Do you understand almost everything else is circumstantial!

So once again. the only evidence we have so far in the case of Manny Pacquiao is circumstantial evidence. which can include testimony, eye witness accounts, anything, except hard evidence like a positive test.

Once again Circumstantial evidence in any court in america if argue correctly can get you verdict of guilty.


Come my dude, you should know this.
as for the circumstances surrounding pacqiauo which have me believing
he is on something, I already posted.

horus your mental comprehension is scaring me. Seriously, if you were a lawyer & you tried to try pac in court that he used steroids, would you win?

honest answer please.

You keep saying circumstantial evidence eye witness accounts, testimony, & profile patterns.

What do you have against pac?


YOU NEITHER HAVE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OR HARD PROOF.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

I'm not even talking about Pac anymore. I'm just talking about how absurd and proposterous your way of twisted thinking is.

Let me repeat what you said -

Where is the proof hes innocent?

Shouldn't it read, where is the proof that he is guilty. Where do you live, man? Saudi Arabia.

Why don't you ask your girl, who has probably been faithful to you, has stood by your side over the years and has never given you a reason to suspect her of cheating, for proof that she hasn't been giving free *******s to the cats in your neighbourhood because her fellatio skills has vastly improved over the years?

In other words, ask her to show you proof that she's innocent.

Let's see what type of response you'll get. She'll probably say "GTFO and give me my damn welfare check back."

Oh, Burner, you should have left me back on ignore. I lost that little bit of respect for you when you took me out of it. If you gonna be a *****, at least man up to it.

Enough of the childish analogies. Talk boxing.

Wheres the proof?

[koboy]

horus your mental comprehension is scaring me. Seriously, if you were a lawyer & you tried to try pac in court that he used steroids, would you win?

honest answer please.

You keep saying circumstantial evidence eye witness accounts, testimony, & profile patterns.

What do you have against pac?


YOU NEITHER HAVE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OR HARD PROOF.

Can 40-0 from 106 - 154 be considered circumstantial evidence?

[Roxas]

There is a chance that he is CHEATING there is a chance he ISNT. his fans need to realize that.

exactly and the blood testing will fix all that....

[shogunn]

circumstantial evidence - roger and Sr, "that mother****er's on A-side Meth"

Judge: "how do you know this"

Roger and SR "th..thth-that mother****er's on Aside meth"



Hard Evidence.

Manny passing all tests from the commission.